Supreme Court, for Now, Keeps Block on Revamped Biden Student Debt Plan

theprogressivist @lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 92 points –
Supreme Court, for Now, Keeps Block on Revamped Biden Student Debt Plan
nytimes.com

The Supreme Court on Wednesday maintained a temporary pause on a new effort by President Biden to wipe out tens and perhaps hundreds of billions of dollars of student debt.

The plan was part of the president’s piecemeal approach to forgiving debt after the Supreme Court rejected a more ambitious proposal last year that would have canceled more than $400 billion in loans. Mr. Biden has instead pursued more limited measures directed at certain types of borrowers, including people on disability and public service workers, and refined existing programs.

The decision leaves in limbo millions of borrowers enrolled in a new plan, called Saving on a Valuable Education, which ties monthly payments to household size and earnings.

The emergency application was one of two related to the program that the justices decided on Wednesday. The brief order did not give reasons, which is typical, and no public dissents were noted.

Republican-led states had filed a number of challenges to the plan, including a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, in St. Louis, which earlier this summer issued a broad hold on the loan plan while it considers the merits of the case.

21

Just declare loan forgiveness as an official act, then claim immunity

Then walk out going:

"Fuck you" points at Thomas

"Fuck you" points at Alito

"Fuck you" points at Gorsuch

"Fuck you" points at Kavanaugh

"Fuck you" points at Roberts

"Fuck you" points at Barrett

"You're cool" *points at Sotomayor, Jackson, and Kagan.

"I'm out, bitches!"

This is exactly what I hoped Biden's admin would do when they were challenged. "Oh no I made it an Executive Order anyway, it's happening so deal with it".

We need to flip the house and pass the senate’s bill to expand the court. Screw these extremists.

13 federal circuits.

There should be 13 Supreme Court justices.

Each justice could be responsible as “executive” of their circuit.

12 associate justices for the 1st through 12th circuit.

The chief justice is assigned the Federal Appeals Circuit.

It makes way too much sense.

Your statement is the extremist view.

Just using the legislative process to do what has been done before.

It's kind of weird to think using the legislative process as the founders did is extreme.

And in four years just expand the court. And in four years just expand the court. What is your end game

Until we come up with a way to uncorrupt the courts, sure. Currently, the SCOTUS is illegitimate.

I reiterate: It's kind of weird to think using the legislative process as the founders did is extreme. Why do I say that? Because the founders organized the Supreme Court via legislation.

If in four years a Republican-controlled House, Senate, and Executive branch want to expand the court via legislation, then that's their prerogative. And if four years after that, a Democrat-controlled House, Senate, and Executive branch want to do it again, that's fine.

There's nothing magical or mystical about nine members. Other developed countries have much larger Supreme Courts, which dilutes the ability of any one administration to shape it.

You can’t change the number of justices on the Supreme Court.

Except that you can.

And they did. Eight times.

1789 - six justices

1801 - reduced to five justices

1802 - restored to six justices

1807 - seven justices

1836 - nine justices

1863 - ten justices

1866 - nine justices

1867 - eight justices

1869 - nine justices

::: spoiler New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
:::

::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/28/us/politics/supreme-court-biden-student-loans.html?unlocked\_article\_code=1.GU4.wjb1.jPysVLr40Rwx&smid=re-nytimes ::: Media Bias Fact Check | bot support