Threads (Not That Threads) Tells Meta It Had the Name First

vowseh@lemmy.eco.br to Technology@lemmy.world – 322 points –
Threads (Not That Threads) Tells Meta It Had the Name First
gizmodo.com

Meta has 30 days to stop using the name

29

You are viewing a single comment

Same name, same industry - digital messaging.

If Meta didn’t have a massive amount of money and lawyers, this would be a VERY easy case to win.

Meta decided they wanted the name, tried to buy it, and then opted to knowingly rip it out of a smaller company’s hands. What a bunch of assholes.

Why was he hell bent on using the name Threads. Every time I hear it makes me think of the Dragon Riders or Pern. Not messaging app. Fuck Meta hope the real Threads company wins.

I agree with the last sentence but Threads seems like a completely appropriate name for the service. Online conversations have been called threads for decades

social media platform called posts when

Right but it could've had a nonsense name, like Troods.

That just makes it too generic to trademark then. Imagine an automaker called "Cars".

Or a social media platform called "X."

The name just reminds me of the film. So I just assume that like the film the site is nightmare fuel and avoid it.

"Drummer, beat, and piper, blow,
Harper, strike, and soldier, go.
Free the flame and sear the grasses
Till the dawning Red Star passes."

It makes me think of the apocalyptic nuclear war drama. Quite appropriate.

To be fair, apps like that do tend to encourage people to isolate themselves at home, rather than going to meet people outside.

What a bunch of assholes.

Yeah, it's really surprising that an ethical, upstanding company like Meta would pull a dick move like that. It's so out of character.

an ethical, upstanding company like Meta

the hardest I've laughed this week 🥲

It seems like money shouldn't be able to buy a win in court for something so obvious, but here we are.

1 more...