SpeechlessThe Picard Maneuver@startrek.websitemod to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 719 points – 12 months ago16Post a CommentPreviewHotTopNewOldBy the Nine this is so compressed that the MsPaint blue rectangle has artifacts.Needs more jpeg This enough?That’s not really JPEG, that’s more like lower resolution and increased blur That's the kinda crispyness I need!I ran it through ffmpeg with the jpeg quality attribute set to like 10 lolhttps://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAMHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.Yeah, why does it have that? I thought things are more compressible if they're simpler (no artifacts, just a flat blue rectangle).all depends on the compression algorithm. jpeg is not great at that sort of computer interface type lookYep. Just like in a meeting when someone asks "John, do you have anything to add?" "No, but ... <10 minutes of additions>"I believe the word they were looking for is flabbergasted.he can still write thoughwas undoubtedly the most bnah, that's writing.its actually text
By the Nine this is so compressed that the MsPaint blue rectangle has artifacts.Needs more jpeg This enough?That’s not really JPEG, that’s more like lower resolution and increased blur That's the kinda crispyness I need!I ran it through ffmpeg with the jpeg quality attribute set to like 10 lolhttps://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAMHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.Yeah, why does it have that? I thought things are more compressible if they're simpler (no artifacts, just a flat blue rectangle).all depends on the compression algorithm. jpeg is not great at that sort of computer interface type look
Needs more jpeg This enough?That’s not really JPEG, that’s more like lower resolution and increased blur That's the kinda crispyness I need!I ran it through ffmpeg with the jpeg quality attribute set to like 10 lolhttps://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAMHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
This enough?That’s not really JPEG, that’s more like lower resolution and increased blur That's the kinda crispyness I need!I ran it through ffmpeg with the jpeg quality attribute set to like 10 lolhttps://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAMHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
That’s not really JPEG, that’s more like lower resolution and increased blur That's the kinda crispyness I need!I ran it through ffmpeg with the jpeg quality attribute set to like 10 lolhttps://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAMHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
I ran it through ffmpeg with the jpeg quality attribute set to like 10 lolhttps://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAMHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
https://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAMHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Yeah, why does it have that? I thought things are more compressible if they're simpler (no artifacts, just a flat blue rectangle).all depends on the compression algorithm. jpeg is not great at that sort of computer interface type look
all depends on the compression algorithm. jpeg is not great at that sort of computer interface type look
Yep. Just like in a meeting when someone asks "John, do you have anything to add?" "No, but ... <10 minutes of additions>"
By the Nine this is so compressed that the MsPaint blue rectangle has artifacts.
Needs more jpeg
This enough?
That’s not really JPEG, that’s more like lower resolution and increased blur
That's the kinda crispyness I need!
I ran it through ffmpeg with the jpeg quality attribute set to like 10 lol
https://youtu.be/9kaIXkImCAM
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/9kaIXkImCAM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Yeah, why does it have that? I thought things are more compressible if they're simpler (no artifacts, just a flat blue rectangle).
all depends on the compression algorithm. jpeg is not great at that sort of computer interface type look
Yep. Just like in a meeting when someone asks "John, do you have anything to add?" "No, but ... <10 minutes of additions>"
I believe the word they were looking for is flabbergasted.
he can still write though
was undoubtedly the most b
nah, that's writing.
its actually text