American automakers are losing the race to make more fuel-efficient vehicles

boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 262 points –
American automakers are losing the race to make more fuel-efficient vehicles
theverge.com
69

"American Automakers Refuse to Participate in Race to Make Accessible, Fuel-Efficient Vehicles"

Fixed that title for you, Verge.

They are, however, winning the race to make more gas guzzling profit generators that destroy this planet for the benefit of their shareholders.

Which is apparently what the average consider wants or at least expects.

American* consumer. Around the world most popular models are smaller than the American ones. And those expectations are driven by marketing from those car companies to circumvent the safety/emission laws set up for cars in the us

I agree with you, but this happens in Europe as well.

Tying acceptable emissions to the car weight made SUVs very attractive for the car makers. And people lap it up like noone's business.

And the sales are driven by, what one can only assume is, a vastly disproportionate percentage of tiny, tiny penises amongst the American population

It's also gotten surprisingly difficult to find a used car at a reasonable price (even via craigslist). Sedans "aren't popular anymore" because they're not advertised, but they're ubiquitous. It's just the lumbering giants that run like shit are also ubiquitous and makes being on the road fucking dangerous in a sedan because of poor sightlines and idiotic curb weights.

And more dangerous to their drivers as well, because while they may "win" collisions, they also roll over much easier.

Until the exemptions for “light trucks” go away this won’t change. The current CAFE standards reward automakers for making even larger, less efficient and more dangerous “passenger” vehicles every year.

2 more...

I thought they already lost during the OPEC oil crisis and then lobbied congress to put import restrictions on foreign cars to save themselves.

They did, decades ago. That is no longer an issue.

Now we have current efficiency standards that focus on cars. However trucks have much lower requirements because businesses might need additional capabilities. No individual would ever buy a truck as a personal vehicle , right? So you have these criteria meant to give a break to businesses, but ever larger vehicles mean that personal vehicles now also qualify. They can be made more cheaply, with more profit.

Somehow, they didn’t consider the criteria would be abused for more profitable personal vehicles

  • Pickup truck? Clearly a contractor so let’s give you a break
  • All wheel drive and high clearance? Clearly a rare specialty off-road vehicle that needs a break
  • Seats 7+, even if they’re only toddlers? Clearly a transportation service, so needs a break in efficiency to carry more passengers
  • Tow hitch? Clearly in need of extra torque and heavy duty frame for whatever business need you’re towing

How can you win when you're running in the opposite direction?

This just in: Obese Man perpetually on the couch isn't going to finish the marathon, experts say.

They don't have to worry, because the Buy American provisions in recent legislation (passed under both Trump and Biden) protects them from competition by more fuel efficient foreign competitors.

True, but in time they will be able to sell only in the US as their cars will not be allowed anywhere else. So if they will want to compete outside US, they will need two lines of the same products. Then they will realize that it will be less expensive to keep only the one that can sell in more places.
If they have not failed in the meantime.

The classic definition of "American" cars has really fallen apart. Stellantis is an international consortium at the management level. GM and Ford have extensive manufacturing in Canada and Mexico. Honda, Toyota, VW, etc assemble most of their North American vehicles in the US. Parts come from all over the world. Even if the part assemblies are made in the US, supplies (or the component supplies) are globally sourced.

Phrased another way, can you really call it American if the lithium is mined in Africa, refined in China, assembled into a battery in Ohio, assembled as a car in Mexico, under the direction of a company headquartered in Detroit? Same for steel, glass, etc?

At what point does it become, or cease to be, an American car?

(In 1984, this question was directly answered by Honda, by creating their first assembly plant in Marysville, OH. Based on the laws at the time, this meant anything manufactured there qualified as an "American" car, not subject to import taxes and restrictions)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Real-world fuel economy in model year 2022 rose slightly to 26 miles per gallon, according to the EPA’s latest Automotive Trends Report.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized that rule back in 2022, and earlier this year, it proposed even higher standards for cars made between 2027 and 2032.

Numbers for real-world fuel economy tend to be about 25 percent lower than official compliance data might show, according to Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity.

Average fuel economy for Ford, General Motors, and Jeep and Dodge parent company Stellantis last year ranged between about 21mpg and 23mpg.

Supersized passenger vehicles burn through more gas than smaller cars, which also means that they create more tailpipe pollution that worsens air quality and causes climate change.

Fortunately, the emission rate for planet-heating carbon dioxide from new vehicles still dropped 3 percent to a record low last year, the EPA reports.


The original article contains 689 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

It this Onion News? No one can use "american automakers" and "fuel-efficency" in the same phrase!