San Francisco bakery sparks debate by refusing to serve armed police

stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to News@lemmy.world – 641 points –
independent.co.uk

Business says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed

174

You are viewing a single comment

Lol! "Bigoted and discriminatory"! As if they were born a cop, had no choice to be anything other that a cop, and could never be without a uniform or a weapon. Fuck 'em.

My partner was a charge nurse on a psych ward for 16 years. Many of her interactions with police were as follows:

POLICE: buzzes the desk
My Parnter: Yes?
P: This is officer so-and-so with the so-and-so police department. We have a warrant for the arrest of a patient on your ward. Let us in.
MP: Okay, but this is a secure ward and firearms are not allowed. Surrender your weapons at the security office and I'll grant you access to make your arrest when you return.
P: I'M NOT SURRENDERING MY WEAPON!
MP: Well, then can't enter this ward.
end of conversation

They also have to check their guns when they go into places like prisons, so those guys are just idiots.

Yes, but that's to their friends; not people who should be obeying their instructions without question like the peasants they are.

So right. If they give up their lethal weapons how else can they be the most dominant person in the room?

"bigoted and discriminatory"

What happened to those supreme court rulings they were so in favor of, that allowed poor little christians to blatantly discriminate against people they don't like

That sounds delicious to be able to tell them that. I got fired from a retail job I worked for five years for telling customers about the sign on the door that asks them not to carry. Got unemployment so at least the state knew it was bullshit.