IANAL, but Ineffective Assistance of Counsel is well known to be extremely difficult to pull off, and even more so in civil cases. And, as I understand it, Trump’s sole basis for asserting it would be that the paperwork to receive a jury trial wasn’t filed properly, which resulted in a bench trial. Given that the judge otherwise provided acceptable due process to Mr. Trump, and the case appears to have been decided on clearly established facts and relevant law, I find it hard to believe that an appeal would work here.
Flipping to a different angle: Lawyers constantly fuck up paperwork; if the system allowed paperwork goofs to trigger new trials, it would bog courts down and provide an attack vector for attorneys to take advantage of.
Alex Jones’ lawyer sent his entire phone’s data to the opposing counsel, and he didn’t get a new trial. Now if that’s not a bad lawyer, I don’t know what is.
I doubt trump will get a new trial. I’m not even sure there’s a decent lawyer left in the country that would work that idiot.
Alex Jones’ lawyer
Was that the same one he had when he said the reason he didn't know his own children's ages in a custody hearing was that he ate some chili the night before and it was spicy?
Because no matter how crazy legal cases have gotten, I don't think I'll ever forget that gem
Look up the Twinkie Defense, when you have a moment.
I was thinking them being morons and being fined because they kept using same defense even after judge said to stop.
Oh, I feel pretty confident that any lawyer would say there is less than zero chance of that forming the basis of an IAC claim.
Good I hope they turn Trump Hotel into a homeless shelter.
Also NAL, but iirc part of that claim is that the trial would have gone differently otherwise. And I think we all know there was never any chance of that, except maybe not getting sanctioned.
IANAL, but Ineffective Assistance of Counsel is well known to be extremely difficult to pull off, and even more so in civil cases. And, as I understand it, Trump’s sole basis for asserting it would be that the paperwork to receive a jury trial wasn’t filed properly, which resulted in a bench trial. Given that the judge otherwise provided acceptable due process to Mr. Trump, and the case appears to have been decided on clearly established facts and relevant law, I find it hard to believe that an appeal would work here.
Flipping to a different angle: Lawyers constantly fuck up paperwork; if the system allowed paperwork goofs to trigger new trials, it would bog courts down and provide an attack vector for attorneys to take advantage of.
Alex Jones’ lawyer sent his entire phone’s data to the opposing counsel, and he didn’t get a new trial. Now if that’s not a bad lawyer, I don’t know what is.
I doubt trump will get a new trial. I’m not even sure there’s a decent lawyer left in the country that would work that idiot.
Was that the same one he had when he said the reason he didn't know his own children's ages in a custody hearing was that he ate some chili the night before and it was spicy?
Because no matter how crazy legal cases have gotten, I don't think I'll ever forget that gem
Look up the Twinkie Defense, when you have a moment.
Alex Jones still hasnt paid a dime of the 1.5 billion he owes either.. he never will and I doubt trump ever will pay any of these settlements either.
I was thinking them being morons and being fined because they kept using same defense even after judge said to stop.
Oh, I feel pretty confident that any lawyer would say there is less than zero chance of that forming the basis of an IAC claim.
Good I hope they turn Trump Hotel into a homeless shelter.
Also NAL, but iirc part of that claim is that the trial would have gone differently otherwise. And I think we all know there was never any chance of that, except maybe not getting sanctioned.