Harris, endorsed by Biden, could become first woman, second Black person to be president

MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 551 points –
Harris, endorsed by Biden, could become first woman, second Black person to be president
apnews.com

She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term. 

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president. 

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

165

You are viewing a single comment

Its amazing how obsessed you guys are about race.

A lot of us feel really bad about how we treat non-white races...

Granted, a lot of us feel really good about it too...

Either way, it weighs on us.

Why dont you just treat everyone the same?

That's only been legally possible in the US in the last 60 years.

The scars are still visible.

Okay, but why dont we treat everyone the same?

As individuals many of us do. We baked a lot of racism and bigotry into laws and government agencies, and it still has an effect, and has not been thoroughly scrubbed. This is what folks are talking about when they discuss systemic racism.

There is systemic race issues but now it has flopped the other way. People that are white are being intentionally not hired due to their race. How is this any better?

I would understand if you guys advocated for people being preferentially hired due to coming from a hard home, but now its just based on race or other factors that dont define how hard their life is.

There is systemic race issues but now it has flopped the other way. People that are white are being intentionally not hired due to their race.

Oh this old chestnut. If you are either this uninformed or this disingenuous, it's not going to be enjoyable for either of us to continue this discussion. Someone else can do that work with you.

So if you looked at the top 100 companies, how many white people do they hire now? They are directly not hiring white people, this is just a fact, if you dont like it then maybe you shouldnt be advocting for crazy policies based on what people look like.

Where did you find an overview of the racial makeup of the top 100 companies' employees?

Bloomberg did not me and its in 2021 the S&P 100 hired about 300k people, and 94% of them were POC.

So it looks like you’re talking about this

While it does make that claim, you might also note phrases like:

That still leaves most companies in our dataset lopsided, with White people holding a disproportionate share of high-paying jobs at S&P 100 companies

Many laid off in the pandemic’s early days were people of color, who were rehired when demand bounced back.

Retirements also surged that year, and older workers are more likely to be White.

Note also they define “people of color” as “black, Asian, Hispanic, or other”

So the article that makes that claim basically says non-whites had been laid off and were re-hired. Pre-dominantly white people were able to retire early, and people of color are still way underrepresented in positions of authority

12 more...
12 more...
12 more...

Unsubstantiated assertion of fact, submitted in argument with a position I didn't take, as expected. Like I said, maybe someone else wants to have a tiresome conversation about basic reality with you that will end with you strutting around like you've won something no matter how it actually unfolds, but I'm not that guy.

If you wanted the data, sure I just had to do a quick google to remember the actual numbers. So in 2021 the the S&P 100 hired about 300k people, and 94% of them were POC. I get that its uncomfortable to see that sort of things happening, but those poor white that had a hard life have a much harder time getting a job because of their skin color.

12 more...
12 more...
12 more...
12 more...
12 more...
12 more...

Trying to, but every time we do the right loses their damned minds.

I love how people like you take "It's about damned time we have a woman (or black, circa 2008) president after centuries of not treating them equally" and somehow interpret that as "We're trying to keep the white male down".

The right is not losing their minds over Kamala, most of them probably hope she wins the primary because she is a weak candidate. You guys are creating this who race thing out of a couple random crazy people on the internet.

Well according to you, the right wing already does this.

The right is a big varying group and some are good and some are bad. I think their policy is to treat everyone the same, whereas the lefts policy is to pretend to treat minority groups better.

The American mind cant comprehend that sentence.

I think its actually the left is the only group that has an issue with this.

Here it is folks. The left is the only group that has an issue with treating everyone the same. That means that the right has no issues on that front according to this lemmy.ml user.

I would suggest blocking them completely as I have done. Their misdirection was fairly well done until the comment above so it's best not to let them trap you in the future.

Then why have you not blocked me? If I said I was a black woman would it be racist and sexist to block me?

12 more...
12 more...

This guy is a Trump supporter very thinly veiled as a leftist. Just thought folks on here might want to know. Scroll down just a bit and you'll see the comment where they think that only Democrats are racist and the right treats everyone the same.

Leftists are absolute losers, I am not a leftist, and I am not a trump supporter, but I would vote for him over Kamala. Try again.

12 more...