US lawmakers vote 50-0 to force sale of TikTok despite angry calls from users

ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.world – 600 points –
US lawmakers vote 50-0 to force sale of TikTok despite angry calls from users
arstechnica.com
317

You are viewing a single comment

Sooo... How do Republican's square being the party of "Small Govt" and then interfering in a private business?

Is it a private business if it's owned by the Chinese government?

It's really not though? The Chinese government has a 1% stake in ByteDance. Meanwhile ~60% is foreign investors – believed to be mostly American.

You have a misunderstanding of how China's government operates. It does not matter how much stake the government holds, companies just cannot say no to the government's request. Otherwise you will be disappeared. See Alibaba for example.

Remember, China does not have a democracy.

That's literally the same thing the us government is doing here....

Ooooof, somebody licking the boot of capitalism a little too hard.

Then it should be easy to buy out that 1% stake.

I'm not saying it's a good bill, but reducing interference by foreign governments in US sold products is not against any party's philosophies.

They don't. It's all bad faith to get what they want - control.

Government is bad except when it comes to brutal subjugation of out-groups I don't like, while the in-group gets protected and treated with kid gloves by the same.

Unfortunately most of them are the dupes not the protected class they think they are - "they're hurting the wrong people" summed it up when it was uttered..

Too lazy to look up who said it, but there's a quote I like that goes something like "conservative seeks to have an in group who the law protects but does not bind, and an outgroup who the law binds but not protects"