Innocent until proven guilty only applies in the courts. For everywhere else, it seems to be guilty until proven innocent, and sometimes still guilty despite proof.
That's because most people are complete fucking morons.
It's nothing something we should ever remain silent on and let be acceptable.
So you'd be totally ok letting someone, who you've seen on video beating a child, babysit for you? After all, innocent until proven guilty
Are you a fucking idiot?
If you watch someone do the thing, you can be pretty assured they are guilty of doing the thing.
Allegedly
It’s not ann allegation if you’ve seen it happen.
It literally is. This thread is about assumption of innocence until convicted.
YOU HAVE PROOF OF THEM DOING IT
But legally, proof isnt "proof" until a jury has reviewed and determined on it
who you’ve seen on video beating a child,
In this scenario, you yourself are the judge and have viewed the video footage.
That's the entire fucking point dude. You're always the judge.
Innocent until proven guilty only applies in the courts. For everywhere else, it seems to be guilty until proven innocent, and sometimes still guilty despite proof.
That’s because most people are complete fucking morons.
It’s nothing something we should ever remain silent on and let be acceptable.
This is the entire start of the thread. We don't need to wait for the courts. It's entirely justifiable to make up your mind with whatever evidence is presented, regardless if it's enough to actually convict in court
Innocent until proven guilty only applies in the courts. For everywhere else, it seems to be guilty until proven innocent, and sometimes still guilty despite proof.
That's because most people are complete fucking morons.
It's nothing something we should ever remain silent on and let be acceptable.
So you'd be totally ok letting someone, who you've seen on video beating a child, babysit for you? After all, innocent until proven guilty
Are you a fucking idiot?
If you watch someone do the thing, you can be pretty assured they are guilty of doing the thing.
Allegedly
It’s not ann allegation if you’ve seen it happen.
It literally is. This thread is about assumption of innocence until convicted.
YOU HAVE PROOF OF THEM DOING IT
But legally, proof isnt "proof" until a jury has reviewed and determined on it
In this scenario, you yourself are the judge and have viewed the video footage.
That's the entire fucking point dude. You're always the judge.
This is the entire start of the thread. We don't need to wait for the courts. It's entirely justifiable to make up your mind with whatever evidence is presented, regardless if it's enough to actually convict in court
Especially if it's a man being accussed