The Pokemon Company releases a statement regarding Palworld: Inquiries Regarding Other Companies’ Games

Hal-5700X@lemmy.world to Games@sh.itjust.works – 44 points –
他社ゲームに関するお問い合わせについて|株式会社ポケモン|The Pokémon Company
corporate.pokemon.co.jp

Here’s a archive link, https://archive.ph/oT1L6

23

You are viewing a single comment

I don’t see Nintendo/Game Freak doing something about Palword. Due to Palworld's first trailer release two years ago. So if Nintendo/Game Freak was going to do something about Palworld. They had two years to do it.

They can only demand palworld to not advertise it as "pokemon with gun", otherwise they have no case against the uninspired monster design.

pokemon doesn't own the concept of monster colectors

The accusation isn't about the concept but the artwork.

Pokémon doesn't own the concept of cute magical anime animals either. Infact I'm pretty sure it's a common anime trope.

If they could do shit about this, Digimon and Yokai Watch would not exist.

I wonder. Does that also mean Fromsoft has a case against games marketing themselves as soulslikes?

They can try, nintendo never did, doubt they will win, and cost them the decades of good will they've gained. The genre name is either a part of the title mixed with the word clone, like, lite, or a portmanteau like Metroidvania, so it's not 100% case.

That's why Palworld did not mentioned Pokemon on the steam page and the trailer.

Don't give Nintendo or Konami ideas about Metroidvanias...

Jokes aside, IMO its a common term and like has been a thing for a long time, roguelike as an example

It's also good for business. If someone comes in not knowing about Souls games and starts seeing it, they'll wonder why it's called that.

I played both Metroid and Castlevania when I was a kid so I knew where those came from. I quit gaming for a decade or so and didn't know anything about Souls-like games when I got back. I started seeing it everywhere and it made me curious. Now I'm a fan of From and games like what they put out.

Can you imagine the ego stroking it must be to have an entire genre named after your work?

They probably could have had a case against the first game to market itself as such, but I think once the terminology gets utilized as a "common term", you can't do anything. It's why Nintendo in the 80s and 90s was so fucking adamant on pushing parents away from calling any and every home game console a Nintendo

Fromsoft would have 0 ground if they wanted to today, but honestly, again, I think it's one of those things thats such a pedestal that there would be no reason to go after it.

Imagine what the developers of Rogue must feel. Games in that vein are still called Rogue-likes 43 years later

3 more...
3 more...