Which communication protocol or open standard in software do you wish was more common or used more?

Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlmod to Linux@lemmy.ml – 257 points –

Whether you're really passionate about RPC, MQTT, Matrix or wayland, tell us more about the protocols or open standards you have strong opinions on!

350

You are viewing a single comment

IPv6

I mean, why the hell is IPv4 still a thing??

Because ipv6 is yucky

Yeah I'm anti IPv6 so I'm not going to ever use it personally. Ipv4 is enough for me

go ahead and use that on your home network, but if you work in IT and deploy it on public networks i'm going to kick you in the nuts

Because SecOps still thinks NAT is security, and NetOps is decidedly against carrying around that stupid tradition.

You can even Nat still if you want too lol

That said have you looked at securing ipv6 networks?It can be a lot of new paridgms that need to be secured.

Try to remember a handful of them

In the world of computers, why would remembering numbers be the stop for new technologies?

Do you remember anyone's public key? Certificate?

I don't even remember domain (most) names, just Google them or save them as bookmarks or something.

The reason IPv4 still exists is because ISPs benefit from its scarcity. Big ISPs already paid a lot of money to own IPv4 addresses, if they switched to IPv6 that investnywould be worthless.

Try selling static IPv6 addresses as they do now with IPv4. People would laugh at them and just get a free IPv6 address from an ISP that wants to get new users and doesn't charge for it.

The longer ISPs delay the adoption of IPv6, the longer they can milk IPv4 scarcity.

I don't even remember my old ICQ UIN. People usually do that.

So yes, bring in IPv6.

Which ISPs offer IPv6 for free?
Asking for a friend.

IPv6 addresses are practically endless, therefore their value is practically 0. ISPs justify charging extra for static IPv4 because IPv4 addresses do have a value.

If ISPs charge for static IPv6, then one of them could just give that service for free (while keeping the rest of the prices the same as their competitors). That would get them more customers while costing them nothing.

EDIT: I can't give you an example of an ISP that offers free static IPv6 because there are no ISPs in my country that offer IPv6.

Should be every single one that supports IPv6.

For that matter, you should be getting an entire /60 at a minimum. Probably more like /56.

damn if only we had a service that like, obfuscated and abstracted these hard to remember IPs that aren't very user friendly, and turned them into something more usable. That would be cool i think. Someone should make that.

Some kind of name system surely.

perhaps one that were to operate on like, a domain level, maybe.

gah, i'm just not too sure there's a good term for this though.

Shortening rules actually make IPv6 addresses easier to remember than IPv4. Just don't use auto configuration.

2 more...
4 more...