Gamers enraged at Ubisoft for injecting ads into the middle of video gamesLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.world – 1315 points – 11 months agotechspot.com324Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentUbisoft did one good thing in my book: Rayman. That's it.Ubisoft made splinter cell, farcry 2, ghost recon, and rocksmith. They did a lot of good things over the years. Problem is, they've changed.They made a lot of good games back in the day. Ubisoft used to be known for their quality, and they still have a lot of very talented developers under their belt. The problem, as usual, is management and players with low standards. The talented developers don't get to do more because players are willing to accept less. So that's what management tells them to do. The key is to have higher standards, but nobody wants to admit they got suckered into buying or liking shit.Anno, Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Asscreed Black Flag, Far Cry 3.None even remotely interests me.1 more...
Ubisoft did one good thing in my book: Rayman. That's it.Ubisoft made splinter cell, farcry 2, ghost recon, and rocksmith. They did a lot of good things over the years. Problem is, they've changed.They made a lot of good games back in the day. Ubisoft used to be known for their quality, and they still have a lot of very talented developers under their belt. The problem, as usual, is management and players with low standards. The talented developers don't get to do more because players are willing to accept less. So that's what management tells them to do. The key is to have higher standards, but nobody wants to admit they got suckered into buying or liking shit.Anno, Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Asscreed Black Flag, Far Cry 3.None even remotely interests me.1 more...
Ubisoft made splinter cell, farcry 2, ghost recon, and rocksmith. They did a lot of good things over the years. Problem is, they've changed.
They made a lot of good games back in the day. Ubisoft used to be known for their quality, and they still have a lot of very talented developers under their belt. The problem, as usual, is management and players with low standards. The talented developers don't get to do more because players are willing to accept less. So that's what management tells them to do. The key is to have higher standards, but nobody wants to admit they got suckered into buying or liking shit.
Ubisoft did one good thing in my book: Rayman. That's it.
Ubisoft made splinter cell, farcry 2, ghost recon, and rocksmith. They did a lot of good things over the years. Problem is, they've changed.
They made a lot of good games back in the day.
Ubisoft used to be known for their quality, and they still have a lot of very talented developers under their belt.
The problem, as usual, is management and players with low standards.
The talented developers don't get to do more because players are willing to accept less. So that's what management tells them to do.
The key is to have higher standards, but nobody wants to admit they got suckered into buying or liking shit.
Anno, Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Asscreed Black Flag, Far Cry 3.
None even remotely interests me.