They All Got Mysterious Brain Diseases. They’re Fighting to Learn Why.
nytimes.com
Investigation into Canada's New Brunswick brain syndrome is being blocked by the province, whose claims that the syndrome is various existing diseases have been debunked by federal experts, who suggest that the provincial government controlled by its forestry industry is blocking the investigation to retain tourism and industry.
Thankfully, the patient was Canadian so the wife survived the encounter.
I'm really glad this is getting proper media attention. This has been going on for a while and I haven't seen much outside of small blips in Canadian media until now.
Investigative journalists need to look into this. Oh wait, there aren't any left because evil corporations own 90% of the media outlets now.
Canadaland has been covering this. They are independent journalists and it's important to support this type of reporting.
Good to hear they exist, thanks for letting me know!
this is investigative journalism
Investigate Journalists still exist, they are just bloggers who tell us to do our own research.
It sucks. I'd much rather the nameless investigative journalist have the reputation of an established (and importantly, trusted) press agency standing behind them.
Investigative journalism, nowadays, is useless unless it comes from a highly trusted individual, or with the backing of a trusted entity. And that's not what we have these days. We have borderline propaganda produced by idiots who have no concept of context and barely any real understanding of the topic they are trying to convey in the first place.
Oh, and Opinion columns presented as fact. We have those too.
A well loved coworker died of Crutzfeld Jakob disease this year. That shit is terrifying.
He was in his 50s and went from normal, to nonverbal, easily startled, and not recognizing close family, to dead in a span of like 4 months.
Absolutely terrifying.
Yeah, prion diseases are truly the stuff of nightmares. No cure, can exist indefinitely in the soil, and they basically turn you into a zombie before you die a horribly painful death as your brain literally falls apart.
And there's often no way to get a conclusive diagnosis until you're dead. So you keep getting things thrown at the wall, keep hoping, and keep getting it dashed. It gets to the point where it's obvious that's what it is, but you're generally quite advanced by then.
Well shit. Not what I was expecting to read in this article. ALS, Parkinsons, and Alzheimers are the three diseases that most terrify me. Something that hollows out who you are, leaving you semi conscious in a waking prison built of your own body. You can lose limbs and still be you. You can't lose your brain and still be you. It's a disease that destroys the ephemeral "you," leaving only a husk of your former self. To think that we could be the ones causing it, with our massive over-use of herbicides, is equally terrifying. Because just like with PFAS exacerbating all cancers, there are rich, influential firms with powerful lobbying groups actively fighting against the very regulation that could save us.
This was actively covered up through the strong-arming of the person in charge of the autopsies.
I completely agree with everything you're saying, but I want to point out one thing that I absolutely hate about your citation:
This gives 0 context at all. I know scientific literacy is terrible in America, but this means nothing.
What is the lowest detectable concentration? Is it 1 PPT? 15000 PPT is what, 15 PPM? Is that bad? I don't know.
This type of wording is used intentionally to make things sound worse than they are, and it works.
I'm not saying they aren't, I'm saying I don't know if they are or not. This quote did nothing to inform me of how bad it is, just a fact that is entirely meaningless on its own, without context or education. If anything, it enraged me without knowing the facts, and that's (potentially) very dangerous writing.
As if I needed another reason to feel good about not putting herbicides and pesticides on my yard. Who knows what prolonged exposure to that junk is doing to people that we don't even begin to understand yet.
Hmm, they shut down the 48 patients suffering from odd neurodegerative diseases in 2021....
What the fuckkk. :/
Well that's not terrifying.
Interestingly, the wikipedia article on glyphosates says basically nothing about their role in Parkinson's and instead focuses on debunking cancer claims.
Absolutely not suspicious at all.
It's because Wikipedia requires sourcing on claims and Bayer puts in extra effort to get scientific papers removed or "debunked" (find the tiniest, irrelevant flaw and then lobby hard to get it retracted).
If you’re convinced and have receipts, you can report the user to the COI noticeboard.
They aren't saying the issue is Wikipedia. They're saying that the actual sources are being either revoked by the publishers, or excessive money is dumped into studies that would muddy the water about the findings of any negative sources.
Ah, makes sense. But my optimist side says that surely the paper would be republished.
From what I understand from the article is that the correlation is there, but no causality (yet). I find it extremely good how cautious the doctor is phrasing his analysis and the article is also not blowing up where nothing is proven.
Figuring out the Parkinson's linkage is challenging too, because glyphosate is just one of many chemicals used in agricultural settings. It wouldn't be surprising for the correlation to be caused by another chemical with strong evidence of casual linkage to Parkinson's that itself is correlated with glyphosate, like Parquat. (Since Parquat is a herbicide, places that used it may also use (or have switched to) glyphosate.) Totally worth continued scientific study.
You know you can add properly sourced info to Wikipedia right?
This is frightening.
And I made it about two more paragraphs after this before closing the window. This is just too much bad news first thing in the morning. Sigh.
The Canadaland podcast has been covering this story for a while now.
Canadaland has lost a lot of credibility with me after all the shit Jesse Brown has been spewing post October 7.
I won’t deny that their coverage of this issue has been good though
Canadaland is much more than just Jesse Brown though.
I'm aware of that, but when the founder and main host is spreading false and misleading information on the show, it calls into question the whole enterprise.
I do occasionally tune in to episodes not hosted by him, with some skepticism if the issue is in any way politically charged.
I think I've listened to every Canadaland episode since like 2016 or so, and I've yet to hear him say anything even remotely approaching what people accuse him of.
That said I don't follow his X account or anything.
Sounds like the government is covering something up.
Nah...
https://archive.is/qiDwJ
Thanks for the preservation, but it’s probably better to read the article from the source (which I have unlocked with the gift function) while it’s still up.
(Also, archive.today links automatically redirect to the fastest domain for you.)
Not when the source article requires javascript to display. Some of us don't let arbitrary web sites run scripts on our computers.
I don’t understand that, but you do you.
Holy shit that is dystopic as hell.
God how I fucking hate these trope-y headlines that modern journalists think will make them competitive with the Internet
::: spoiler New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for New York Times:
::: spoiler Wikipedia - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for Wikipedia:
::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/14/magazine/canada-brain-disease-dementia.html?unlocked\_article\_code=1.D04.uRdV.-zQyFlcrK6k8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New\_Brunswick\_neurological\_syndrome\_of\_unknown\_cause ::: Media Bias Fact Check | bot support