If they're advertising a price lock and not delivering a price lock how are they not being hit with the long arm of a government agency for false advertising?
Because fuck u that's why
The US government in a nutshell.
"Best we can do is approve another merger to allow them to grow bigger"
Why would they serve losers when they can serve better people!
It ain't rocket science... There is a club...
It is what we make of it.
Because both political parties have limited the power of said government to do so.
If they're advertising a price lock and not delivering a price lock how are they not being hit with the long arm of a government agency for false advertising?
Because fuck u that's why
The US government in a nutshell.
"Best we can do is approve another merger to allow them to grow bigger"
Why would they serve losers when they can serve better people!
It ain't rocket science... There is a club...
It is what we make of it.
Because both political parties have limited the power of said government to do so.
They are, just not for Internet... yet...
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/06/t-mobile-users-thought-they-had-a-lifetime-price-lock-guess-what-happened-next/
Fine print
Because they do not care about you
Asked? How about the government tells them with a big fine.
T-Mobile are secretly douchebags?
NO! really?
Is that.....Suits?!
Yeah, they've been using them in the T-Mobile ads.
https://youtu.be/aVc40M3EU4I
As someone who considered Suits somewhat of a guilty pleasure, that ad is absolute mirthless garbage lol. The top comment on the video is spot on.
I didn't even know what Suits was, somebody had to tell me.
They look so old, it's like seeing someone you haven't seen since high school and they just look old and run down.
One grifter calling the other grifter out. Interesting times we live in.