new preference war just dropped

gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@programming.dev – 706 points –

geteilt von: https://lemmit.online/post/3018791

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ProgrammerHumor by /u/polytopelover on 2024-05-26 21:23:20+00:00.

97

You are viewing a single comment

First one are method name, second one are status name.


def open_file_dialog(self):
       self.dialog_file_open = True
       pass

Yoda level preference war.

I tend to add is to booleans toreally differentiate between a method name and a status.

def open_file_dialog(self):
    self.dialog_file_is_open = True
    pass

That way, it's easier for my dumb brain to spot which is which at a glance.

is_dialog_file_open

fite me

No fiting. IS always goes at the start of names for booleans you are correct

that works for 2 word names eg is_open or is_file, but in this case is_dialog_file_open is structured like a question, while dialog_file_is_open is structured like a statement

Doesn't matter, the point is that, if it starts with "is" then you automatically know it's a boolean.

It still works. is_this_thing_some_thingy. Is is just a prefix for if the suffix returns true/false.

In Elixir, we mark statuses by using a question mark at the end of the variable name. Something like this:

authorized? = user |> get_something() |> ensure_authorized?()

I like this better than the is_ prefix

does '?' have type definition in elixir or this is generally agreed design pattern?

If it's like Lisp, then ? is just part of the symbol and doesn't have any special syntatic meaning. In different Lisps it's also convention to end predicate names with a ? or with P (p for predicate)

jealously weeps in ruby

We do this in Ruby all the time, we just prefer methods over variables, usually.

def authorized?
  current_user&.authorized?
end

I'm a principal backend engineer routinely writing Ruby for my day job, so I'm familiar, lol. But you can't do it for local variables and that just sucks. Definitely a +1 for Elixir.

This is the way.

Command statement = an action

Question statement = a status