Vanilla OS 2 Orchid - Stable Release

Philip Goto@feddit.nl to Linux@lemmy.ml – 157 points –
vanillaos.org
41

The day has come! I have been pretty excited for this release since Vanilla OS 2 was announced. I will have to try it out as soon as I can

Tbh it is a solid story about the os. I'm using silverblue but it made me curious.

They could benefit a lot using BTRFS instead of LVM Thin Provisioning, putting ext4 in LVM has worse performance than BTRFS

Uhm...is this recommended for a beginner to at?

It just had its first Stable release (as Vanilla OS 2). Therefore, consider to wait it out a bit until it has been well-tested at large. Until then, please feel free to choose something else that is to your liking. Like, what is it that attracted you to this one in the first place?

It would be largely fine, but be careful. Being immutable, a lot of things that you would expect will work differently or not at all. I would not recommend it, but if you're in for a challenge, it's not bad.

I'm still using windows 10 right now and playing with Linux Mint and Nobara every once in a while.

Based on that description, I will pass for the time being.

You could take a look at one of the universal blue distros next time you want to try some linux https://universal-blue.org/

I use bazzite on my gaming pc and bluefin on my laptop. It is immutable linux, but the devs made the defaults really nice (for me at least)

I can vouch for Bazzite. It's at the point where you don't really have to do any tinkering. The only thing I really had to configure some extra beyond the defaults was pipewire, allowing different sample rates for my USB audio DAC.

Things like what?

You have to spend a few seconds to actually learn how the apps install. By default you can only install flatpaks but they have containers to install apps from any distro too. You can't install apps natively unless you use one extra command.

Might this be the one for my father? He drowns in Windows, I don't want to think what Linux can do to his brain. I kept a Windows SSD to help him troubleshoot any problem he stumbled upon, but it died last week and all my attempts to install it on another SSD were met with the setup asking me for drivers, no matter what I tried to provide, I never got past that screen. So I don't know what to do, I guess I'll just wait and see, but I'm already eyeing some options.

I don't know how old your father is or what they do on their systems. However, for elderly people, for which I just want to setup the system and forget, I tend to go with Endless OS. It's more limited and more mature than Vanilla OS. But, if that's exactly what you want, I'm simply unaware of anything better out there.

Mmm looks very interesting, I will give this a try.

Still a shame it isn't based on the best distro in the world as it was initially planned.

EDIT: this was misinformation. Idk if I was hallucinating again or I confused it with another distro (e. g. BlendOS) but VanillaOS was never meant to be based on Arch.

I'm afraid basing their distro off TempleOS would be a bit too hard.

It was planned to be based on Arch btw fyi.

Very curious. I didn't know this. I tried verifying this, but didn't manage to do so.

So, I got to ask; Was this just a joke? Or is there (some) truth to this claim?

I would take a lot of time to find. Search in old TLE videos I guess. If he made news about it, there should be links to the sources too.

Thanks for the EDIT because I thought I had really missed something.

I am addicted to Arch and the AUR but it is precisely that it is NOT Arch that makes Vanilla look attractive. Do I REALLY need multiple new kernels per month like Arch gives me?

Having a more stable base sounds like a great idea. Using containers to get access to the Arch repositories and the AUR on top of Debian sounds even better. Vanilla bakes support for that scenario right in.

People really don't get jokes anymore

I got your joke ( it was not subtle ). I have absolutely no idea why that would prevent me from making my comment.