because invading another country usually involves mass civilian deaths and should be avoided as a rule
Nobody wants to invade Russia. Whats absurd is that we sit around and let them invade other countries. I understand the desire to avoid escalation but if all other avenues fail there should be a willingness among free nations to boot them out swiftly and efficiently and make it clear that their dreams of empire building are done and it's time to get their house in order instead of distracting themselves with destroying others.
there is currently an extensive international effort to not let them invade other countries
Not really. :/
Sure, we give Ukraine weapons, but that's not really going to be enough to drive out Russia for good.
because invading another country usually involves mass civilian deaths and should be avoided as a rule
Nobody wants to invade Russia. Whats absurd is that we sit around and let them invade other countries. I understand the desire to avoid escalation but if all other avenues fail there should be a willingness among free nations to boot them out swiftly and efficiently and make it clear that their dreams of empire building are done and it's time to get their house in order instead of distracting themselves with destroying others.
there is currently an extensive international effort to not let them invade other countries
Not really. :/
Sure, we give Ukraine weapons, but that's not really going to be enough to drive out Russia for good.
Which is a nice change to their usual invasions of other countries.
Of course if that could happen if anyone were to invade other countries, it would be nice.
Yes but not nearly so committed that treating them more "sternly" immediately entails a full out invasion of Russia.
This is what NATO exists to do.
It's also gone hilariously bad for those who tried in the past
Russia is incoveniently large.