Man accused of destroying Satanic Temple display at Iowa Capitol is now charged with hate crime

stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to News@lemmy.world – 1089 points – Man accused of destroying Satanic Temple display at Iowa Capitol is now charged with hate crime
apnews.com

A Mississippi man accused of destroying a statue of a pagan idol at Iowa’s state Capitol is now being charged with a hate crime.

153

You are viewing a single comment
View all comments

As he fucking should. He explicitly destroyed an approved religious statue on government property because it didn’t fit his religious beliefs. He* committed violence against the ST for religious reasons.

In tiers of ‘hate crime’ I wouldn’t put it up there with setting a cross on fire (which has other religious connotations) or fire bombing a church… but, fuck. We should all just respect each others’ equal rights to worship as we see fit, and if the government is going to permit one ideology to put up religious iconography on their grounds, then they must include the other religions.

...If the government is going to permit one ideology to put up religious iconography on their grounds, then they must include the other religions stop and take those down.

At the moment, SCOTUS treats no belief as a separate religion. In our life times we are going to have to aim for the more achievable “all religions matter”.

SCOTUS gets something wrong, what a shocker. You set your goals for how much progress you want to see in a lifetime and I'll set mine.

I’ll delete this response when you let me know, but the quoted format looks odd. I respect your position from what I can gather from the weird format, so please take a moment to edit and let me know when it’s done. I’d really like other viewers to see what you’re trying to articulate properly.

For reference, this is what it looks like for me (desktop firefox):

So, looks fine to me formatting-wise. I read the intent to be that (1) they're quoting you, and (2) they're conveying a government building should not be a place for religious iconography, at all.

I'd be happier if there would be no religious presence in government buildings too, but alas, the SC has ruled for what we've got. So I suppose it's nice at least that we've got TST to help ensure our governments aren't playing favorites

It must be the app, Memmy, that I’m using. It doesn’t show any formatting for me, just double spaces where they began and ended their formatting. I still gathered that was what they were sort of going for.

...If the government is going to permit one ideology to put up religious iconography on their grounds, then they must...

...stop and take those down.

Out of curiosity, does the earlier post's strikethrough for the part I've now removed show up for you? I've heard that some apps don't handle all of the formatting options particularly well.

What is the formatting used to denote strikethrough on lemmy? On Kbin it looks like it's ignoring it, but it has double tilde as a supported strikethrough formatter.

It must be the app, Memmy, that I’m using. It doesn’t show any formatting for me, just double spaces where you began and ended your formatting.

FWIW, I'm reading this thread in a Firefox browser on a PC and only the bolding works for me. I see the double-tildes at either end of what should be struck out text.

I’d put it on par with trespassing into a church and breaking the crosses. It’s destruction of other people’s shit because of the religion it represents but with no additional implications

Christians demand that acceptance while refusing it (literally to the point of violence) to anyone else.