Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to Programmer Humor@programming.dev – 2507 points –
409

You are viewing a single comment

No, that wasn't the intention of your original reply. Makes no sense in the context of your original response. Just goalposts you've moved after the fact.

No, that wasn’t the intention of your original reply. Makes no sense in the context of your original response. Just goalposts you’ve moved after the fact.

You're being intellectually dishonest. I explaned truthfully what my implied thoughts were, in detail, which justified the point I was making.

You can't change them just because you want to win an Internet point.

No I'm not. Your explanations do not align with what you quoted and stated in your initial replies. They're poor attempts at retroactively making it seem like you were implying something you obviously weren't.

No I’m not. Your explanations do not align with what you quoted and stated in your initial replies. They’re poor attempts at retroactively making it seem like you were implying something you obviously weren’t.

I disagree. I stand by what I've said.

Nope, you're pretty clearly lying to save face.

I'm not lying. I stand by what I've said.

Yes you are.

Wow, ok, I guess my next line would be then ...

NO U!!1!!!!!!!

We done?

Your next line can be whatever you want. Including more lying about what you previously said.

Nobody's going to believe it though.

10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...