Is there a more politically conservative part of the fediverse?locked

Snowman44@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world – 42 points –

I'm a conservative. I don't mind the liberal stuff here. It's good to learn the other side, but I don't want a liberal echo chamber. I'd like to be more politically balanced in the fediverse. Is there any way I can do that?

280

You are viewing a single comment

If you have only two choices and both are bad, you have to choose the lesser evil. The OP probably doesn't like the racism and stuff, but they dislike certain policies of the other party even more.

Also, “trying to make it harder for people to vote” is an interesting way to say “requiring people to bring their citizen ID when voting, like in any civilized country”.

I would say that the dismantling of human rights would be a greater evil than the things the democrats could cook up, but if you are not affected and have no empathy for others it could be better to vote for the republicans.

And werent the conditions to be able to vote pretty restrictive to a lot of people?

I live in a country where identification is required for voting and it doesn't feel restrictive. On the contrary, I'm glad someone can't just vote in my name.

In the US the largest group of people without id's are Democrats and black.

It's literally making the system more racist.

Every black person has an ID, you have to otherwise you can't do anything anyways. I have never met anyone in my community who doesn't have some form of ID that's valid in elections.

So the question is, why doesn't everyone have IDs? How does the country identify its citizens?

IDs cost money, require visits to DMVs (which conservatives work hard to shut down in poor areas, or other fuckery with their hours or such), and if you want the federal level one cost more and require more paperwork

We use the garbage and not-designed-for-this social security number for major IDing

Because the republicans work very hard to make it difficult for people who would likely vote democrat.

If you got an ID sent to you when you turned $AGE I'd support requiring it to vote. But any proposal of free/automatic IDs gets shouted down by fanatics who think it's the mark of the beast from Revelations. It's a non-starter.

In my country:

  • We have a mandatory national ID
  • Having it automatically registers you as a voter after 16 y.o.
  • Voting is mandatory between 18 and 70.
  • We vote on Sundays to ensure everyone can go.
  • Voting in always in person. We usually use schools to that end, windows are obscured to ensure secrecy.
  • We record who voted following the electoral registry. Only the last issued national ID is valid to vote.
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...

There's far more to making voting more difficult than just requiring an ID. For example, I believe it was Texas that relatively recently lowered its number of voting stations in left-leaning areas and made it illegal to give people water that were waiting in line to vote.

1 more...