Non-binaryrealitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 1293 points – 1 months ago205Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsThere are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.This comment needs way more approval120 is a lot.I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogsThere are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {πΈ}β©{π}β{π}Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in orderI think you actually want {πΈ}βͺ{π}β{π} because βͺ is union and β© is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn't contain any bulls. πAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set π€ But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this pointFrogness is a spectrumThatβs a very frogressive thing to say.Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs π¦π¦π¦π¦we are crab π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦Crabbbbb people craaaabbb peopleeeeCrabs and will eventually evolve into crab.Crabs and not yet crabs.2 more...Are these elephants in the room right now?As a non-elephant in the room I feel overlookedThe elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the roomYou gotta address the elephant in the room for it to existYou either are crabs or have crabsHoly crabThere are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants. This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.2 more...
There are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.This comment needs way more approval120 is a lot.I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogsThere are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {πΈ}β©{π}β{π}Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in orderI think you actually want {πΈ}βͺ{π}β{π} because βͺ is union and β© is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn't contain any bulls. πAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set π€ But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this pointFrogness is a spectrumThatβs a very frogressive thing to say.Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs π¦π¦π¦π¦we are crab π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦Crabbbbb people craaaabbb peopleeeeCrabs and will eventually evolve into crab.Crabs and not yet crabs.2 more...Are these elephants in the room right now?As a non-elephant in the room I feel overlookedThe elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the roomYou gotta address the elephant in the room for it to existYou either are crabs or have crabsHoly crabThere are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants. This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.2 more...
I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogsThere are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {πΈ}β©{π}β{π}Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in orderI think you actually want {πΈ}βͺ{π}β{π} because βͺ is union and β© is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn't contain any bulls. πAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set π€ But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this pointFrogness is a spectrumThatβs a very frogressive thing to say.Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs π¦π¦π¦π¦we are crab π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦Crabbbbb people craaaabbb peopleeeeCrabs and will eventually evolve into crab.Crabs and not yet crabs.2 more...
There are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {πΈ}β©{π}β{π}Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in orderI think you actually want {πΈ}βͺ{π}β{π} because βͺ is union and β© is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn't contain any bulls. πAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set π€ But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this pointFrogness is a spectrumThatβs a very frogressive thing to say.
I think you actually want {πΈ}βͺ{π}β{π} because βͺ is union and β© is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn't contain any bulls. πAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set π€ But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
Aktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set π€ But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs π¦π¦π¦π¦we are crab π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦Crabbbbb people craaaabbb peopleeeeCrabs and will eventually evolve into crab.
we are crab π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦
π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦
Are these elephants in the room right now?As a non-elephant in the room I feel overlookedThe elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the roomYou gotta address the elephant in the room for it to exist
The elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the roomYou gotta address the elephant in the room for it to exist
There are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants. This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.
There are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.
Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.
This comment needs way more approval
120 is a lot.
I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs
There are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {πΈ}β©{π}β{π}
Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order
I think you actually want {πΈ}βͺ{π}β{π} because βͺ is union and β© is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn't contain any bulls. π
Aktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set π€
But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
Frogness is a spectrum
Thatβs a very frogressive thing to say.
Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs π¦π¦π¦π¦
we are crab π¦
π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦
Crabbbbb people craaaabbb peopleeee
Crabs and will eventually evolve into crab.
Crabs and not yet crabs.
Are these elephants in the room right now?
As a non-elephant in the room I feel overlooked
The elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the room
You gotta address the elephant in the room for it to exist
You either are crabs or have crabs
Holy crab
There are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants.
This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.