Browser maker love-in snubs Google-shunned JPEG XL
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/e691c5c3-5306-4024-900a-94a63d7bf8b6.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![Browser maker love-in snubs Google-shunned JPEG XL](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f889e02e-31f5-45fa-a25e-1cb261a191ef.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
theregister.com
- Browser makers Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla have announced Interop 2024, a project to promote web browser interoperability.
- JPEG XL, a potential replacement for JPEG and PNG image formats, was not included in Interop 2024.
- The rejection of JPEG XL has been blamed on Google, with the Google Chrome team deciding not to support the image compression technology.
Archive link: https://archive.ph/nulY6
You are viewing a single comment
Am I having a stroke, or is this headline horrendously written?
I read it four times and I still don't understand what love-in means.
Dumb way of saying orgy.
I still don't understand. WTF are we talking about. This is tech news, not a celeb scandal. Why can't we just use simple words !
Why say lot word when few word do trick?
What's the smart way?
Orgy.
Horrible headline.
Chromium (used by most browsers)
doesn't support
JPEG XL (because Google doesn't like it)
It was chrome and Firefox both who were against the format, both saying too expensive to implement for too small a benefit
Something about love in subs for Google ? And also JPEG?
The register is doing this shit for years. They are trying to sound smart...
I think these days that's the rule, if it piques your interest but you have some trouble understanding headline, you may just click on the article