Joe Biden criticises snack makers for ‘shrinkflation rip-off’

pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.world – 259 points –
Joe Biden criticises snack makers for ‘shrinkflation rip-off’
theguardian.com
82

You are viewing a single comment

Law requiring all prices to be in a format of

$ per actual measurement unit and include all applicable taxes.

Presidents can't pass laws and the House Republican majority is basically dedicated to going against whatever Biden proposes.

Absolutely it's very frustrating watching them try to do so much only to have it curtailed by a Republican majority Congress.

People think the president can issue an executive order for anything they want. That being said I hope his cabinet does move on proposing this because it would be a huge win for pricing transparency.

Absolutely it’s very frustrating watching them try to do so much only to have it curtailed by a Republican majority Congress.

It was more frustrating two years ago when it was being curtailed by a Democratic majority congress.

Yeah well Dems stopping tax cuts for the rich don't hurt us as much as Reps trying to shut down the government because we refuse tax cuts for the rich but by all means "both sides"

Yeah well Dems stopping tax cuts for the rich don’t hurt us as much

Who said anything about them stopping tax cuts for the rich? I was talking about stuff Democrats did 2 years ago, like stopping the minimum wage increase and BBB. You know, their accomplishments.

How in the world can you contribute that to the Dems when they were split and Republicans almost unanimously voted against it.

If you're issue is that they should have all voted to push it through then absolutely I wish they would too and you should vote in a way that reinforces what you'd like to see.

That being said of our two options Dems support it the most. If your argument is that we should have more options to vote for what we really want then we agree again, we need voter reform to make 3rd options viable via multi-choice voting

How in the world can you contribute that to the Dems when they were split and Republicans almost unanimously voted against it.

BBB never made it to the floor, thanks to the only Democrat whose voice matters, Joe Manchin.

If you’re issue is that they should have all voted to push it through then absolutely I wish they would too

My issue is that the party is useless on purpose. Your issue is that I don't worship them for it.

I wish they would too and you should vote in a way that reinforces what you’d like to see.

There is no available way to vote that will ever reinforce what I'd like to see. Democrats oppose me less than Republicans do and that's the best they'll ever be willing to do.

Based insane take divorced from reality.

What in my reply made it seem like I worship them, they're the best we have and I long for better way but the only way we're going to get better is voteing reform on many levels.

Voting in fascists out of spite does no good.

And predictable as the dawn, there it is.

The assumption that anger at Democrats' deliberate uselessness means advocacy for voting for Republicans.

These people are just as blind as the fringe right conspiracist nutjobs. It's like they're arguing that McDonalds is better than Burger King because they only spit in your food 75% of the time rather than 95% of the time, while you're arguing that we shouldn't be eating at either of these restaurants to begin with. To top it all off they call you insane and a fascist for not agreeing with them.

This country is so fucked.

Centrist Democrats can't imagine that people who don't want any spit at all in their burgers actually exist.

But it does, due to the unfortunate way our voting system is structured until massive voting reform voting for anyone accept the big two is literally voting for the other. It sucks but unless we change it we have to live with that

What a convenient excuse to silence all criticism.

Nope, I'm very vocal about criticism and fixing it but the solution you suggest has already horribly backfired once but by all means shoot yourself in the foot again

6 more...
6 more...
6 more...
6 more...

the only people suggesting we should be voting in fascists are those who want trump or biden.

Equating those two absolutely smashes nuance. They aren't the same

Nobody said they are the same, but that doesn't mean they aren't both facists.

if I said they were both old men or politicians or obscenely wealthy, would you think I'm saying they are the same?

they can share traits without being the same.

Some Democrats want to be the same across as many issues as possible without being called the same.

6 more...
6 more...
6 more...
6 more...
6 more...

There never was a Democratic majority congress. West Virginia and Arizona both sent senators who had a D next to their name, but were really Rs.

Not only that, but you need a super majority in the senate to get anything real through, which means you need 60+ Democrats who ALL need to be on board, along with a majority of Democrats in the House, AND a Democrat president.

That hasn't happened since early Obama, and he squandered it by trying to pass bipartisan legislation with the Republicans, instead of just railroading the right things through.

There never was a Democratic majority congress.

50 plus a tiebreaker is a majority. You lied.

West Virginia and Arizona both sent senators who had a D next to their name, but were really Rs.

West Virginia and Arizona sent senators who represent party leadership to absolute perfection. They define the party.

Not only that, but you need a super majority in the senate to get anything real through, which means you need 60+ Democrats who ALL need to be on board, along with a majority of Democrats in the House, AND a Democrat president.

The filibuster can be done away with forever with a simple majority. Manchin's party never will.

That hasn’t happened since early Obama, and he squandered it by trying to pass bipartisan legislation with the Republicans

He got the bailouts passed. Democrats could have destroyed the relic of Jim Crow that is the filibuster to pass the public option. But they didn't wanna.

When was the last time Republicans held a majority like that and how is it that despite that majority, they still manage to pass all their vile legislation?

6 more...
6 more...

Presidents can't pass laws

Yeah, this thread is beyond frustrating. We need to prioritize teaching civics in high school because it could not be more obvious that a large number of people out there have no idea what they’re even talking about. It’s just ignorant rage.

The top comment in this comment section is so ignorant it should embarrass everyone using Lemmy.

I love how this argument only comes out when it's needed to defend Democratic inaction. Bring up Trump's campaign and see how quickly that idea flips.

Right, but he could get the ball rolling by getting someone in congress he knows to start a bill for the idea.

If Repub's shoot it down, then he's got more ammo in his ads

  1. How do you know that hasn't already happened? Bob Casey's office released a report on shrinkflation, and sent a letter to the GAO to identify transparency measures that the federal government can implement to help consumers recognize shrinkflation. Sounds like there's a lot already moving.

  2. Why is him getting out in front of the issue in the media not considered "ammo for his ads"? If all he needs is something to virtue signal about, then isn't that exactly what he's doing right now?

6 more...

We have that in the Netherlands; it’s very helpful. You usually see a price per kilo or a price per liter. Makes it really easy to just look at product X, Y and Z and see which one is actually more expensive, without having to do math in your head. That really should be the law everywhere.

Yeah, and in the UK I noticed that tax is included on the listed price as well. So again, no surprises for people when they check out, and don't need to do the math to account for the extra tax.

Same in the Netherlands. A shop legally must show a price that includes taxes. I’m always amazed that that’s not a thing in the US. Because you’re still forced to pay those taxes anyway, so why confuse things by not just showing the tax included price?

Here, what you see is what you pay.

$ per actual measurement unit

I've already seen this in essentially every supermarket ever, usually per ounce. Sure, you have to have some vague intuition about what that is relative to the product, but you can still make standardized comparisons across, say, different kinds of chips, very easily.

It'd be nice to include taxes, I agree.

Including taxes doesn't really matter for that measure.

The bigger issue is that they're unreliable. They're often not updated if there's a sale, for instance.

6 more...