Biden says he'll shut down the border if deal gives him authority

MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 339 points –
Biden says he'll shut down the border if deal gives him authority
politico.com

The White House statement comes after a week of frantic negotiations in the Senate.

President Joe Biden on Friday urged Congress to pass a bipartisan bill to address the immigration crisis at the nation’s southern border, saying he would shut down the border the day the bill became law.

“What’s been negotiated would — if passed into law — be the toughest and fairest set of reforms to secure the border we’ve ever had in our country,” Biden said in a statement. “It would give me, as President, a new emergency authority to shut down the border when it becomes overwhelmed. And if given that authority, I would use it the day I sign the bill into law.”

Biden’s Friday evening statement resembles a ramping up in rhetoric for the administration, placing the president philosophically in the camp arguing that the border may hit a point where closure is needed. The White House’s decision to have Biden weigh in also speaks to the delicate nature of the dealmaking, and the urgency facing his administration to take action on the border — particularly during an election year, when Republicans have used the issue to rally their base.

The president is also daring Republicans to reject the deal as it faces a make-or-break moment amid GOP fissures.

255

You are viewing a single comment

Because this will undercut the only politically popular Republican position, which Republicans are currently wielding as a cudgel against the Biden Administration. In the process, Republicans are treating the people crossing the border worse and worse, increasing human suffering. If Biden can take control of the narrative of the border, there is a real possibility he can start to make things better and decrease human suffering.

If Biden can take control of the narrative of the border, there is a real possibility he can start to make things better and decrease human suffering.

There's a possibility he can, but no possibility he will.

What other option does the Biden administration have when working with Republican border states, a split Congress, and a massive right-wing media megaphone of disinformation?

The great thing is that no matter how much he capitulates, Republicans will immediately scream that the borders are wide open.

He could be invading Mexico and shooting anything that moves and Republicans wouldn't accept it as enough.

Partly true. So do nothing and accept that a majority of independents and even a sizable chunk of Democrats have concern over the (admittedly inflated) "border issue"?

No matter what Biden does, Republicans will ignore it and scream "open borders" anyway.

He gains nothing from this but the sheer joy Democrats experience when they throw vulnerable minorities under the bus.

Of course Republicans will. We write them off.

But we're talking about swing voters and independents, and even some Democrats who have this as a top issue.

You lose those, you lose the election, and now life gets very bad for immigrants and minorities for years to come.

Of course Republicans will. We write them off.

We do? Because it sure looks like we're appeasing them.

But we’re talking about swing voters and independents, and even some Democrats who have this as a top issue.

They know better and choose to accept Republican bullshit already. They're gonna keep accepting Republican bullshit.

You lose those, you lose the election, and now life gets very bad for immigrants and minorities for years to come.

And when this round of appeasements fails to work, the same rhetoric will persist and continue to work. And we'll keep hearing that we need to treat them worse and worse to appease people for whom treating them worse is the only goal.

I say again:

  • The border issue is a top concern for independents, swing voters, and even many Democrats, based on polling just this week.

  • If Democrats don't win the independents and swing-voters, they lose. Period.

  • When they lose, you may be happy with your pyrrhic victory, but immigrants and minorities under Trump and Republicans sure won't. Congratulations. You just accelerated the pain and misery for these people.

Unless you can tell me how Democrats can magically win without actually appealing to what independents and swing voters' are telling you is their top concern, then I think we're done here because this defies all reason and patterns of election history.

If you're pissed off that Democrats are doing this, perhaps you should redirect your focus on why these people believe this is an issue in the first place and address the root of the problem.

And it just so happens that when you discover the root of the problem is right-wing media propaganda and its grip on the national narrative, one realizes democrats must often play the game under this unfortunate reality. Because while you're busy driving wedges on Democrats, Republicans rhetoric is lockstep.

I'll say it again: capitulation won't work.

I know it'll make you feel good to throw desperate people under the bus, but that's all this will accomplish.

Losing won't work either. Have to face the brutal reality of elections somehow.

But do go into the oval office and tell Biden, "I know a large amount of Democrats and I know a majority of independents and swing voters cite this as their top issue, but I really think you should do nothing because your hands are tied anyway by Republicans. So yeah, don't even bother appealing to them! Trust me. This is a winning election strategy!"

2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...

I mean, we’re currently seeing exactly how much Biden thinks of poor brown people.

Spoiler alert it’s not very much, it might even be a negative amount.

2 more...
2 more...

"Just a few hundreds more people in concentration camps and thousands more deported, and we can finally stop the Republicans from imprisoning and deporting immigrants and refugees!"

Democrats having a normal one about human rights, eh?

Edit: This may be a good place to remind everyone that the people we're de facto targeting with these policies are people with indigenous roots. This can and should be interpreted through the lens of colonialism and our ongoing genocide against Native groups.

Edit 2: Oh boy I cannot believe I have to say this, but these people with indigenous roots are not limited to Mexico and Central America. Does anyone know anything about history here?? My God, I'd assume if one is going to comment that one would at least have the slightest idea what they're talking about.

Edit 3: And to the people who think it's some kinda "gotcha" to point out that I'm disengaging from people who are shit-deep in the anti-immigrant hysteria, you got me. Nearly half my family are immigrants, some of whom have been detained and/or deported by our racist border policy, and I live surrounded by batshit conservatives. So yes, this is a sensitive and personal issue to me. If I wanted to talk to people like that, I'd go to the gas station or bar. Lemmy is my opportunity to talk to people who at the bare minimum agree on certain fundamental ideals, an opportunity I don't have much in real life. I will block and report you for name calling or other uncivilized attacks on my character.

What, in the purview of an election year (and risk of putting someone obviously orders-of-magnitude worse for such people), with the right-wing border propaganda resonating with many voters, with GOP border states that don't actually want to work with Biden, and with a divided Congress, do you want Biden to do?

It's one thing to throw peanuts from the peanut gallery, but another to look at the pragmatic reality and actual viable options versus consequences.

Treating people's lives like political pawns in a campaign is NOT okay. Stop trying to normalize this shit.

Don't ever speak to me again. Enabling this shit is a horrible thing to do to people. Let's put you in a camp or send you into a violent situation and see how much you like it. "BuT iT's ElEcTiOn YeAr" I don't care

I say again since you're obviously deflecting: It’s one thing to throw peanuts from the peanut gallery, but another to look at the pragmatic reality and actual viable options versus consequences.

You can live with your idealistic pyrrhic victory while you naively reject the reality of the political consequences and put someone far worse in power. But you do you, buddy.

I wish we could be idealistic, but the reality is that too many people are under informed, under educated, or otherwise trained to blame the country's problems on minorities.

The idealists in this thread thinking "let's say the right thing now, let the bad guys take over, then we'll just have a little 'ol revolution" have their heads up their asses. They need to take a serious look at the middle east and their royals in golden palaces. That is the Republican end game.

People like them have no actual solution, they just like screaming that you're wrong while they're right.

It's almost like dealing with a MAGAt.

To have a solution, you first must have a problem. This isn't one. It's only a problem for racists.

Oh, how awfully convenient!

But true, it's better defined as a dilemma. The dichotomy between doing nothing because one's hands are tied, or investing in a move that gives you power to address it down the road.

... You know... By not handing the keys back to the real racist.

But some people don't think that many chess moves ahead, I guess.

Frankly it makes me wonder if they are. Unfortunately we know it's a common tactic for them to pretend they're leftist and wedge-drive to sow apathy.

How many genocide did Trump support and enable again?

Oh I don't know...

When you say you trust Putin's word over the consensus of your own intelligence agencies, I'd argue enabling Russia's genocide against Ukraine is one.

When you buddy up with the North Korean leader, you're at least endorsing the famine of their people.

When you undermine peace deals with Iran, you undermine regional stability indirectly leading to further deaths both domestically and externally.

... Though let's not forget that neither the UN nor ICJ has formally ruled on genocide charges.

And sure, let's just pretend you're not oversimplifying the situation in order to obviously wedge-drive all the while pretending Trump is some leader of global peace LOL.

So how many weapons did we send to ACTIVELY engage in genocide?

Trump was a fucking horrible person but he was way too fucking inept of a moron to pull off anything big.

Biden fucking tricked us all into thinking he was a fucking good guy.

Hell he tricked me pretty good.

Not sure but a reminder that Trump directly killed more civilians from US air strikes in the year of 2017 than Obama and Biden, combined. So there's that.

Trump may or may not be a moron, but his cabinet was not. From Richard Spencer to Bill Barr to Pompeo to Homan -- It was full of evil fucking psychopaths and if you're unfamiliar with Project 2025 you best familiarize yourself with it. It's no different than Bush Jr., and the neocons he was surrounded by.

Biden is in a tricky spot that I do not envy. While it's very pleasant to the brain to think in absolutes, there are major consequences to these decisions that can have major implications in the election ahead... Which again, we do not wish to hand the keys to someone who trusts the likes of Putin and kisses Netanyahu's ass just the same.

To Biden's credit his tone has shifted significantly on Israel, going from lockstep support to publicly calling Israel's attacks, "Indiscriminate Bombing." He's already denied them advanced military aid packages like Apache Helicopters, and has met with Netanyahu trying to force them to dial back the conflict. Calling it genocide publicly will do little substantively but to close the door to any diplomacy and influence Biden has with Netanyahu in the first place.

I am so grateful that he gave them slightly less weapons than they asked for.

It sure cancels out all the ones he did

Yeah well, just you wait for what fellow right-wing nationalist Trump -- who unlike Biden has not called for mitigating civilian casualties -- will give him. And let's not forget that Trump already vowed to not let any Palestinian refugees into America.

But yes, please proceed with this totally good faith argument totally not rooted in blatant false equivalence.

Calling me right wing nationalist won’t work when everyone can look at my post history and see exactly when I changed from supporting him to hating him.

It started with the railroad strike and completed when he enabled and supported the killing of thousands of innocent children and babies.

Fuck him and his support of this bullshit, fuck Hamas for starting it, and hopefully Netanyahu and his crewwill suffer being the only survivors of anyone they care about and have to live with the loneliness and guilt of being the only survivor when everyone else is dead.

Although he would probably just like it

Relax, I wasn't calling you a right wing nationalist, though you're excelling as a useful wedge-driving pawn for said right-wingers. I was calling Netanyahu and Trump right-wing nationalists.

Welcome to the world of reality and gray areas where it's probably more complicated than you care to comprehend. Be that as it may, Trump would undeniably be worse.

And no, it didn't start with Hamas lol. Laughable ignorance to history to believe this war began on October 7th.

10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
10 more...
18 more...
18 more...

Most of these people are not indigenous through coming from way, farther down south, and Central America and moving their way up through Mexico because of how bad it is where they’re from.

If you are going to do it do it right and tell everyone the w whole story

18 more...
20 more...