I know you don't think you are, but you're really misguided and have been taken in by some messed up propaganda. You're missing SO much but I get it's popular to rag on Israel and the US right now, so it's kind of easy to just go with the flow.
Two days ago, hundreds of innocent people were ambushed and murdered at a music festival by some Palestinians.
A terrorist attack, just like telling people to shelter in a specific place and then bombing them is a terrorist attack.
I'm pointing out the vastly different treatment given to terror attacks depending on who did them.
On Principle I'm against treating some murders of civilians as less important or more excusable than other murders of civilians because of the "side" who did the deed, and weaponize for propaganda murders in the same manipulative way as used in marketing to sell shaving cream or fast food.
I'm quite curious about what actual Principle anchors your idea that "judging the killing of people for the purpose of terrifying the rest exactly the same no mater who does it" is "misguided".
You’re missing SO much but I get it’s popular to rag on Israel and the US right now
it’s popular to rag on Israel and the US right now
Where are you that this is a "popular" stance?
Lemmy
Where are you that this is a “popular” stance?
It gets confusing with the various Lemmy instances.
These people need to go outside and touch grass. The Internet ≠ real life
Bro we can skip back two days before that too and all it would show is an exchange basically daily but with a massive disparity of force up to this point.
I know you don't think you are, but you're really misguided and have been taken in by some messed up propaganda. You're missing SO much but I get it's popular to rag on Israel and the US right now, so it's kind of easy to just go with the flow.
Two days ago, hundreds of innocent people were ambushed and murdered at a music festival by some Palestinians.
A terrorist attack, just like telling people to shelter in a specific place and then bombing them is a terrorist attack.
I'm pointing out the vastly different treatment given to terror attacks depending on who did them.
On Principle I'm against treating some murders of civilians as less important or more excusable than other murders of civilians because of the "side" who did the deed, and weaponize for propaganda murders in the same manipulative way as used in marketing to sell shaving cream or fast food.
I'm quite curious about what actual Principle anchors your idea that "judging the killing of people for the purpose of terrifying the rest exactly the same no mater who does it" is "misguided".
Where are you that this is a "popular" stance?
Lemmy
It gets confusing with the various Lemmy instances.
These people need to go outside and touch grass. The Internet ≠ real life
Bro we can skip back two days before that too and all it would show is an exchange basically daily but with a massive disparity of force up to this point.