Fascists gonna fash. Time to make an example out of these terrorists to dissuade the others.
Under Georgia law, the names of grand jurors are included on indictments – a practice aimed at promoting transparency. However, this approach has come under scrutiny given the continuing threats following the recent indictment of Trump and 18 co-defendants.
Brave jurors.
They're conscripts. Nobody asked them whether they'd like to die.
I guess we just need to keep putting these seditionist assholes in prison.
I'm glad my country keeps juror identity strictly confidential. The lawyers involved and even the judge do not know the names or anything else about the jurors in a given case.
That is done with the specific intention of preventing jury intimidation from criminals and their accomplices.
This is why online moderation is important. I am all for freedom of speech, but it only takes one unhinged person to take venting as social license to do something extreme.
Venting online anger without some sort of moderation can quickly turn to:
'wait, I thought you guys were serious about mailing them bombs...'
Chose your words carefully when venting. Don't get caught up in echo chambers. Echo chambers are a really sneaky trap, since it's very easy to feel like you've found 'your people'. They are essentially online tribalism, and do not offer any insights outside of the main group's paradigm. Constant regurgitation of the same mantras (but with different contextual flair) just serves to entrench people in a given view, not expand the breadth of their thinking, and makes it seem like the only tool in the box is a hammer, when perhaps a a small screw driver would do the job.
can quickly turn to: ‘wait, I thought you guys were serious about mailing them bombs…’
I really think it should be assumed that a good number of those posting about making bombs (or any number of other acts of violence) are, indeed, trying to incite people to do such things. It's not all innocent venting being mistaken for calls to action.
Don’t get caught up in echo chambers. Echo chambers are a really sneaky trap, since it’s very easy to feel like you’ve found ‘your people’. They are essentially online tribalism, and do not offer any insights outside of the main group’s paradigm.
Another approach is not to worry so much about the quantity of people, even an alone-echo chamber might be described as a public blog. Instead of focus on quantity, focus on quality. Hate, dehumanization, violence, evil, apathy towards suffering - all things to avoid. Mob Mentality is a real problem, the psychology of large crowds can be an even more dangerous thing.
When conformity enforcers overwhelm diversity generators, all of us are in trouble. Spartans--fundamentalists, militia groups, fascists, and ultra-nationalists--can freeze the machinery of collective mind. A shutdown of urban diversity devastates that exercise of collective acumen we call an economy. Christian Fundamentalism has been shown by the research of sociologists Alfred Darnell and Darren E. Sherkat to retard the learning of children raised within its grasp. Darnell and Sherkat sum up a common Fundamentalist attitude in the following words: "No schooling is better than secular schooling." Then there's the paralysis of thought which outright battle brings. When World War I erupted, Sigmund Freud was horrified by the sudden "narrow-mindedness shown by [even] the best intellects, their obduracy, their inaccessibility to the most forcible arguments." Such closings of the mind may explain why authoritarians are prone to ignore it when their approaches flop. They often goose-step from one year to another rigidly glued to backfiring ways. -
Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century, Chapter: The Kidnap of Mass Mind, Page 203-204, Howard Bloom
Doesn't this just make Trump's case worse? He was under strict limits of what he could say on social media lest he "accidentally" intimidate witnesses, but he's still culpable if his cronies do it for him.
Georgia law requires the names of jurors to be public for the sake of transparency. So while Trump is a traitor, the juror's names thing isn't his doing.
His supporters though, they're absolutely going to be responsible once one of the jurors gets shot. And Trump will hold some of that responsibility for not keeping his cultists at bay.
True, but if he engages in intimidation against them that's still illegal, no? And against the terms of his bail?
Against the terms of his bail and only further strengthens Georgias RICO case against him.
Okay, so we have… obstruction of justice, terrorism, threats with intent….
Anything else we can throw at these traitors to get them launched into the sun? They don’t deserve to be on this planet, let alone remain free.
Fascists gonna fash. Time to make an example out of these terrorists to dissuade the others.
Brave jurors.
They're conscripts. Nobody asked them whether they'd like to die.
Whatever brain dead piece of cartiledge thought we needed more transparency into citizen lives has made justice harder to achieve.
My suspicion is that's part of the design
I guess we just need to keep putting these seditionist assholes in prison.
I'm glad my country keeps juror identity strictly confidential. The lawyers involved and even the judge do not know the names or anything else about the jurors in a given case.
That is done with the specific intention of preventing jury intimidation from criminals and their accomplices.
Screen shot from article
This is why online moderation is important. I am all for freedom of speech, but it only takes one unhinged person to take venting as social license to do something extreme.
Venting online anger without some sort of moderation can quickly turn to: 'wait, I thought you guys were serious about mailing them bombs...'
Chose your words carefully when venting. Don't get caught up in echo chambers. Echo chambers are a really sneaky trap, since it's very easy to feel like you've found 'your people'. They are essentially online tribalism, and do not offer any insights outside of the main group's paradigm. Constant regurgitation of the same mantras (but with different contextual flair) just serves to entrench people in a given view, not expand the breadth of their thinking, and makes it seem like the only tool in the box is a hammer, when perhaps a a small screw driver would do the job.
I really think it should be assumed that a good number of those posting about making bombs (or any number of other acts of violence) are, indeed, trying to incite people to do such things. It's not all innocent venting being mistaken for calls to action.
Another approach is not to worry so much about the quantity of people, even an alone-echo chamber might be described as a public blog. Instead of focus on quantity, focus on quality. Hate, dehumanization, violence, evil, apathy towards suffering - all things to avoid. Mob Mentality is a real problem, the psychology of large crowds can be an even more dangerous thing.
When conformity enforcers overwhelm diversity generators, all of us are in trouble. Spartans--fundamentalists, militia groups, fascists, and ultra-nationalists--can freeze the machinery of collective mind. A shutdown of urban diversity devastates that exercise of collective acumen we call an economy. Christian Fundamentalism has been shown by the research of sociologists Alfred Darnell and Darren E. Sherkat to retard the learning of children raised within its grasp. Darnell and Sherkat sum up a common Fundamentalist attitude in the following words: "No schooling is better than secular schooling." Then there's the paralysis of thought which outright battle brings. When World War I erupted, Sigmund Freud was horrified by the sudden "narrow-mindedness shown by [even] the best intellects, their obduracy, their inaccessibility to the most forcible arguments." Such closings of the mind may explain why authoritarians are prone to ignore it when their approaches flop. They often goose-step from one year to another rigidly glued to backfiring ways. - Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century, Chapter: The Kidnap of Mass Mind, Page 203-204, Howard Bloom
Doesn't this just make Trump's case worse? He was under strict limits of what he could say on social media lest he "accidentally" intimidate witnesses, but he's still culpable if his cronies do it for him.
Georgia law requires the names of jurors to be public for the sake of transparency. So while Trump is a traitor, the juror's names thing isn't his doing.
His supporters though, they're absolutely going to be responsible once one of the jurors gets shot. And Trump will hold some of that responsibility for not keeping his cultists at bay.
True, but if he engages in intimidation against them that's still illegal, no? And against the terms of his bail?
Against the terms of his bail and only further strengthens Georgias RICO case against him.
Okay, so we have… obstruction of justice, terrorism, threats with intent….
Anything else we can throw at these traitors to get them launched into the sun? They don’t deserve to be on this planet, let alone remain free.
Fuck these animals.