One year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billion

ijeff@lemdro.id to Technology@lemmy.world – 1067 points –
One year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billion
arstechnica.com
184

You are viewing a single comment

I don't get that platform. I just signed up for mastodon and am not sure I'm feeling that either.

I feel like these Twitter-style sites are just ...like... Keyboard warriors. It's just smug post after smug post.

It honestly creeps me out. Like I see all these popular political posts by profile icons I recognize.... But every post is just whinging...

Who are these people and why do they get popularity and even mentioned on the news as truth when their posts have no sources and are just bullshit political emotion. Then you read a news article that "Twitter is cancelling....". All because there was one post about with someone acting like a dick.

In its ideal form, a microblog style site could literally provide an online version of a collective consciousness of society. It would be a live feed of normal people's thoughts.

Except in reality it's porn, smug posting, corporate advertising, vitriol, and propaganda all fueled by algorithms written to keep mofos scrolling.

It was good for two things: on the ground news, and speaking directly to businesses to resolve customer complaints.

Which Elon ruined since most businesses are abandoning it. But man at one time if you complain on twitter and tag the company in it your problem would fix pretty fast. Doubt that would work today.

Which is dumb you have to take your support request public before you get sny sort of help

speaking directly to businesses to resolve customer complaints.

It really pisses me off that companies respond to Twitter posts but will ignore tickets and emails in their own support system.

Yeah. I pretty much only used Twitter for live event updates.

You don't get advertising or algorithmic crap on Mastodon, and they have reasonably reliable filters to hide most porn I think

Would the collective consciousness actually be interesting to read?

Honestly the format is good for stuff like quick business headlines and rumors that you could use if you're trading (basically free "squawk", given that professional squawk services cost a lot). It's also good to quickly spread the word during protests or similar.

But I agree that all of that is still offset by the huge amount of smugness and "ratio" competitions.

Yeah that's a fair summary. It's brands doing announcements and ads, and people being assholes. Why would I be interested in either?

All depends on who you follow. If you follow people who make stuff (art, software, etc) then youโ€™ll find your feed a lot more upbeat.

Still, on another platform (such as Lemmy) they could make more meaningful posts.

I think the whole point is that it gives media companies something to pretend is โ€œnews,โ€ and everyone else something to be pretend-outraged over. Full stop.

I'm with you. Lots of randoms giving their opinions on something that other randoms can show their support for? Huh... alright, I guess.

1 more...