Corporate America is Just Office Space in Real Life

jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev – 560 points –
23

That is backwards.

Office Space was based on real life corporate America.

Unfortunately improving existing products does not bring additional subscriptions / revenue 🤡

Unfortunately improving existing products does not bring additional subscriptions / revenue 🤡

I mean, it technically does, just not by next quarterly report, which seems to be all some organizations are capable of caring about, lately.

Frequently it absolutely does. Just not in a gold rush kind of way which is what too many people want.

1 more...

Sounds so painful. We're integrating AI right N now instead of doing what customers asked us to do or instead of fixing a ton of bugs we have.

I hate corporate

Whenever we say some work is going to be difficult and time consuming now, management reflexively ask if we can fix it with AI. It’s like an excitable little kid getting a bicycle for their birthday and wanting to do everything on their bicycle now, including eating, sleeping and homework.

If you look back at the sci-fi movies that came out soon after lasers were invented, you could see that people had all sorts of crazy ideas of what a laser could be used to do and that a lot of them had absolutely no idea of what a laser really did. Ultimately, we've found out that most of those imagined uses were pure bullshit or extremely impractical, at least with the current state of the technology. It didn't mean that the technology was useless. We ended up finding all sorts of useful purposes for it that they had never imagined, like disk players or barcode scanners. It only means that it took time for people to better understand what the real world applications of the new technology was and a lot of the initial assumptions were dead wrong.

AI is going through the same process. It will take time before the technology's strengths and weaknesses are better understood by the masses so it can be better applied to more realistic uses. And for the commercialization of snake-oil applications for it remains confined to fringe markets.

Being able to sell shares to other buyers really fucked things up.

It's sad that the best most startups can hope for is to be bought by a giant corporation. Not a lot of people are interested in just having a successful long-term business.

making them better would mean more work, stress and ill conceived requirements for the programmers. I'm more in favor of marketing thrashing about on their own.

I'm more in favor of marketing thrashing about on their own.

Lol. Me too. But let's not say that part too loud, it'll be nice if they don't catch on, for awhile longer.

I actually want AI enhancements to many of the programs I use. I find them useful.

Now watch as I get tossed out the window.

The problem is that the areas us consumers would want it is not going to be place that companies put it. They're gunning as hard as they can to monetize and minimize costs. Not what is most useful

But I really do find them useful, so they are getting it right in at least some cases.

Those cases are probably not profitable and will become enshitifcated when the VC money runs out and they start trying to turn a profit, so enjoy it while it lasts 😂

I've mainly been using open-weight models I can run locally to back them, so it'll last as long as personal computers do.