You understand how the internet protocol works right. This argument has been going for a long time now. Yes, they gave up IP address because they couldn't win in court. They're like the only company who will fight tooth and nail for you in court but the feds ordered them to do so, so they had to comply. The messages were all end to end encrypted and other than what metadata was requested, they didn't get much.
Edit: Additionally, if you use protonvpn, mullvad, or any no-log vpn, you would probably be immune to this.
Yeah, based on a legal request - that's how it should be. Our problems are not police listening in on criminals but unwarranted mass-surveillance.
Email by its nature is not private or secure. You can do all sorts of things to try and make it private or secure but at the end of the day it's still email. It's going to sit somewhere plain text.
If you want a secure communication channel use something like signal.
People spend a lot of time and money trying to fight with the nature of email.
That's my problem with proton as their marketing would lead you to believe their email is completely encrypted. Their marketing really needs a asterisk that tells you exactly what is encrypted and when.
They did not disclosing any content of any email. They disclosed the very little they have. Once they have been forced to log IP addresses and that was turned to law enforcement, another time they were forced to disclose a recovery email address. These facts if anything should help build trust in proton, as they show how little they collect and therefore can disclose. With signal is the same, they collect super minimal info (the time you last logged in and a couple more data points, I think), and that's what they disclosed in the past.
PROTON WORKS WITH THE FEDS PROTON WORKS WITH THE FEDS PROTON WORKS WITH THE FEDS PROTON WORKS WITH THE FEDS ProtonMail Gives Up Logs on User, Then Scrubs Website of No IP Logging Claims it gave out thousands of ip adresses over the years
You understand how the internet protocol works right. This argument has been going for a long time now. Yes, they gave up IP address because they couldn't win in court. They're like the only company who will fight tooth and nail for you in court but the feds ordered them to do so, so they had to comply. The messages were all end to end encrypted and other than what metadata was requested, they didn't get much.
Edit: Additionally, if you use protonvpn, mullvad, or any no-log vpn, you would probably be immune to this.
Company does a thing required by law.
Pikachu face.
Yeah, based on a legal request - that's how it should be. Our problems are not police listening in on criminals but unwarranted mass-surveillance.
Email by its nature is not private or secure. You can do all sorts of things to try and make it private or secure but at the end of the day it's still email. It's going to sit somewhere plain text.
If you want a secure communication channel use something like signal.
People spend a lot of time and money trying to fight with the nature of email.
That's my problem with proton as their marketing would lead you to believe their email is completely encrypted. Their marketing really needs a asterisk that tells you exactly what is encrypted and when.
They did not disclosing any content of any email. They disclosed the very little they have. Once they have been forced to log IP addresses and that was turned to law enforcement, another time they were forced to disclose a recovery email address. These facts if anything should help build trust in proton, as they show how little they collect and therefore can disclose. With signal is the same, they collect super minimal info (the time you last logged in and a couple more data points, I think), and that's what they disclosed in the past.
It's a non-news.