Non-binary

realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 1293 points –
205

You are viewing a single comment

There are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.

I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs

There are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}βŠ‚{πŸ‚}

Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order

I think you actually want {🐸}βˆͺ{🐘}βŠ‚{πŸ‚} because βˆͺ is union and ∩ is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn't contain any bulls. πŸ˜”

Aktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set πŸ€“

But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point

Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€

we are crab πŸ¦€

πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€πŸ¦€

Crabs and will eventually evolve into crab.

2 more...

Are these elephants in the room right now?

As a non-elephant in the room I feel overlooked

The elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the room

There are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants.

This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.

2 more...