Beeper adds support for Google Messages RCS alongside iMessage, works on Android and iPhone

mastermind@lemm.ee to Android@lemdro.id – 183 points –
Beeper adds support for Google Messages RCS alongside iMessage, works on Android and iPhone
9to5google.com
44

So can I use this to join my family's group chat because they all have iphones and refuse to use anything but Imessage...

Yes, but they'll have to add you to the group chat using your Apple ID instead of your primary phone number unless you use one of the "workarounds" to get your number attached to iMessage.

https://airmessage.org/help/guide/phone-number

The workarounds listed are for Airmessage but they apply to Beeper as well in terms of getting your phone number attached. I've been using method #1 successfully for about a month now.

The way they got iMessage to work is by hiring a Foss developer who did something pretty amazing:

They reverse engineered the iMessage protocol and emulated parts of macOS that are necessary when registering an iMessage account on a device!!

https://github.com/beeper/pypush

Is Google's RCS open? Last I heard, it was still limited to Google Messages, but it's been a long time since I've paid attention.

Yeah good point actually... I'm still holding a little hope for RCS to finally be added to Textra someday so I can go back to that instead of Google Messages...

1 more...

Alas, until they open it up more, it's kinda useless for anyone that isn't already using it

No, it's very useful. They open-sourced the bridge, so you can easily add it to your own Matrix server: https://github.com/mautrix/gmessages/tree/main

What I mean is that there's a "waiting list" to use the app.

Trad means that if you aren't already using it, the new features aren't useful yet.

I could probably have just said "anyone scrolling, be aware that there's a wait to use the app" to be a bit more clear.

How do you mean? I'm actually kinda interested since I have friends on WhatsApp and Signal. Seems like it would make things more convenient by combining both messengers.

Is there a downside I'm missing?

Edit: they break E2E encryption for forwarding, so no dice :( https://www.beeper.com/faq#how-does-beeper-connect-to-encrypted-chat-networks-like-imessage-signal-whatsapp

I don't see any downside, especially since it is mostly open source, so you can make your own server if you want. You'll get Element and Synapse rather than Beeper's fork, but it works well.

There is that, but I meant that they are apparently weeks to months behind on their waiting list for new users. I've been on the list for a month now

1 more...

Anyone know what the beeper monetization model is? This is super cool, but I'm not sure how the company intends to monetize this, which always makes me a bit nervous

Does Beeper offer anything that Matrix bridges don't?

Ease of use. Manually setting up bridges for every messaging conversation you’re in is a pain.

Is there a Matrix Bridge for RCS? RCS is neither SMS nor is it Google Chat.

Edit: this isn't to claim Beeper is better. Just stating that technically there is something on offer that Matrix Bridges doesn't support. I think I'd still prefer Matrix with Bridges over Beeper.

Edit: apparently Beeper is based on Matrix. Can't confirm whether their own repo would introduce any dependencies for their bridge that isn't in the main repo for Matrix. So it's hard to say.

Yes. "Beeper adding support" is really them making a new Matrix bridge, and they open source all of their bridges, so just use theirs. It's here: https://github.com/mautrix/gmessages/tree/main

So that does change things, but doesn't necessarily confirm it would natively work with Matrix (though doesn't discount it either). Is there confirmation that mautrix bridges are cross-compatible to matrix? Technically Beeper is built off of mautrix which is based on Matrix but isn't necessarily the same as Matrix. I don't know much about Beeper as I only learned of it today.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought that Matrix was a protocol, while mautrix was a client framework for the Matrix protocol written in Golang. Mautrix bridges are bridges for Matrix based on the mautrix framework. Beeper uses the Matrix protocol with some bridges (and maybe other components) based on mautrix; it's basically a proprietary commercial fork of Synapse and Element with better-integrated bridges. I have several mautrix bridges on my Matrix server, and every mautrix bridge I see (including gmessages) says it's for Matrix.

I'm using 8 mautix bridges on my Matrix server: GMessages, Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, Discord, iMessage, Telegram, and Signal.

It works, I've been using the bridge linked for about a month no issues so far.

Beeper adds more polish, meaning that you don't need to manually configure bridges or maintain the Synapse server. It also gives you better indications of what bridge a room is from than Element does. If you know how to set up a Matrix server, you probably don't need it, but it's nice to have the option.

isn't that what Beeper uses?

SocialSmartly has changed the way I manage my social media conversations. It's a must-have tool for anyone looking to streamline their workflow.