After 9 months, the New Orleans Police Department’s use of facial recognition has resulted in zero arrests and multiple false positives

ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 1367 points –
New Orleans police use of facial recognition nets zero arrests in nine months - Louisiana Illuminator
lailluminator.com
77

You are viewing a single comment

14 out of 15 requests were of black people. Facial recognition is notoriously bad with darker skin tones.

Racial Discrimination in Face Recognition Technology https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2020/racial-discrimination-in-face-recognition-technology/

Yeah, this same exact story keeps coming up for years now just with different names. Why anyone would think that both the ineffectiveness and racial bias in these systems either wouldn’t exist or will somehow go away eventually is beyond me. Just expensive and ineffective mass surveillance for the sake of it…

Who remembers the HP computer that was unable to identify black people? One of my favorite "oooph, that's not a good look" tech fails of all time. At least the people in that video were having a good laugh about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4DT3tQqgRM

Holy hell, that was 13 years ago.

More recently, there was also Google Photos mistaking a photo of a black couple as "gorillas", back in 2015.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-33347866

On a funnier note, there was also the AI tool turning a pixelated photo of Barack Obama into that of a white man.

https://www.theverge.com/21298762/face-depixelizer-ai-machine-learning-tool-pulse-stylegan-obama-bias

Minor correction.
15 out of 15 requests were of black people. 14 of those requests were black men and 1 was a black woman.

Yeah. Basicly anything with a lower contrast, with shadows and backgrounds. And because shadows are dark, they have a lower contrast with other dark things.

Discrimination is the wrong word. Technology has no morals or sense of justice. It is bias in the data that developers should have accounted for.

It's totally accurate though. It's like the definition of systemic racism really. Think about housing or financial policy that disproportionately fails for minorities. They aren't some Klan manifesto. Instead they just include banal qualifications and exemptions that end up at the same result.

This seems shortsighted. You are basically asking people to police their own biases. That's a tall ask for something no one can claim immunity from.

I am asking a group of scientists who should be very well-versed in statistics and weights, you know, one of the biggest components in a machine learning model, to account for how biased their data is when engineering their model.

It's really not a hard ask.

So in other words technology is just as biased as the people who designed it

Ask the people who create the data sets that machine learning models train on how they feel about racism and get back to us

It can be an imported bias/descrimination. I still think that words fair.

Do you have a more accurate word?

I already said it: bias. It's a common problem with LLMs and other machine learning models that model engineers need to watch out for.

You need to learn some critical race theory. Racist systems turn innocent intentions into racist actions. If a PhD student trains an AI model on only white people because the university only has white students, then that AI model is going to fail black people because black people were already failed by university admissions. Innocent intention plus racist system equals racist action.

5 more...