Oklahoma judge rules a man who wrongfully spent nearly 50 years in prison for murder is innocent

girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.world – 430 points –
Oklahoma judge rules a man who wrongfully spent nearly 50 years in prison for murder is innocent
apnews.com

Glynn Simmons, 71, who was released in July after prosecutors agreed that key evidence in his case was not turned over to his defense lawyers, was ruled innocent Tuesday.

“This court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the offense for which Mr. Simmons was convicted, sentenced and imprisoned... was not committed by Mr. Simmons,” according to the ruling by Oklahoma County District Judge Amy Palumbo.

The ruling makes Simmons eligible for up to $175,000 in compensation from the state for wrongful conviction and opens the door for a federal lawsuit against Oklahoma City and law enforcement involved in Simmons’ arrest and conviction, defense attorney Joe Norwood said Wednesday.

Compensation, though, is likely years away, Norwood said and Simmons is currently living on donations while undergoing treatment for cancer that was detected after his release from prison.

“Glynn is having to live off of GoFundMe, that’s literally how the man is surviving right now, paying rent, buying food,” Norwood said. “Getting him compensation, and getting compensation is not for sure, is in the future and he has to sustain himself now.”

54

You are viewing a single comment

So the prosecutor is going to be held liable for stealing 50 years of this man's life, right?

Compensation, though, is likely years away, Norwood said and Simmons is currently living on donations while undergoing treatment for cancer that was detected after his release from prison.

Reminds me of that joke, what did the wrongfully convicted man, who spent 50 years in prison because a prosecutor hid exonerating evidence, get for Christmas? Cancer.

The world is a chaotic, horrid unforgiving place. Have fun while you can because any second now who the fuck knows what's going to happen to any of us.

I get what you're saying, but I've also seen similar sentiment used to justify cruelty, as if the unpredictable nature of existence somehow absolves people of actively contributing to the misery of others.

1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...