As if the tip actually goes to the dashers.

Striker@lemmy.worldmod to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world – 565 points –
339

You are viewing a single comment

Flip it around - why would you work a job, any job, where you don't know your pay until after the work is done?

"Tipping" is rich-people speak for shifting the expense (and blame) to the customer.

They already know the pay. If the pay isn't enough without the tip, then maybe they should consider getting a different job.

You realize that gig economy is the neoliberal slang for a poverty class work, but without the rights of workers, right?

So you're criticizing people who are forced by the system in which we live, to be ordered around by a fucking algorithm, and then take abuse from people who have enough money to NOT work in the gig economy, but no where near enough to actually own the servant class they get off on abusing.

You realize that the gig economy is not my responsibility, right? I'm not criticizing the workers for being underpaid. I'm criticizing the exploiters for underpaying their workers. If you can't pay your workers enough, that is not my fault. You are not entitled to exploit anyone for your personal gain.

If the pay isn't enough without the tip, then maybe they should consider getting a different job.

I'm not criticizing the workers for being underpaid.

Study: When questioned about continuing to work for poverty wages, gig workers across the nation respond with resounding "guess I just didn't think about it because I'm so goddamned stupid" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ .

The first statement was meant as in these delivery services don't deserve to keep their workers. They should instead look for a better job that will pay them properly. But that's what these delivery services do...prey on the vulnerable that are desperate which is why there should be laws protecting them.

3 more...

The pay is about $2 per order, regardless of mileage. Dashers can typically complete 2-3 orders per hour, and pay for their own fuel. The base pay is absolutely not worth it.

They are paid approximately $4 to $6 per hour, and yet some people are still defending the practice and asking customers to pay extra on top of the food and the $10+ delivery charge...

Given their compensation model, all I can say is that if you are not willing to tip, and/or you are not willing to tip ahead of time, you absolutely should not use the service at all.

Practically nobody does uber as their main job, they do it because they either want/need extra money, or are struggling to survive at all. I know uberers, none of them would choose the job, but they can't find other work. There's an intentional lack of employment, in my country at least, to keep the workers moving forward; "Do for us, or end up like those people".

If your business requires you to exploit your workers in order to make a profit, then your business doesn't deserve to exist. Making excuses for the exploiters changes nothing.

If the business doesn't deserve to exist, why do customers keep supporting them? Why is the onus only on the workers to suffer?

That's actually an excellent question. You should look into why people who work for America's largest employer can only afford to shop at Walmart, have little to no benefits, no job security, and often qualify for food stamps (which is American taxpayers subsidizing their salaries). The owners of America's largest employer are worth like $140,000,000,000.

Hint: it's coercion.

"Free" market doesnt really work without regulation, otherwise we shift towards current business models where you, the customer, often dont really have the choice.

Why are customers responsible for ensuring that workers get paid fairly? I'm looking for a service. If your service cannot exist without exploiting your workers, then it doesn't deserve to exist. You are not entitled to exploit people for your own gain.

If you know the workers are being exploited, and you use the service anyway, how are you not partially responsible for exploiting them? It seems like you feel entitled to exploit them for your own gain as a customer. I agree that the employer is also responsible. A way to hold them accountable would be to eschew the service altogether. Otherwise, what incentive do they have to change?

I don't use these services, for that exact reason. I'd rather cut out the middle man and contact the restaurant directly and then pick up my own order. That way all the money goes to the restaurant, instead of some business who's only purpose is to extract money from other people's work.

If you think tipping, a current necessity to ensure proper pay, is not something you should be doing why don't you stop using food services which expect tipping?

They won't stop underpaying because you don't tip they'll just blame the worker. The one who can't quit, because there's not alot of work around, and they need food for survival

A tip before service is not a tip. It's coercion. Maybe we should consider adding regulation to this entire industry to ensure fair pay.

Ok, call your extra payment whatever name you want, and get the ball rolling on legislating new regulations to ensure fair pay. They deserve to get paid more, and when/if those regulations go through the drivers will have a better future.

That didn't answer the question, though. We both agree that drivers deserve to get paid more, so why not open up your wallet and start paying them more now? Why wait months or years for legislation to go through to force you to pay more, when the power to make sure your driver is paid well is sitting in the palm of your hand today? Your individual act of tipping or not tipping will do nothing to address the system at large, but it will do everything to ensure your driver driver gets paid fairly for the labor they perform while they serve you.

Why is it my responsibility to ensure they're paid fairly by me directly? It's the employer's responsibility to pay their workers fairly. If you can't pay your workers fairly, why does your business deserve to exist?

Why is it my responsibility to ensure they're paid fairly by me directly?

Because the price you pay for a service is a reflection of the relationship you have with the person providing that service, and to believe otherwise is something known as commodity fetishism

"What is, in fact, a social relation between people (between capitalists and exploited laborers) instead assumes "the fantastic form of a relation between things."

We are defined both individually and societally by the relationships that we form with other people.

If you can't pay your workers fairly, why does your business deserve to exist?

It does not deserve to exist. However, it does exist, drivers drive for them and are not paid enough for their labor, and you continue to use it despite all of that. I'll ask again: why don't you personally be the change you want to see in the world and pay them more now?

I’ll ask again: why don’t you personally be the change you want to see in the world and pay them more now?

Because it's not my responsibility to subsidize your business. If a tip is required to get good service, then the question becomes how much of a tip required to get good service. It pits customers against workers, while you brush it off as just the cost of getting good service. But if people decide that the cost of your business plus a tip is too much, then no one will use your business. That's capitalism...it works both ways. You can either decide to make less profit and pay your workers fairly without putting the onus onto your customers, or you can close the business. You are not entitled to exploit both your workers and your customers.

Man, I don't know what you think we're talking about, but I'm talking about DoorDash and DoorDash drivers in reality as it is today. I do not own DoorDash, so you are not subsidizing my business. The service offered is just bringing your food to your door, there isn't really any "good" service that can be used to justify a tip or vice versa. If people decide that the cost of a DoorDash delivery plus a tip is too much, they won't close the app and go get their food themselves--they will just not tip like OP did and like you do and they will both receive a message like the one above. If you want to have your order picked up quickly, you have to place a winning bid.

THAT is what capitalism is--not some idealized pursuit of profit that refuses to exploit its workers; but a house of cards built out of dozens of competing contradictions, full of people hoping to leave someone else holding the bag when it all comes crashing down. I recommend reading Contradiction 7 of Seventeen Contradictions and The End of Capitalism, "The Contradictory Unity of Production and realisation". It's all about how capitalists are fighting the competing contradictions of wanting to sell their goods for as much as possible while paying their laborers as little as possible, and what the broader social impacts of that may be.

I'm talk about "you" figuratively, as in one of the middle-man businesses that only exist to make money off of other people's work, not "you" literally.

Doordash and other such services merely a convenient way to connect restaurants to more delivery drivers instead of hiring their own. On the surface that's a decent business model. In reality, it just exploits drivers and charges restaurants for the privilege, and then charges customers and asks for tips that don't necessarily all go to the drivers. At some point though, customers are going to decide its too expensive, or in this case stop tipping which only results in worse service and complaints. It's already happening. When real taxi services charge less for delivery, a service they use to provide before these fake taxi companies started, then the tides will turn. Unless Doordash can exploit their drivers more, in which case they risk losing drivers. That's capitalism...your company is as much a customer as it is a service provider, but most companies refuse to accept that and instead exploit their workers. That's why laws should exist to prevent that. That's why we should demand those laws, instead of just subsidizing the wages of workers through the company that's exploiting them in the first place.

I’m all for ending tipping culture. And a tip before service may not be a tip, but as long as this is how it’s set up, it’s the current way we must do things.

Just like if you want someone to do some handy work for you, you can go on Craigslist and say “need someone to do ‘x’. Will pay $150” and workers who search on there for jobs will decide whether or not it’s worth it for them to do the job. This job just so happens to be giving you food or a ride.

Right, and if a company can't pay their workers enough, then workers are not obligated to work there. It is not my responsibility to ensure your workers are paid fairly, regardless of how things are currently set up.

In the UK (and a lot of Europe) tipping is completely optional. We only tip for exceptional service or if we've made the server's life difficult. It's an optional extra for the server.

At this point, it's so endemic, in the US, that it likely needs to be fixed from the governmental level, but that doesn't make it something that can't be complained about.

American workers rights really scare me. Tipping being allowed to subsidise wages is awful, but so is the safety legislation, and child labour laws. We have issues in the UK obviously, but they're relatively minor in comparison.

It's only expected because consumers with a similar mentality keep supplying the bandaids to the business. That, and poor local and federal regulation.

Personally I tip 20% or more at most Restaurants. I draw the line at tipping before service as well. They aren’t even pretending anymore that it’s about service.

That said, I don’t use any Gig economy service; I don’t believe in their business models at all, and part of what you are saying is why. Workers shouldn’t be taking on the burden, companies should.

I do tip at some pre-service places that I’m a regular at, but I’ve run into some pretty ridiculous stores asking for tips where nothing warrants it. I try to be fair, but it is getting ridiculous.

One of the most ridiculous tipping related thing happened a couple of weeks ago. I was ordering some pantry items from an online store that shipped to me (shipping fee was separate, based on how much is purchased). They had a vinegar that I couldn't find locally or online elsewhere, and since they are a small family business, I decided to order a few other things to support them even though all their prices were a bit higher than other places. When checking out, they asked for a 20-25% tip to help support their small family business. That just made me mad. Never going to shop from them again.

Yes that’s completely ridiculous. You’re helping their small business by shopping there in the first place.

3 more...
6 more...

Tips are no longer tips and companies have successfully forced us to pay their employees for them.

It's not the customer's fault. In addition to us paying their wages we have to trust some rando to do a good job with zero evidence they will.

If they don't fulfill your expectations, you inform DoorDash. They hand out full refunds like candy.

That "rando" is not a DoorDash employee. You're hiring a contractor through a broker, not asking a restaurant to send a waitress to your table.

The employee-waitress can't refuse you service without getting herself fired, but a contractor-driver can tell you exactly where and how far to shove your bullshit offer.

There's nothing to flip, gratuity and wages should be separate things. And minimum, standard living wages should be paid.

America’s view that tipping is normal needs to change.

How about an adequate wage instead, like the rest of the developed world?

Well no, tipping is how you show your appreciation for a service. You are bring selfish if you don't at least tip a minimal amount.

Please tip your plumber, i mean you do appreciate their work dont you?
15% would be fair wouldnt it?
You should tip anyone or dont you appreciate what they do for you? What? You already paid them? But you didnt yet appreciate them yet! How could you!

The way this comment section is going I'd expect them to beet the plummer.

My sons a plumber and he just got $100 tip for doing a job, but it was right before Christmas and the client was really rich. I don’t condone tipping but if I do tip it’s usually in cash

A reasonable required base level of pay for service is necessary before a tip is showing appreciation.

There is a base level of pay. That doesn't mean you get to hate the poor person who is stuck serving you. You should appreciate what others do for you.

Where did you get the idea that wanting reasonable wages before tips means I hate servers?

Learn to read.

6 more...