‘Media outlets are erasing Sinead O’Connor’s Muslim identity’

🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.worldmod to World News@lemmy.world – 412 points –
‘Media outlets are erasing Sinead O’Connor’s Muslim identity’
aljazeera.com

As musicians, politicians and fans remember Sinead O’Connor, some Muslims are disappointed that the Irish singer and lifelong activist’s religious identity is not being highlighted in tributes.

UK police on Wednesday said the 56-year-old was found unresponsive in her London residence on Wednesday and that there her death was not being treated as suspicious.

Since the news of her death, Muslim fans of the 90s superstar have said her conversion to Islam, a cornerstone of her identity, was inspiring, but that some media reports have failed to note her religious beliefs in obituaries.

O’Connor, whose chart-topping hit “Nothing Compares 2 U” helped her reach global stardom, converted to Islam in 2018.

“This is to announce that I am proud to have become a Muslim. This is the natural conclusion of any intelligent theologian‘s journey. All scripture study leads to Islam. Which makes all other scriptures redundant,” the songstress tweeted on October 19, 2018.

At that time, O’Connor tweeted selfies donning the Muslim headscarf, the hijab, and uploaded a video of her reciting the Islamic call to prayer, the azan.

She took on the Muslim name Shuhada’ Davitt – later changing it to Shuhada Sadaqat – but continued to use the name Sinead O’Connor professionally.

One social media user said imagery of the singer without the hijab points to the glaring lack of Muslim reporters in newsrooms.

Meanwhile, some said that O’Connor was an inspiration for queer Muslims globally.

In 2000, she came out as a lesbian during an interview. But the singer, who was married to multiple men throughout her life, later said that her sexuality was fluid and that she did not believe in labels.

Some found joy in O’Connor’s conversion growing up, seeing themselves represented, while others, just learning about her Muslim identity at the news of her death, also took inspiration.

O’Connor was no stranger to controversy.

A lifelong nonconformist, she was outspoken about religion, feminism, and war, as well as her own addiction and mental health issues.

In 2014, she refused to play in Israel.

“Let’s just say that, on a human level, nobody with any sanity, including myself, would have anything but sympathy for the Palestinian plight. There’s not a sane person on earth who in any way sanctions what the f*** the Israeli authorities are doing,” she told Hot Press, an Irish music magazine.

Her iconic shaved head and shapeless wardrobe defied early 90s popular culture’s notions of femininity and sexuality.

In 1992, she ripped up a photo of Pope John Paul II during a television appearance on Saturday Night Live, vocal against the Catholic Church’s history of child abuse.

The late former star was also a firm supporter of a united Ireland, under which the United Kingdom would relinquish control of Northern Ireland.

264

You are viewing a single comment

If you think its feminisn to tell a woman what shes should and shouldn't wear, I don't know what to tell you.

I'm not telling women to wear anything. Many militant islamists, however, have used hijabs to control women. Like it or not it's become a symbol of oppression as a result.

You're insuinating that feminism is incompatiable with women choosing what they wear if it's a garment you don't approve of. Feminism does not tell women what they can and cannot wear. Furthermore you claim its a hate image despite millions of Muslim women saying it's part of their culture and not representative of a radical minority. How many women do you intend on speaking over in your persuit of "feminism"?

Feminism is incompatible with sexism.

Something Islam teaches as a core concept.

You're insuinating that feminism is incompatiable with women choosing what they wear if it's a garment you don't approve of.

You could say the same thing about a Confederate flag though.

Not that I'm saying the two are comparable, but that it's not a very good argument.

That's because that was me telling the guy I responded to how he was implying it is in any way a type of feminism to tell someone what they can't wear after he said he never said what women should wear, not an argument why feminism doesn't tell people what to wear, or why the hijab is not a hate symbol. Though I suspect you just responded to whatever sentence you could think of a counter to so it doesn't much matter.

I really don't understand what this run on sentence means

You’re insuinating that feminism is incompatiable with women choosing what they wear if it’s a garment you don’t approve of.

What I'm actually saying is that wearing a garment that has been used to terrorize and oppress thousands of women is incompatible with feminism. Most religions are incompatible with feminism since they tend to preach that women are a second class that can't hold leadership positions.

She absolutely has the right to choose what she wants to wear. She choose poorly is all. It's like showing up to a wedding as a guest and wearing a bridal gown. You don't do it.

What I'm actually saying is that wearing a garment that has been used to terrorize and oppress thousands of women is incompatible with feminism.

Except it's not. The freedom of individuality means you actually don't have to give a fuck about the symbolism.

Does this apply to a white guy in blackface too? Or a redneck dressed in klan robes?

You might get the shit beat out of you, but that's your choice.

Which is EXACTLY MY POINT. It was her choice to wear a hijab - and it was a bad choice. Fuckin' hell man.

Oh come on that was not your point, your point was that the hijab is incompatible with feminism, which is wrong.

Let me say it slowly.

She has the bloody fucking right to wear a hijab if she wants to. And it is incompatible with feminism.

Both statements can be true. And both statements are true. There are women being arrested right now for not wearing the hijab. Women are being killed for not wearing a hijab. I know those are extreme cases and "not all Muslims" but they're not RARE cases and they are state supported.

Knowing that - you think wearing a hijab is perfectly aligned with feminist ideology of equality of the sexes?

If she was a man and wore a hijab would that be a problem?

"Oh you got me - if she were a man I'd think it's okay" - is that how my reply went in your head?

All else being equal - yes of course.

If a man wore a Klan or Nazi uniform I would take issue with it as well. Women can do thing that are anti-feminist. Phyllis Schlafly spoke out against 'marital rape' ffs.

"Being a woman" does not isolate you from criticism. Nor should it be the source of criticism. Supporting a religion that even in moderate mosques doesn't allow men and women to worship together and wearing an article of clothing that is literally forced on women in some regions seems antithetical to the belief that women should have equality with men.

Muslim men must cover up down to the knee and are not allowed to shave their beards. There's "rules" for both sides. In that this is what they should do if they feel called to do so.

It isn't "telling a woman what to wear" to call out it is logically inconsistent to champion the independence and equality of women, and also wear a sign of patriarchal theistic oppression.

The Qur'an doesn't tell women to wear a hijab. It's up to the woman to decide whether she feels called upon to wear it. Plenty of Muslim women don't wear one and governments and men who force women to wear one are assholes.

PS feminism is about choice.

It isn't "telling a woman what to wear" to call out it is logically inconsistent to champion the independence and equality of women, and also wear a sign of patriarchal theistic oppression.

You have to speak over a lot of women to call a hijab a symbol of opression since there are millions of them that wear it of their own will, in places it's not required, and will gladly tell you that it's part of their culture and not representative of a radical minority. What you doing is akin to saying anyone who wears a crucifix necklace supports priests abusing kids.

Hundreds of million more women are forced to wear it…

Why people defend something as disgusting and abhorrent as religion I’ll never know.

Where do you think most Muslim women live? Because the answer is the asian pacific region. You just think the entire religion is the Middle East and North Africa because that's all you've been shown. As long as you've been alive those two regions have never been the majority of Muslims.

In Indonesia is where I think most live, because I’m Australian and I know the worlds largest Muslim population and 4th most populous country in the world is Indonesia. I’m also well aware of its influence on other neighbouring countries.

So yeah, make up some more strawmen.

Don't care, all abrahamic religion is trash. Symbols of that "brand" come with all available baggage.

It is logically inconsistent to care about freedom, equality, etc and subscribe or put any stock in organizations that work to the very opposite of the spectrum.

1 more...

That is not how the majority of Muslim women who wear hijab of their free will see it. Often it is framed in you hide what is most important to you. For Muslim women who have to wear hijab and do not want to it is seen as a tool of oppression. The difference is choice.

We are past second-wave feminism for the most part. If you can choose what you want to do, it is OK to choose traditionally feminine things. I am not Muslim. But I love kids, cooking and cleaning. It is OK. I can be more than one thing.

The majority of Muslim women live in countries where they are forced to wear it.

Stop acting like it’s a choice for so many just because a few privileged westerners get a choice.

the majority of muslim women live in southeast asia, try again.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/07/21/indonesian-women-speak-out-dress-codes

Such restrictive local regulations have appeared and spread rapidly over the last two decades, compelling millions of girls and women in Indonesia to start wearing the jilbab, or hijab […] Human Rights Watch interviewed more than 100 women who have experienced abuse and often long-term consequences for refusing to wear the jilbab. […] The 2021 report documented widespread bullying of girls and women to force them to wear the jilbab, as well as the deep psychological distress the bullying can cause. In at least 24 of the country’s 34 provinces, girls who did not comply were forced to leave school or withdrew under pressure, while some female civil servants, including teachers, doctors, school principals, and university lecturers, lost their jobs or felt compelled to resign.

Try again.

Hijab is not compulsory in majority of the Muslim countries legally to wear hijab. Socially it is in many, many more. But enclaves of choice among this is to purely Western perpgative. Choice is part of decision commonly in places like North Africaq, Jordan and Turkey.

To be clear: people can wear whatever they want Their life. Outside of a discussion like this, I don't care.

Second, I don't have a specific axe to grind with Islam. Only organized religion that doesn't put equality in everything as their first tenet.

Regarding this person, and this conversation, my point is that to put yourself out there as a champion of equality and freedom, then wear the uniform of oppression (any artifact of a patriarchal, power abusing, non equality based religion is such a uniform) is inconsistent.

You can't just start wearing a swastika in the nazi motif and claim you just wear it for yourself, and you have your own personal narrative with it, that it empowers you. It doesn't matter if millions of people do it, or wear a headscarf, hijab, etc. Even if every one of them claims they like it, and do it only for themselves, they got that idea from a poison well.

The swastika is still used in Hindu spiritualism because thats the origin of the symbol. No one bats an eye at Hindu temples that literally have that symbol carved into them, because that was it's original purpose. Now what changes about that situation when its a woman wearing a hijab instead of a temple or other holy things with a swastika. Spain and Italy still celebrate religious events that use uniforms that look like the KKK uniform becaus its the garment that the KKK based their uniform off but because that wasn't their original purpose, no one tries to stop them, and I'd wager you've never expressed any disconcern with either of those, but when it's a women who chooses something for himself now suddenly you have an opinion.

I said in the nazi motif. This has nothing to do with women. Fuck off with that bait.

Wearing crosses is the same, male or female.

I didn't know about that Spanish shit, haven't heard of it so not sure how I'd be ready to comment. Do they claim to be progressive egalitarians?

Wear any garb of an abusive religion and you are no longer making sense if you "care" about equality.

So swastikas not in the nazi motif are okay but Hijabs not in the compulsory motif arent okay? You clearly know the swastika was originally a hindu symbol and made exceptions in your arguement for it, why is it different when a woman chooses a garment not in a hateful motif?

Nothing about thay comment was bait. Hijabs Swastikas and that uniform are all religious items that were co-opted by hateful people. You're just lashing out because you can't explain your inconsistency on it, and why you only speak up when its a women choosing something.

Any symbol of any abrahamic religion is a symbol of repression, patriarchy, and abuse of power. ANY.

Cross, hijab, yamaka, anything.

All those religions use unbalanced power dynamics to oppress people.

It's fine to like that (I guess) because it's your life. Like and wear whatever you want.

But it is hypocritical to advocate for freedom and equality and wear the logo of an oppressor. Doesn't matter if you are a woman, man, Christian or Muslim, whatever.

I made the connection to the nazi-swastika (read, not the Hindu one) because it's an obvious example of the same concept. Would you trust someone standing up and advocating for Jewish rights while wearing a full SS uniform?

I am saying symbols of abrahamic religions are the same thing.

Lastly, I'm not "speaking out", I'm discussing on a chat forum. And I'm discussing a woman's choices because the thread is about hijabs and this artist of very pointedly spent part of her life calling our religious corruption. If this had been about someone else, in another thread, obviously I would contextually refer to them and their situation. The "bait" call-out is you are trying to paint me as misogynistic because I'm discussing a woman in a thread about a woman. Bullshit. You even claim to be aware of my whole discussion history through life, as if you're aware of my backlog of thoughts and opinions.

To be clear: people can wear whatever they want Their life. Outside of a discussion like this, I don't care.

Second, I don't have a specific axe to grind with Islam. Only organized religion that doesn't put equality in everything as their first tenet.

Regarding this person, and this conversation, my point is that to put yourself out there as a champion of equality and freedom, then wear the uniform of oppression (any artifact of a patriarchal, power abusing, non equality based religion is such a uniform) is inconsistent.

You can't just start wearing a swastika in the nazi motif and claim you just wear it for yourself, and you have your own personal narrative with it, that it empowers you. It doesn't matter if millions of people do it, or wear a headscarf, hijab, etc. Even if every one of them claims they like it, and do it only for themselves, they got that idea from a poison well.

1 more...
1 more...