Math question: how do we get an irrational number pi from the ratio of circumference and the diameter of a circle?

Twoafros@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world – 49 points –

I am wrong in thinking the circumference or the diameter of a circle has to be rational?

42

You are viewing a single comment

What's interesting is that no matter how big or how small your circle is, pi is a constant ratio of the diameter to the perimeter (or circumference) of your circle. If you were to cut a string to the length of your circle's diameter, it WILL take 3.14 lengths of string to wrap around the circle (or π times). That's where that number comes from.

Because of this ratio, there will never be a situation in which both the diameter and circumference are both rational numbers at the same time. Either your Diameter is a rational number or your circumference. For example:

P=πD

If D=1... Then P=π(1) or P=π

If P=1... Then P=π(1/π) where D=(1/π)

huh - I never thought of it that way but of course it makes total sense.

I love this question - simple but thought provoking!

Logical numbers?

*rational

Good catch. Fixed. I apparently suck with words sometimes. Intent good. Execution flawed. :)

If you were to cut a string to the length of your circle' diameter, it WILL ALWAYS wrap around by 3.14159 (or π times).

Isn't that backwards?

Nope.

The equation is P=πD. Meaning the Perimeter is equal to 3.14 times the length of your Diameter.

You can visualize it here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1lQfERPjkzk

Right, so you'd need 3.14 strings of length D to cover the circle, D wouldn't wrap around it itself.

It was implied that it would wrap around the circle. I'll update original post to clarify better.

Yeah that's what I gathered, but it's backwards. C = Pi D means you need pi strings, not that it'll cover the circle pi times.

Ahhhh. I see what your saying. It's fixed.

Yeah. Did not mean to intend that it wraps fully around the circle pi times. Good catch.

1 more...
1 more...