Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksmod to Games@sh.itjust.works – 725 points –
twitter.com
478

You are viewing a single comment

This is a great opportunity to mention 15th Anniversary of GOG.

If only they supported Linux better, or really like at all... I know you can grab the files and install without DRM. But, the whole lack of a client makes it a nuisance to use. I used to buy everything on GOG when possible. Since I got a Steam Deck that's changed. I shouldn't have to use Heroic Launcher IMO..

Why shouldn't you have to use heroic launcher or lutris? The whole point of drm free is that you don't need a specific launcher connected to Internet.

Yet, ease of access is what appeals to the average consumer which leads to preferring steam for Linux for the same reason people get hardware restricted consoles. If a company wants to appeal and expand their market making themselves more accessible is how they do it. Otherwise alternative is to be an overlooked option.

Not directly related but this Gabe quote still seems somewhat fitting: "Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem"

Yeah, had Valve tried to push Linux again without trying to make it accessible for the average user it would have flopped like the Steam machine. Or at the very least users would have tossed Linux for Windows. Accessibility is very important, and technical users should not be looked to as guides on what is acceptable for the masses.

Because they should be able to make a launcher that works. The Windows GOG launcher (GOG Galaxy) is a joke. They want to make one launcher to rule them all but it struggles with almost every one. I have a Windows computer for games that require it (Valorant mostly for me) and even on PC I use Heroic. I don't want crazy features. I just want an officially supported GOG client that works well on Linux and Windows.

Galaxy works fine on windows. It's far more stable than steam btw.

In the meantime heroic or lutris work very well. So why is there even a need for something else? I'd argue it's better if a company don't hold your game hostage for you to play them.

"It's far more stable than steam btw."

I'll admit I've only used Linux for the past 5-6 years, but I think the last time steam crashed for me was almost a decade ago or something? Is it not stable on windows anymore?

It does crash regularly, or it stops working and you need to restart it, and it always did this kind of thing. The obnoxious "I need to update before you're allowed to play" is hardly a selling feature. The videos and the adds are both obnoxious and intensive on resources.

Galaxy has its ups and downs, but overall I feel its lighter and much more responsive. The interface is much less cluttered, much more logical and clear. And it's not a fucking drm.

I thank vavle for what did for Linux gaming. Proton is brilliant and incredibly useful and valuable. But I also despise them for steam being litteraly a DRM. So I will forgive cdpr if they need time to develop galaxy on Linux and I'll use lutris and heroic game launcher in the meantime.

It is trivial to disable all the video content (and some more) on steam if you happen to be on low-end hardware that needs that (or just if you don’t like it, really)

It does crash regularly, or it stops working and you need to restart it, and it always did this kind of thing.

Then you use it wrong. No idea how that's possible but I run Steam on Windows, macOS, and Linux and except very early in the life cycle of the Steam Deck, I can't remember Steam ever crashing on me in the last 10 or so years.

"you use it wrong"... Of course... It cannot possibly be the fault of a shitty software and it must be me...

It cannot possibly be the fault of a shitty software and it must be me…

If you were correct, there'd be widespread reports of crashes. While no software is always free of bugs, if a piece of software is crashing for you all the time and hardy for everybody else, it's the logical conclusion that the underlying problem is on your side, probably by installing unstable drivers.

Hahaha like people will fill a bug report everytime a software crash... I wonder whether you're delusional or blinded by your faith into this piece if shit of a software.

I have the exact opposite experience as you. I have never once seen steam crash. My steam account is now 9 years old. I was absolutely stoked when I saw GOG Galaxy was trying to handle not only GOG games but games from other platforms as well. But my experience with that has been so bad. It's fine for GOG games, but I'd much rather just add all my games into steam at this point. So as for stability, I don't see any way that GOG Galaxy could ever beat Steam.

For Linux support, Steam is a DRM which is a detractor. But with all they've done with proton, steam input, steam deck OS.. I'd say that Steam is definitely doing more for the Linux ecosystem than GOG.

Steam has been working on the steam deck for how long now? 5? 10 years? Gog has that much time to catch up.

And as I said, I don't deny the role steam played and is still playing for Linux gaming. But it's still a drm. And that's something I simply cannot ignore.

I do use steam mind you. But I'll use and support gog everytime I can. If steam did the most for Linux, gog did and still do the most for players.

Because consumers are lazy and don't care about ownership.