What prevents Linux from being installed on mobile devices?

shadysus@lemmy.ca to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world – 65 points –

Android phones for example

42

You are viewing a single comment

I guess I'm going to be that guy today. Android is Linux, and it's installed on a lot of mobile devices already.

Another aspect to this is that Android is Linux, but it is not GNU / Linux. This is true both in the literal sense of not using GNU coreutils or glibc, and also in the broader sense.

What I mean by the "broader" sense:

  • no X or Wayland
  • GTK or Qt support is something an application has to bring with them.
  • filesystem is substantially reorganized
  • users and system permissions setup substantially differently

To the application programmer Android / Linux looks like a completely different ball game.

What prevents Linux from being installed on mobile devices?

Android is Linux, but it is not GNU / Linux

You'll see that's not the question that was asked. And it's okay not to give Stallman any more validation for his fame-grab.

And you can (sometimes) install something like PostmarketOS which is closer to the kind of linux people think about when they hear "Linux"

Android is maintaining a fork of Linux kernel that has since diverged.

Its like saying MAC is UNIX, technically yes but not really

Its like saying MAC is UNIX, technically yes but not really

macOS is UNIX-based. Period. In fact, “[s]tarting with Leopard, macOS has been certified as compatible with the Single UNIX Specification version 3 (SUSv3).” Source

Exactly Android also is "Linux based" period.

That's my point.

Mac isn’t UNIX based, it is UNIX and comes with many of the UNIX tools a user would expect. Completely different situation.

macOS definitely is Unix. In the literal sense that it is actually certified (unlike FreeBSD, for example), and it is very much Unix-y under the hood.

As far as I can tell literally everything (except for windows) is UNIX, it isn’t exactly a high bar to pass, it’s like saying all drinks are water based which is technically true but I’m not going to give a kid a wine box when I run out of juice boxes.

I think that Linux is synonymous with open source and freedom and to some extent privacy.

android is synonymous with Google

I’m only guessing, but when people ask about a Linux tablet or phone, they actually want the former, rather than the later, even though android is a Linux derivative, as you rightly said.

I don’t know if you are deliberately missing the point ?

You need a lot more than open source android to make a phone work.

I didn’t miss the point. Maybe you’re conflating a distribution with an operating system. But, since you brought it up:

  1. LineageOS
  2. GrapheneOS
  3. Fire OS
  4. Many more…

My point is that — at least in my eyes — open source is not synonymous with one single project. Do with that what you will.

Edge cases

How many phones support grapheme ?

I really shouldn’t feed the trolls, but eh, I’m learning a lot rebuking you, so maybe somebody else can benefit from your ignorance as well:

GrapheneOS has official production support for the following devices:

  • Pixel 9 Pro Fold (comet)
  • Pixel 9 Pro XL (komodo)
  • Pixel 9 Pro (caiman)
  • Pixel 9 (tokay)
  • Pixel 8a (akita)
  • Pixel 8 Pro (husky)
  • Pixel 8 (shiba)
  • Pixel Fold (felix)
  • Pixel Tablet (tangorpro)
  • Pixel 7a (lynx)
  • Pixel 7 Pro (cheetah)
  • Pixel 7 (panther)
  • Pixel 6a (bluejay)
  • Pixel 6 Pro (raven)
  • Pixel 6 (oriole) Source

😊

1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...