[Rant] A few days ago, I asked if Mint would run okay on a Lenovo T460 (I appreciate all the advice). I got it working, but the installation was a big pain and I totally blame Lenovo.
I got the T460 refurbished and I really didn't want to run Windows 10 on it. I last used Linux for any real length of time a good 20 years ago, so I'm pretty inexperienced with it at this point and I had to figure out how to install it myself.
They made it unreasonably difficult to first install an OS from a USB stick. I had to go into the BIOS, turn UEFI to legacy, turn off secure boot, reboot to boot from the USB stick, install Mint, then turn legacy back to UEFI to get it to boot from the hard drive. This took about 2 hours of trying to figure it out by doing a lot of forums reading.
I do not blame the Mint community or the Linux community as a whole. There is absolutely no reason that it should have been that hard to install Mint on that notebook.
I don't even think getting into the BIOS once time should be necessary, but changing a BIOS setting so you can install the OS and changing it back so you can run the OS off the internal drive is just ridiculous and I find it hard to believe Lenovo couldn't have just made it easier. I'm fairly convinced this was intentional on their part.
I'm not an IT professional or anything, but I know enough to figure this stuff out with effort, but it shouldn't have taken that effort. It should have been almost plug-and-play. This is 2024. The notebook isn't even 10 years old.
Is there actually a good reason for this or are they just kissing Microsoft's ass?
This has nothing to do with Lenovo perse, this is the average experience for every laptop I've owned which had Secure Boot turned on.
You know what is fun? Having your Dell basically bricking because Fedora starts shipping a new version of shim-x64 which completely fails the UEFI handover to bootloader. Leaving you unable to boot at all, so no chance of reaching rescue mode. Then more fun times of booting a live environment from a usb stick after going through the same hoops you went through, finding out how to decrypt your BTRFS partitions, manually mounting and chrooting them so you can finally downgrade the offending package.
Linux and Secure Boot just isn't a great combination if you ask me.
That sounds pretty awful, sorry that you went through that.
And that's just the quick summary, first time I just restored a backup. But as my system immediately failed again after updating I started digging and came across some obscure posts of Lenovo users (ok, maybe Lenovo isn't that great with implementing Secure Boot after all đ) having the same issue and devised that rescue plan. Quite the nightmare indeed, but at the other hand it also taught me some new skills. After going through the same routine on each update of that package I ended up excluding it from updates in DNF.
Don't now if the issue was ever resolved, I've since stepped away from Fedora as I've just had too many of these weird issues with it on each new release. Creating bug reports and the accompanying warm feeling of helping to improve the Linux ecosystem is nice, but in the end I just need to get work done.
It's impossible to make the situation with BIOS easier. Incorrect boot order and secure boot are enabled by default for security and Windows compatibility reasons. Though I never heard that it's required to turn on legacy mode and change it back. Probably it's a highly model-specific thing. And btw secure boot is Mint's fault. It just doesn't support it yet
Itâs not even machine specific. UEFI vs legacy bios boot mode is universally supported in all but the latest systems. If OP had to switch to legacy boot mode then they probably made the USB âincorrectlyâ. Youâd run into the same issue on windows if you made the USB boot drive for legacy bios mode.
Idk. I use Etcher and it never asks for any modes. Rufus is different though
I'd love to know what I did wrong if you can tell me. I used Etcher like the instructions on Mint's website told me to.
Not the case. I'm typing this on a Surface laptop running Mint with Secure Boot enabled. Even the bootable Mint USB can be run with Secure Boot turned on.
Hmm then I guess I made a mistake
Well now I'm just surprised considering this is a 2016 notebook. They should be supporting a feature that old, shouldn't they?
Some distros support it but it's only like 4 or 6 of them. I guess it's really hard to support and maintain such feature
This sounds like it was strictly the fault of the USB load. If you make a UEFI USB (you should use Ventoy, it's great btw) all you would need to do is shut off Secure Boot and install.
Most bootable drives don't support Secure Boot. You turn it off, do the install, and turn it back on if you want it. I personally just leave it off.
Outside of those caveats everything you described is industry-standard stuff. Nothing to do with Lenovo.
Being unable to boot from a USB drive in UEFI mode sounds like a Mint problem. I just booted from an Ubuntu LTS USB on a similar machine, installed with all default BIOS. Haven't touched Secure Boot either. No trouble.
Hm. Maybe I should have tried a different flavor of Linux in terms of ease of install. But Mint seemed like the best choice for me and now that it's actually up and running, it's fine.
By all means, if it works already, don't fuck with it.
This community hates on Ubuntu but these are the kinds of corner cases that can make or break a new user's journey. Experienced users can resolve those with no emotion and we often discount the difficulty and importance of such issues to less experienced users. There's been a lot of work put in Ubuntu to tackle these kinds of issues - paper cuts. Recall the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. This is why I won't stop recommending Ubuntu LTS for new users.
It's good to know for the future if nothing else, so I appreciate it.
Wow what a ride. Congrats on making it work, I'm not sure if I wouldn't have given up at some point. Great job!
About kissing M$'s ass, don't get me started on updating the BIOS on a HP Laptop, they require you to do that in Windows cause it's the only way to get their downloader to run. So it's not only Lenovo's Laptops that don't play nice with Linux.
I didn't even want to take a chance with an HP considering how fucked up their printers are.
I have HP Zbook, Linux works fine. There is a BIOS bug that linux boot acknowledges and moves forward with...just an annoying few intial mesaages during bootup
That is ridiculous and it does sound like a Lenovo problem.
I'm running Mint on a Surface Laptop (which was difficult to install because Microsoft), but getting Secure Boot working only required changing the UEFI settings to allow non-Microsoft Secure Boot certificates. With that set Mint boots just fine both with Secure Boot enabled and disabled. So do USB installation ISOs.
Secure Boot can still be a pain. To get Virtualbox working with it enabled required signing several kernel modules which took a while to figure out.
Mint is great though. After distrohopping for years I finally decided I wanted to just use the OS and GUI, not play around with them and I came back to Mint. The latest versions of Mint just work and work for years once they're installed. For me, going back to Windows (especially W11) feels like punishment. I hope you enjoy the switch.
Admittedly, I've only been able to play with it on and off today, but I am really liking it so far (except Firefox, which apparently no longer has a compact mode). I've had to use Macs for years for work reasons, but I don't have to anymore and I said to myself that when my ancient Macbook died, I would replace it with something that runs Linux. MacOS is okay, not terrific (I hate how much RAM it uses though). I don't mind using it, but I am not going to pay Apple's prices now that I don't have to just because it's less annoying than Windows. So Linux is the perfect answer!
On that note, I've been amazed how well Mint works with just 8GB of memory. I've had Firefox and Chrome running with plenty of open tabs, Thunderbird, Libreoffice Calc, and a half dozen other programs open while running W10 in Virtualbox. Mint just takes it in stride.
Use KVM I stead of Virtual box. It is way faster
I use a W10 VM for processing individual files once a week or so. With the required 2 Windows programs it takes about 3 minutes to complete the task and shut down the OS. Not worth switching.
Virtual manager with make it run so much faster though. Also its not a bad idea to have a few VMs just for fun anyway
Thanks for the update
Well, you shouldn't have to turn UEFI off to boot from the USB stick. That one could actually be on Mint. Or on the way the stick was created. It's been a while since I messed with this stuff but by now a typical Linux installation medium should be able to boot with UEFI.
The secure boot is enabled by default so that only signed operating systems and not some malware can boot the computer. And I guess it's legitimate to not have the keys of all the Linux distributions under the sun in there.
I'm not a secure boot expert, but it sounds like Mint should be supported anyway, according to Wikipedia:
Support doesn't mean that their key is in there, though. It could also just mean that it has the ability to store its own key.
That sounds extremely infuriating! Regarding Lenovo and Linux Mint, I actually had a very good experience with them a little over a year ago. I bought a new IdeaCentre 5i pre-built desktop tower and had zero issues installing Mint on it. All I had to do was press F12 and select to boot from the bootable USB to install, no screwing with the BIOS or anything. But I've never tried installing Linux on a laptop. I only use desktops.
It was so stupid. F12 should have been all it took, but it didn't even recognize the USB drive existed.
Well done. Itâs a Lenovo issue. Had to do the same thing recently for a friends laptop and did the same dance.
I have some IT background so kind of knew what to look for but it still was a pita.
It's just so stupid. Obviously other notebooks don't have this issue. Some people are blaming Mint for not doing anything about it, but I'm still blaming Lenovo mostly.
You should have been able to boot from USB and install fully in UEFI mode with Secure Boot enabled, but sometimes the method you use to make the bootable USB can screw that up. I've always had good luck with Ventoy.
That's surprising, Thinkpad x240 owner here. With all the os i installed on it i never had to do such overcomplicated manipulation, just bios entering + boot on usb.
Maybe it's just a 460 thing?
I don't feel like that's exclusive to Lenovo, fwiw. I have an Asus laptop, and it went like that for me installing Linux from a USB stick. It was a hassle and you're right that it seems harder than it needs to be.
I don't have any idea why it's like that, but it feels like it's a better option than someone being able to walk up to my PC/laptop/whatever and change my os just by using a thumb drive without any other hoops to go through. That's just where I stand on the issue, but you're right that it sucks for the owner/user.
If you walk up with a Windows usb, what would Happen? Would you just be able to reinstall windows and even have it activated by the key in the TPM? I think so.
I guess I don't know - I think you'd still have to go into BIOS and switch it to boot from USB? I don't know about the rest of it, but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't just start installation. Unless it's a thumb drive specifically tailored to take over someone's system?
So yes, you could reinstall Windows, but it would still require a reboot to BIOS to allow for it. Am I missing something? What's the big "gotcha" that I missed? I genuinely don't know, and since I am not an expert on installation of OSes, if you could enlighten me, that could be useful for me.
I'm not very sure myself, thats why I phrased it that way ^^ wasn't supposed to be a gotcha.
Didn't try in a long time and maybe even tried without sacure boot, but all the times I put a windows USB in a windows machine and told it to boot from it (without entering bios, just a boot selection by hitting the right key) it just started so you could just reinstall windows, even with the old installation being moved to windows.old, so it could be searched.
Could be totally wrong here.
Hell, I could be wrong too :-P I've never gone in that direction - only adding a Linux dual boot from USB stick. That sounds kinda scary, and would definitely make it easy.
Well, damn. Thanks for warning me about that possibility - looked like more steps that included BIOS last I checked, but as I said, I've never needed the process.
ÂŻ\_(ă)_/ÂŻ
Edit: I should note that I have installed Windows from a USB stick recently, I've just never already had another OS installed and then going to Windows. Most of my experience is installing a Linux flavor for dual boot.
Yeah, I'm probably going to put some research in, as I don't really like the thought ^^
Thanks for being critical and not just believing a random stranger on the internet
Haha - you too! I am also going to have to look into that, just in case đ
I recently installed it on a t480 while distrohopping. I didn't need to turn off uefi, secure boot has been off since i got this laptop and i never turned it back on. My best guess is that you either did something wrong when making the live media, or during the installation. Next time try using ventoy, it's a really useful tool.
I'll try Ventoy next time, thanks. I just followed the install instructions on Mint's website which says to use Etcher. Maybe that's the problem.
Also, did you manually edit your partitions? It might be related to your bootloader being in
/bootinstead of/boot/efi. The first one's for legacy bios, and the second is for uefi.Nope, I didn't do that either.
UEFI looks like another over-complicated proprietary shit that make PC more and more locked.
It is not
Pretty much from what I can tell.
You probably should use uefi as it is better in a lot of ways.
âŠwhat?
It tends to be more reliable and is easier to work with
Yeah, okay, but what has that got to do with the price of fish? I think youâre misunderstanding the post entirely:
When OP mentions going into the âBIOSâ theyâre using the term as the common name for the device settings menu that you can enter on boot. It is however a UEFI-based device. What OP had to change was the âBoot Modeâ from UEFI Mode to Legacy (or BIOS) mode. This affects how the UEFI looks for Operating Systems to boot, forcing it to search for Master Boot Records rather than EFI partitions, and booting those in a compatibility mode. This seems to be a bug with Lenovoâs implementation of UEFI, as it did not detect the Linux Mint Live USBâs UEFI partition. Most Live USBâs are still set up with a backup BIOS bootloader. OP then had to go back into their âBIOSâ (UEFI) and re-enable UEFI boot mode to be able to boot into their newly installed Linux Mint partition.
What Iâm struggling to understand is why you gave the advice âyou should use UEFIâ when OP was already using a UEFI-based systemâŠ
Edge ISO might have helped. It even supports secure boot.
I'm not familiar with Edge ISOs because I am a total novice here, but Mint's website says, "If you cannot boot or install Linux Mint because your hardware is too recent and is not properly detected, you may get better results with the âEdgeâ ISO image." This is 2016 hardware, so would it have applied?
Probably, sometimes I feel like some of the linux community thinks stuff made in 2015 is 'recent hardware' lol
As someone who also installed Mint on a Lenovo, I feel your pain. The only difference is that I was aware of the BIOS setting before I did the install because I'd read some forum posts preparing myself for the install.
I understand your perspective but the steps you mentioned are what you'd expect when installing an os. Even windows 11 would require you to turn on TPM which, for some, might be a super painful experience.
I have never had to install an OS where I had to go into the BIOS multiple times to change settings back and forth.
Still beats setting IRQs. Or dip switches, if you're really old. Expect to have to fiddle if you want custom. You want fisher-price, buy a Mac.
I am that old and I admit, that is definitely true.
I'm not saying I want Fisher-Price here. I just don't think there should be this much of a challenge to install Linux on an old ThinkPad like this.
I have no problem with Linux not being a push here dummy OS overall, but not only having to change BIOS settings twice, but having to spend two hours surfing around trying to figure out that was the issue, especially when it was installed but wouldn't boot... that's ridiculous. From what people are saying, it sounds like it's a combination of Lenovo being dickish and Mint not supporting it well enough.
But whatever, it's installed now and works fine. I just needed a rant after going through that.
I totally agree. I am an IT Profe and it's still very irritating to have to jump through these hoops. Plus each manufacturer has a different key you need to press to access the bios. Sometimes the same OEM will have different keys on different models.
So you try the normal ones which don't work and then have to Google the model number to try find out which key to hold.
Frustrating and time consuming. And definitely makes it very difficult for the average user to install Linux.
I sometimes think Microsoft did it on purpose to hinder Linux installs and then disguised it as "security".
It's not really "security" if you can turn it off is it?
This. 100%. It's why I don't understand folks recommending Lenovo laptops to run Linux on. Lenovo is in bed well Microsoft and caters to whatever they want. SecureBoot, modern standby, etc. We need more vendors supporting open source firmware like Coreboot.
Edit: feel free to refute me instead of just down voting.
Lenovo also no longer deserves their reputation for durability. They haven't for at least a decade. Their usb-c charging ports wear out super fast
That's what you get when you buy Lenovo. It can't even run Windows properly most of the time how did you expect it to run Linux?
Seriously if you go into any large company and ask why they don't use Lenovo they'll simply tell you that the failure rate of those machines is way to high to be worth it. Like order 50 and only 10 are in working condition after 2 years... or a simple USB 3 cable running along the computer will make it slow because there isn't enough shielding on the machine and the high frequency of those cables interferes with your storage controller / NVMe.
Because I asked in this community and got a bunch of people who said they ran Linux on it and it worked just fine? Which it does now that it's been installed.
Hardware recommendations are really hard, brands to a lot of shit and there are a LOT of small details that make it so a small revision on the same model can make or break compatibility with any OS... even worse for Linux. Windows has tons of specifics hacks to work on specific hardware and they aren't pretty.
For me, personally I always got the best result with HP EliteBooks from 2 or 3 generations bellow the current one and the latest Debian. But again, that's just personal experience, nobody can guarantee you that you won't pick a very specific EliteBook with some awkward detail and things will fail.
I'm surprised HP notebooks are trustworthy at this point.
Depends on the line... the high end enterprise products (EliteBooks) are very solid and good, they also provide very good servicing, every piece of those machines is replaceable even screws have serial numbers and can be ordered from HP.
ProBooks are a mixed batch, some are decent others are total garbage. Consumer grade HP mostly follows the same trend, if you go for machines that are "Apple-priced" they're good, otherwise crap. Still not as crap as Lenovo became after China.
I doubt I'd be able to afford one of those. I got this because it was $200 refurbished.