Could I have made it more obvious what I was talking about than by stating those years and using the words "trials" instead of "charges"? like did you really think I was talking about those? JFC.
The article is talking specifically about the Jan 6 stuff, which he is facing a criminal trial over. In fact, when Mitch McConnell voted to acquit Trump in the impeachment for that, he directly stated that it was because it was more suitable for a criminal trial.
That doesn't mean I have to be limited to talking about that, and I made it REALLY obvious i wasn't.
Unfortunately It not obvious to me what trials you are talking about. I don't follow all the things that happen so forgive me. What trials are you talking about. I would be interesting in looking into them.
I'm.sorry for your massive comprehension issues. Now that it's been explicitly spelled out, you can see it, I hope.
You have shown massive difficulty with communicating your ideas. Stop blaming others for it.
You made no indication what you were talking about and you're "surprised" that people think you were talking about the article.
Ladies and gentlemen, the intelligence and honesty of trump supporters on full display right here.
You can't read
The problem is not my ability to read, but your inability to think outside of yourself. You'll continue to pretend it was clear because, again, you are so wrapped up in your own head that you can't even step outside of yourself and see a different perspective.
Which, again, is probably why you aren't smart enough to avoid defending trump here.
Could I have made it more obvious what I was talking about than by stating those years and using the words "trials" instead of "charges"? like did you really think I was talking about those? JFC.
The article is talking specifically about the Jan 6 stuff, which he is facing a criminal trial over. In fact, when Mitch McConnell voted to acquit Trump in the impeachment for that, he directly stated that it was because it was more suitable for a criminal trial.
That doesn't mean I have to be limited to talking about that, and I made it REALLY obvious i wasn't.
Unfortunately It not obvious to me what trials you are talking about. I don't follow all the things that happen so forgive me. What trials are you talking about. I would be interesting in looking into them.
I'm.sorry for your massive comprehension issues. Now that it's been explicitly spelled out, you can see it, I hope.
You have shown massive difficulty with communicating your ideas. Stop blaming others for it.
You've spelled out nothing but your own shortcomings.
You made no indication what you were talking about and you're "surprised" that people think you were talking about the article.
Ladies and gentlemen, the intelligence and honesty of trump supporters on full display right here.
You can't read
The problem is not my ability to read, but your inability to think outside of yourself. You'll continue to pretend it was clear because, again, you are so wrapped up in your own head that you can't even step outside of yourself and see a different perspective.
Which, again, is probably why you aren't smart enough to avoid defending trump here.
You’re defending Trump, therefore neither can you. ☺️