đ¤â That didn't happen in the the novel though
Did the question of androids dreaming of electric sheep actually get answered in the novel? đ¤
Only implicitly, total ripoff.
A lot of what happened in the movie didn't happen in the novel.
And the whole Mercerism thing isn't even in the movie despite being a huge part of the novel.
But we got tears in rain instead.
For sure. I'm not complaining. I like both the book and the film even though they're quite different. Or maybe because of it.
Every night, as me and my wife are going to sleep, I lean over and whisper into her ear, "It's too bad you're not going to live. But then again, who does?"
That movie is so slept on, it's honestly one of my favorites. The book is really good too, I love the dialogue.
"Uh yes, hi, how are you? I have something, um, emergent to report!"
lol i just rewatched the blade runner episode of Bob's Burgers last night. i never saw the movie!
That reminds me of this FASCINATING deep dive by Innuendo Studies on agency / protagony. Warning: while not technically NSFW... caution is still advised.
Telling a robot that he's "done a man's job" is a Gaff.
See....this is what teenage cyber bulling should be instead of catty bitches calling someone fat over and over.
........ and a fully functioning uterus
I mean, they are organic, so yeah, it's not impossible one could create offspring with another replicant
Actually, her having a child proves Deckard was one all along.
No it doesn't. How does it prove Deckard is a replicant versus proving Tyrell Corps had become just that good at replicating life. In both Blade Runner movies to prove something was replicant they had to get electron microscope close to find printing on cells. Perhaps Rachael was just that human. Unless it was explained somewhere I missed.
đ¤â That didn't happen in the the novel though
Did the question of androids dreaming of electric sheep actually get answered in the novel? đ¤
Only implicitly, total ripoff.
A lot of what happened in the movie didn't happen in the novel.
And the whole Mercerism thing isn't even in the movie despite being a huge part of the novel.
But we got tears in rain instead.
For sure. I'm not complaining. I like both the book and the film even though they're quite different. Or maybe because of it.
Every night, as me and my wife are going to sleep, I lean over and whisper into her ear, "It's too bad you're not going to live. But then again, who does?"
Oh, it's the D.E.N.N.I.S. system:
Demonstrate Value
Engage Physically
Nurture Dependence <- YOU ARE HERE
Neglect Emotionally
Inspire Hope
Separate Entirely
What a sweet tradition! đ
That movie is so slept on, it's honestly one of my favorites. The book is really good too, I love the dialogue.
"Uh yes, hi, how are you? I have something, um, emergent to report!"
lol i just rewatched the blade runner episode of Bob's Burgers last night. i never saw the movie!
That reminds me of this FASCINATING deep dive by Innuendo Studies on agency / protagony. Warning: while not technically NSFW... caution is still advised.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
agency / protagony
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Telling a robot that he's "done a man's job" is a Gaff.
See....this is what teenage cyber bulling should be instead of catty bitches calling someone fat over and over.
........ and a fully functioning uterus
I mean, they are organic, so yeah, it's not impossible one could create offspring with another replicant
Actually, her having a child proves Deckard was one all along.
No it doesn't. How does it prove Deckard is a replicant versus proving Tyrell Corps had become just that good at replicating life. In both Blade Runner movies to prove something was replicant they had to get electron microscope close to find printing on cells. Perhaps Rachael was just that human. Unless it was explained somewhere I missed.
Little radiation as she sleeps should take care of that.
And the immortals in Highlander are from the planet Zeist.