Sanders calls Israel's siege on Gaza 'a serious violation of international law'

return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 1248 points –
Sanders calls Israel's siege on Gaza 'a serious violation of international law'
politico.com
216

You are viewing a single comment

By only condemning human rights violations by Hamas and tacitly approving bigger war crimes by Israel, our American and European leaders are choosing sides in a very obvious and hypocritical manner.

We are unnecessarily antagonizing a billion Muslims and making ourselves a target for terrorism by blindly supporting an unjust apartheid state.

I don't want to on the side of Hamas, but I also don't want to be on the side of Israel.

Why drag us into this?

USA and rest of the Western world has enabled Israel for the last 70 years while the Palestinians have been systematically disenfranchised and radicalized. No one put in geniune effort to de-escalate this situation and now shit has hit the fan.

Are you a bot? Because you have your account set as one.

Hamas: murders a thousand I Innocent people, rapes a bunch of women (and by that I include girls), and murders a bunch of babies

Leftists: Well that's what they get for existing where they were existing.

Yeah that's exactly what they said...

If you're supporting Hamas you are evil. I don't have any interest in any nuance in this situation. They are terrorists that use human shields. There's nothing you can say that makes that ok, full stop. You are one of the evil people if you agree with Hamas.

The thing is that you're saying a bunch of people support Hamas when they obviously don't.

The IDF is dropping white phosphorus on children's hospitals, a blatant display of cruelty that makes no pretense of being necessary to fight Hamas. As evil as Hamas is, and I'm not downplaying that at all, the Israeli government is worse.

Most western countries feel and are guilty because they repeatedly killed and exiled Jews and promised them land as retribution that didn't belong to them in the first place.

About 1/3 of the people living in Palestine were jewish at the time of the partitition. Are you saying the entirety of land should have been given to the muslims?

No. I think there is no fair solution as long as both groups demand it all should belong to them. They will both feel wronged. I am also pretty sure that pressure on the Jewish population would have increased there when Israel would not have been formed.

Ok, but then where does this lead us? Are the jews more wrong than the muslims in trying to kill the other one? Is anyone supporting either side more wrong than the other? Us on the sidelines can condemn the cruelty but at the core there's no clear cut right and wrong like when Native Americans were wiped out by colonists...

In a better world maybe the UN would have enforced the partitition and after several generations shit would have cooled down. But that's something that was impossible in '48

I hope you aren't really asking me that lol. I have no idea. Apart from suggesting they should all just love each other and shake hands I don't know what else could work.

But historically I think there is no example where a division of a country has worked out. Korea, Vietnam, Germany,... It was always a disaster.

And how would you even fairly split Jerusalem, for example?

Chechoslowakia?

Jerusalem was not to be split in the UN plan, but given a special status