Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net.

My Password Is 1234@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.world – 959 points –
mstdn.social

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

817

You are viewing a single comment

Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

Israel have been successfully pressuring meta to remove and shadow ban accounts sympathetic to Palestinians. The level of censorship is crazy.

OK, I'll bite. You got something more substantial than "I read it on the internet" to back that up? One reputable source on your accusation? Not sayin' you're lying/wrong, just asking for some verifiable proof.

Numerous actual popular accounts and news sources have been suspended. It was major news in the Arabic-speaking world in October. Meta even apologized for auto-translating Palestinian as “terrorist.”

Hate to say it but that's a fail on producing a reliable source.

Thanks, that's much better.

You know, you have access to search engines too. You don't need to be lazy and treat the rest of the Internet as your personal stenographer/research assistant.

Fucking HELL, despite how increasingly easy it is to find information, it cannot keep pace with just how utterly fucking lazy people are getting.

Fuck off. You were asked for reliable sources - a very reasonable request these days, and you replied with none. I was right to call you out on that.

Only if you tried searching first and didn't find anything. If it's on the first page of Google if you just try searching the claim, then other people shouldn't need to link it for you.

No, just no. If you want strangers to take what you say seriously then you should show the simplest respect by supporting your claims with the reason(s) you have them. Laziness is flapping your mouth off and expecting to not have to back it up.

1 more...
1 more...
1 more...

At the moment this is coming from secondary sources from within meta so there are no articles about it that I'm aware of. But Palestinians and activists constantly have their content removed, account reach limited, and comments removed (which has happened to me multiple times). People also have their accounts threatened and removed.

These actions are visible constantly, meta have been doing this since the start. For example, when you go to someone's stories at the top it might show 4 or 5 stories, but when you click through to their profile there'll be 20+.

Some people I follow don't even show up at the top anymore and I have to access their stories via their profile page or if I've messaged them recently.

After (as of this reply) eight hours, you have produced nothing more than anecdotal evidence if not outright invented. I must assume at this point you are spreading disinformation for whatever your goals may be to that end.

Thank you for wasting everybody's time.

Go look for yourself instead of being condescending.

Welcome to Lemmy!

It’s like Reddit with the provocative takes and hyperbole, but even more extreme somehow!

This place is hilarious.

Well a good friend of my girlfriend is from Gaza. He has been posting translations from his sister's account of what it is actually like living there right now. Then some AI artwork behind stories of "this place was bombed, my friends just were killed, etc..." and he got a big notification on Instagram that "his account has been restricted for violent hate speech" even though he didn't incite violence even one time. He just has posts with 2nd person stories of the situation there.

1 more...

And thus is the problem with charging tech oligopolies with being the arbiters of truth: sometimes they disagree with you, but whatever they believe is "the truth", because they make it so.

1 more...

If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

"make another account somewhere" isn't really what federation is about.

Indeed it is, they're not saying you have to make an account on that person's server, they're saying that you can make it on a different server, that's the point of federation you can join other servers that are connected to them. It's not to be fully open without any limitations, because if it were then content moderation would be impossible.

Services like Nostr have this problem, they are like the wild West where anything goes and you can't do anything about it. To some people that seems great but the fact of the matter is those services are filled with right-wing trolls and crypto scammers (likely plenty of other nasty stuff as well) because they cannot be moderated.

Mastodon, Kbin, the new Lemmy 0.19 release allow on a per user basis to block entire domains, so I don't see how this is a "you can't do anything about it" situation. Just let users decide.

Lemmy 0.19's instance blocking does not filter users, only communities, in addition it does not solve the problems of content polution because it does not limit interaction from blocked malicious users in any way, just hides them (it only really works under the assumption that they're not malicious users and the blocker is just throwing a fit). For these reasons it is not and cannot be seen as an a replacement to defederation.

Also as I already said users are 100% free to decide, they decide by choosing their instances. If you don't like it you're free to host your own or move to a more open protocol like Nostr. The idea of federation was built around the idea of communicating with certain instances and blocking others, not about users individually choosing the servers they connect with, Some servers do operate democratically but in the end the fediverse is designed around servers so servers have every right to choose.

Also I'd like to address the "defederation will kill the fediverse" claims I've seen floating around. It won't in fact it's a dedicated feature of activitypub and has been in use since forever, instances are able to block ones that go against their values either due to the way those instances are operated or the users they allow on them. This is how it's worked since the beginning and almost certainly how it will continue. Some users don't like this and believe that they should be able to access stuff no matter what, failing to realize that they do not own the server their account is hosted on, accessing content on other servers via activitypub requires the content be copied over to your home server, and if the admins don't want that they can block that server, you don't really have a say in it because it isn't your server. So either host your own where you do own it, or move to a more open protocol which exist for the purpose of user freedom and anti-censorship.

What do you think it's about? Because from my perspective changing instances is kind of the entire defining feature that separates it from commercial platforms.

Federation is about being able to communicate with other people even if they use a different platform.

I feel like that's exactly how it was billed to me, find somewhere that federates with who you want, and if that changes, you're free to move

The choice of email providers is not about which one can exchange mails with GMail.

Some of the time it is though. Like Gmail has a pretty large list of IPs it won't deliver email from. When self-hosting, it's something you really do have to worry about.

The reason most people don't worry about it is that most people only use a handful of free emails and organizations that provide email addresses for their users spend time worrying about it so users don't have to.

When self-hosting, it’s something you really do have to worry about.

So erecting artificial walls is not positive then. Good we're on the same page.

No. I definitely prefer email with good spam blocking. I'm not criticizing Google for blocking mail how they do. It's pretty necessary. Which is also something you learn fairly quickly if you try to self host.

Google isn't blocking, it's moving suspected spam into the spam folder and users have the option to whitelist any false positives.

Blocking Threads completely with only "then fuck off" to the users is not what interoperability is about.

No. Google will not deliver at all a lot of email. It doesn't even make it to your spam folder.

Please explain how federating with Threads is "supporting Meta" and not the opposite.

I’m not sure if federating will help meta so much as it will definitely (most probably) hurt the lemmy/mastodon network.

Here’s a similar case that happened before, with the XMPP protocol being coopted by google but eventually killing it in favor of their own proprietary solution:

https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

Big tech isn’t on our side, and we have to handle outside corporate influence with heavy skepticism.

XMPP still exists and doesn't have any fewer users than before Google adopted it.

1 more...