US supreme court strikes down affirmative action

fart@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.world – 99 points –
Live updates: Supreme Court decision on affirmative action
cnn.com
130

You are viewing a single comment

Asking prospective students for their skin color when they apply to your school should be unthinkable.

"I want to attend your school just like my grandfather" = This is fine

"I want to attend your school because my grandfather wasn't allowed to" = This is not

Think about that for a second.

Legacy admissions shouldn't be a thing either, imo. It should be 100% about merit.

Absolutely.

And until that's the case, there's a clear double standard that benefits white people.

A pure merit-based approach also overwhelming benefits white people though, because they have a lot more generational income to help their kids get ahead in life.

Hook me up with that generational wealth. The ATM doesn’t accept race as a condition for providing money.

12 more...
13 more...
13 more...

But asking them who their father is is fine?

If people gave a shit about fairness they'd care about legacy admission more than affirmative action.

No, that's not fine either and should also be outlawed due to a history of systemic racism giving some people an advantage over others.

It should be 100% merit based, plain and simple. It's the only fair way.

Funny how we addressed the tool that helped black kids first, rather than the one that hurt them.

Maybe it's because this is being pushed by bad people, that you seem to agree with under some fantasy of "100% merit based" reality.

Systemic biases exist, AA compensated for them banking AA is basically pretending this nation isn't racist AF.

11 more...

That's not how it's going to play out in reality, unfortunately. I truly wish it were.

2 more...
13 more...

Neither is ok. But only one likely violates the constitution. Congress could make legacy admissions illegal if they wanted to.

Congress could've made affirmative action illegal if they wanted to?

But only one side works as the majority's dog whistle.

Yes. Even noted red state California (/s) voted in a referendum to make the practice illegal.

I really appreciate this take, because it reminded me that I can always call my congressman (or at least their office) and voice my opinion to ears that might be able to do something about it.

25 more...

Honestly, asking anyone for race on any application for anything shouldn't be a thing. With the exception of medical things specific to race, it's completely unnecessary. Unless I'm missing something glaring, other than perpetuating systematic disenfranchisement.

While I agree that requiring people to reveal their ethnicity should be a no-no for anything other than medical, asking for people to volunteer this information makes sense.

In UK in many places giving ethnicity is optional and the results are used to monitor how different groups aka "races" are doing. This then can be used for research.

It's a way for the college admissions to combat the systemic racism already present in USA society. It treats a symptom of a larger issue. A college cannot help with all the disadvantages minority students face throughout thier primary education but they can account for that in admissions.

38 more...