With quantum computers you can become a god that doesn't know what it's doing. π
You donβt need quantum computers for that.
This tracks with my assessment of the two likely personalities of software engineers, either narcissistic or anxious with imposter syndrome.
Both at once all the time ?
Not at the same time, but in alternation, sure. It's all reactions to underlying shame and inadequacy beliefs/feelings which are there all the time I expect.
I disagree: as a Bachus of Programming I have successfully managed to at the same time both be a God of Programming AND having no clue what's going on.
(The real joke behind the joke is that today I'm doing Shader programming so that's quite close to reality and I could definitelly do with large amounts of wine or at least beer).
Here too the SchrΓΆdinger's equations apply: a programmer's state during coding is a superposition of both of these states until actually trying to run the code, at which point it collapses into one of the two states.
I'm pretty firmly in the second category only. I have had the first a few times, but when whatever thing you were so stoked about inevitably fries or fails a few weeks in, you quickly learn to stop doing #1 altogether.
s/"a god"/"finished for the day"
It do be like that
Thatβs not true, there is a third state:
βI donβt care anymore, Iβll drive Uber if it comes to thatβ.
4th state: I don't care, I just use AI to write my code.
The trick there is that you'll be developing forever unless you get your hands dirty, because it like 80% works, and you need 99% to put it in any kind of prod.
Have you seen how American corps code? 80% is GM release ready to go.
Honestly I've never had the displeasure. Or financial benefit.
GOD | DOG
Start working in morning - Photo 2
Take a break and come back - Photo 1
flow state
Come back next day - Photo 2
The saga continues... (Wu tang, Wu tang)
Tell that to Microsoft!
bool?
Programmers have it so easy nowadays.
You should try programming in BASIC on the Atari.
Isn't that first artwork from the Atari BASIC book cover? I suffered enough with BASIC on my TI-99 and IBM XT, I can't imagine how rough the Atari version was.
Basic on commodore or turbo pascal on the icon, my first programming languages. Just started learning C++, shoulda started this 30 years ago
Turbo Pascal was great and a big step up over what you could do with BASIC. Good luck with C++.
Thanks, and yes it was
GOTO 42069
i am a god who has no idea what they're doing π₯Ί
The more time a coder spends in #2, the more I trust them.
Man I love that old Atari art.
I would say there are two types of devs.
The HACKER MAN knowing everything, always have the only solution and being boss in their realm
The DAUBTER thinking they know too less, always searching for the best solution for the problem and trying to get as many information to solve the problem as possible
Even having the imposter syndrome as a big problem for mental health. I genuinely have the opinion it makes the better devs.
There's a third state: "Where's the documentation on how to do , so I don't have to steal it from a GPL code?"
I am a god because it works but I have no idea why it works
Very binary, much wow.
With quantum computers you can become a god that doesn't know what it's doing. π
You donβt need quantum computers for that.
This tracks with my assessment of the two likely personalities of software engineers, either narcissistic or anxious with imposter syndrome.
Both at once all the time ?
Not at the same time, but in alternation, sure. It's all reactions to underlying shame and inadequacy beliefs/feelings which are there all the time I expect.
I disagree: as a Bachus of Programming I have successfully managed to at the same time both be a God of Programming AND having no clue what's going on.
(The real joke behind the joke is that today I'm doing Shader programming so that's quite close to reality and I could definitelly do with large amounts of wine or at least beer).
Here too the SchrΓΆdinger's equations apply: a programmer's state during coding is a superposition of both of these states until actually trying to run the code, at which point it collapses into one of the two states.
I'm pretty firmly in the second category only. I have had the first a few times, but when whatever thing you were so stoked about inevitably fries or fails a few weeks in, you quickly learn to stop doing #1 altogether.
s/"a god"/"finished for the day"
It do be like that
Thatβs not true, there is a third state:
βI donβt care anymore, Iβll drive Uber if it comes to thatβ.
Do you work for Sony? Games industry layoffs not the result of corporate greed and those affected should "drive an Uber", says ex-Sony president
4th state: I don't care, I just use AI to write my code.
The trick there is that you'll be developing forever unless you get your hands dirty, because it like 80% works, and you need 99% to put it in any kind of prod.
Have you seen how American corps code? 80% is GM release ready to go.
Honestly I've never had the displeasure. Or financial benefit.
GOD | DOG
Tell that to Microsoft!
bool?Programmers have it so easy nowadays.
You should try programming in BASIC on the Atari.
Isn't that first artwork from the Atari BASIC book cover? I suffered enough with BASIC on my TI-99 and IBM XT, I can't imagine how rough the Atari version was.
Basic on commodore or turbo pascal on the icon, my first programming languages. Just started learning C++, shoulda started this 30 years ago
Turbo Pascal was great and a big step up over what you could do with BASIC. Good luck with C++.
Thanks, and yes it was
GOTO 42069i am a god who has no idea what they're doing π₯Ί
The more time a coder spends in #2, the more I trust them.
Man I love that old Atari art.
I would say there are two types of devs.
The HACKER MAN knowing everything, always have the only solution and being boss in their realm
The DAUBTER thinking they know too less, always searching for the best solution for the problem and trying to get as many information to solve the problem as possible
Even having the imposter syndrome as a big problem for mental health. I genuinely have the opinion it makes the better devs.
There's a third state: "Where's the documentation on how to do , so I don't have to steal it from a GPL code?"
I am a god because it works but I have no idea why it works
Immo stultorum deus sum.