Why Bethesda Responding to Starfield's Steam Reviews Is Part of a Rising Games Industry TrendGoronmon@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.world – 121 points – 7 months agoign.com11Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsI think what bothers me the most about the developer responses was that they sounded like Chat GPT. Like you get past the first paragraph and you already know what the whole 4 more paragraphs is gonna say, just in a different way.That’s because marketing/pr people speak just like ChatGPT, just saying a bunch of nothing wasting the oxygen used to voice itkinda like chatGPT is trained on a bunch of PR speak.For me it reads as typical boilerplate text, that can be seen in responses from so many companies. Not really better then ChatGPT but at least there are humans involved in that mindless task.Pretty much has to be boilerplate tbh, as they can only fish out a response from the preapproved can.I would also guess that the reason they sound similar is that a lot of the training data of ChatGPT comes from that type of company texts.It may very well be Chat GPT, or another generative AI, tbh.
I think what bothers me the most about the developer responses was that they sounded like Chat GPT. Like you get past the first paragraph and you already know what the whole 4 more paragraphs is gonna say, just in a different way.That’s because marketing/pr people speak just like ChatGPT, just saying a bunch of nothing wasting the oxygen used to voice itkinda like chatGPT is trained on a bunch of PR speak.For me it reads as typical boilerplate text, that can be seen in responses from so many companies. Not really better then ChatGPT but at least there are humans involved in that mindless task.Pretty much has to be boilerplate tbh, as they can only fish out a response from the preapproved can.I would also guess that the reason they sound similar is that a lot of the training data of ChatGPT comes from that type of company texts.It may very well be Chat GPT, or another generative AI, tbh.
That’s because marketing/pr people speak just like ChatGPT, just saying a bunch of nothing wasting the oxygen used to voice itkinda like chatGPT is trained on a bunch of PR speak.
For me it reads as typical boilerplate text, that can be seen in responses from so many companies. Not really better then ChatGPT but at least there are humans involved in that mindless task.Pretty much has to be boilerplate tbh, as they can only fish out a response from the preapproved can.I would also guess that the reason they sound similar is that a lot of the training data of ChatGPT comes from that type of company texts.
Pretty much has to be boilerplate tbh, as they can only fish out a response from the preapproved can.
I would also guess that the reason they sound similar is that a lot of the training data of ChatGPT comes from that type of company texts.
I think what bothers me the most about the developer responses was that they sounded like Chat GPT.
Like you get past the first paragraph and you already know what the whole 4 more paragraphs is gonna say, just in a different way.
That’s because marketing/pr people speak just like ChatGPT, just saying a bunch of nothing wasting the oxygen used to voice it
kinda like chatGPT is trained on a bunch of PR speak.
For me it reads as typical boilerplate text, that can be seen in responses from so many companies.
Not really better then ChatGPT but at least there are humans involved in that mindless task.
Pretty much has to be boilerplate tbh, as they can only fish out a response from the preapproved can.
I would also guess that the reason they sound similar is that a lot of the training data of ChatGPT comes from that type of company texts.
It may very well be Chat GPT, or another generative AI, tbh.