Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing"

kpw@kbin.social to Technology@lemmy.world – 1729 points –
pluralistic.net

The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you've already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

498

You are viewing a single comment

People are always on here arguing about whether pirating is stealing or not. I do think it’s stealing I just can’t bring myself to give a fuck about these large corporations. They have been stealing from the people for years.

Yeah I really don't care if I'm stealing in this context, I care if I'm stealing from independent content creators. Another thing is I know I can't afford all the music I listen to, but I can afford to go to shows of my favorite artists. Piracy is often completely transparent of any content distribution strategies so I find it a great way to explore music.

I'd probably argue digital piracy isn't theft. It's quality control.

you cant steal something that isnt fucking physically real

am i stealing smells and sounds from my neighbors

no democrat city judge would side with a corpo over a random joe with a bangin lawyer

Your last sentence sounds unhinged but I agree wtiu the rest

What would you call it if you make a contract with a gardener, they make your entire garden and then you don't pay them. Since it's not stealing, where is the harm, right?

You're stealing their time. That's not really comparable since the people who made the tv show or movie you're pirating have already been paid.

Do you believe actors etc. would still keep getting paid if everyone would just pirate everything?

Do you believe there will ever be a time where everyone pirates everything?

Since the idea seems to be that pirating digital goods is a moral imperative, the question what are the consequences if everyone would do it is valid.

Er… first off, you signed a contract. Second, you’d be stealing their labor. Their physical labor.