If "Master/Slave" terminology in computing sounds bad now, why not change it to "Dom/Sub"?

Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world – 609 points –

It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology's problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

433

You are viewing a single comment

I use 'main' on git instead of 'master' now (forced to change at work) and its shorter and snappier IMO.

But yeah there are more important problems out there.

The master in master branch is, I'd assume, from the idea of Master copy which refers to the original of something, eg a recording, drawing, etc. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/master-copy

I'm not hugely tied to the word, and things change ... So meh.

While I agree with your assumption, I think main is less vague. Master can be interpreted several ways, including an offensive one. So while I agree with other commenter in that it's unnecessary to go back and change things retroactively, but just setting the default branch name for new repos in your version control to main is a fair thing to ask IMO.

including an offensive one.

Is the code going to be offended? If so it's probably already offended by it's likely very bad code quality and lack of maintenance and repair.

Not the code, but some of your coworkers might potentially be offended.

Also good job with the ad hominem.

obviously the code wont be offended, i was just shitposting.

As for the code quality, it's not adhom, it's literally just true. Go ask any seasoned programmer, any senior dev, or any junior dev, they'll tell you it's all dogshit, except for the one pet project they have that hasn't ballooned into a mess yet.

And if you need proof, go load a website, tell me how clean and responsive it is. Surely it has no issues, and works on a cross platform standard. Oh wait it doesn't, surely that's do to a feature difference right? What's that? Spoofing the user agent fixes it? Hmm.

Oh, as a programmer myself I'm perfectly aware of how shitty most codebases are. It's just that the context you said this in implied that people who care about political correctness are worse programmers. Dont act like this wasn't on purpose and hide behind "shitposting".

I insist on renaming main to master every time I create a repo on GitLab. Master forever, even if it doesn't make much sense.

That makes no sense whatsoever.

It makes sense because "master copy" is the name of the "official" version of something. Nothing to do with slavery by the way.

But "Main" is more clear, and putting in extra effort to basically just piss off politically (over)correct people doesn't make any sense, and is kinda weird tbh

It’s already not the master copy if you have release branches or tags, but it is the “main” branch 🤪

I don't know about Scrollone, but I hate it when corporations force me to change for the sake of change. Options to change is fine (in case someone doesn't like the default), of course.

And no, "inclusivity" is not the actual reason, as that's already covered by adding the option to change (which again, is completely fine)

4 more...

So you are not passively against progress, you are doing it actively.

Has very much "vinyl is better than modern media" vibes.

4 more...
5 more...