So tired of Adobe. They're part of the problem.

๐‘”๐‘Ž๐‘™๐‘Ž๐‘ฅ๐‘–@lemm.ee to Technology@beehaw.org – 780 points –

I held off on Windows 10 for as long as I could until Adobe, and therefore my job, required it. Now this nonsense. I hope this isn't the start of them joining on the web DRM bandwagon.

122

You are viewing a single comment

This is seriously deserving of an antitrust investigation. An open web is essential.

*Edit: referring to Chrome and its derivatives, not Adobe. Alphabet/Google has been begging for antitrust action for years.

Adobe has already proved they don't understand web technologies when creating Flash.

They didn't create Flash. They bought a company called Macromedia who had created Flash.

Proving they donโ€™t understand web technologies...

Flash was pretty significant in the web's journey to where it is today. For things like online video, it was the least pain in the ass way, in a time when the alternative was crapware plug-ins like RealPlayer, QuickTime, or Windows Media Player.

YouTube probably wouldn't have existed without Flash and FLV.

I remember when it was FutureSplash Animator, and my young mind was blown by the possibilities of animations in only a few kb.

Wow I've been in tech a long time, but only knew it from Macromedia. Crazy

What a ridiculous, tech-ideology-above-all-else take. Not to mention over a decade past being relevant.

Flash could do things other technology at the time could not. It served a purpose at the time, thus its huge level of popularity.

Many popular things are crappy. It is not an ideology, unless you consider the scientists who invented the WWW to be some freaks.

Flash wasn't really useful, because many people couldn't display these websites. It was the exact opposite of WWW. WWW enabled people to use hypertext and provided accessibility.

Adobe is requiring customers to choose one of three different competing browsers, none of which are owned by Adobe.

There's no antitrust issue here.

How would that be an antitrust issue?

Google forcing people to use its browser or pushing companies to develop exclusively for its browsers has broad antitrust implications, especially if they are using their ad clout to push wider adoption.

Itโ€™s far more likely that Adobe is just being lazy/cheap in not supporting a browser with a small market share.

It's because firefox wont support the drm protocol that chromium/webkit will be pushing

No itโ€™s not?

Many websites are only ever tested to work on Chrome because companies donโ€™t care about catering to the smaller userbases of the other browsers.

What does Google have to do with Adobe not supporting one specific browser not made by either company?