New study finds bots and fraud farms responsible for 73% of web traffic
interestingengineering.com
New study finds bots and fraud farms responsible for 73% of web traffic::undefined
New study finds bots and fraud farms responsible for 73% of web traffic::undefined
More evidence for the Dead Internet Theory
Not yet but soon it will be
Death by a thousand
cutsbot/shill posts.I don’t necessarily think it’s a bad thing if people were good, but it can easily be abused as we’ve seen with election manipulation.
"73% of web traffic" does not mean 73% of comments, posts, content, etc.
It amazes me when I spin up some random server on a cloud provider and it's immediately getting tons of traffic from bots searching for insecure ssh servers and default WordPress admin credentials and then like. If that's the short of stuff they're counting, I'd believe it. But yeah, it's not like all the commenters on this post are bots.
Yeah we had a presentation at work from AWS , they said expect all ports and protocols on any aws server you spin up to be scanned in less than 1min of any instance being created
What percentage would you guess that are bots as commenters?
That's a good question, I doubt I could make a very accurate guess. Just broadly though, based mainly on the lack of an immediately obvious payoff, I'd guess less than 50%.
The web is like a shitty neighborhood now, with stalkers and unpleasant people coming up to you frequently to sell their shady stuff.
Still works for finding answers to technical questions but if I wasn't working in tech, I would probably question why im using it in the first place. Is the entertainment value worth the cost?
Depends does hentai count as entertainment cayse if so. Yes.
Based. That and comics of culture.
Holy shit, thinking of all the resources that are just wasted for this shit... Imagine you could just slash all web infrastructures by two thirds.
I really hate the phrase "bots" because it gives the appearance that they're all useless and malicious. I guarantee you they lumped in the following extremely valid uses of "bots":
Are AI chatbots bots? If they use a loose enough definition all this means is humans utilize fuck tons of automation over the Internet, both programmers and not.
Tech journalism is fucking garbage. Its always trying to tell me what to think rather than present legit unbiased information. It seems to get worse every year as if these journalist have a hate on for the tech they write about
Why do you think that such bots cause a relevant amount of traffic?
Because they're used absolutely everywhere, and often back large portions of Internet infrastructure. I'm a backend developer and we have thousands of "bots" running at any given time to keep our systems going. They generate traffic equivalent to thousands of people and are maintained by a 3 person dev team. This is for a relatively small company. When I was at AWS the scale was much more unfathomable.
How?
TamperMonkey (I've been told to use ViolentMonkey instead as TamperMonkey isn't open source) and the script here. Then you can run a script to periodically log into your account in a headless browser and click the button. Unfortunately there's no coupon API so this is the best solution I could think of.
I use a bot to convert source code into executable binaries.
That's a very good point, thanks!
Not really, as with many others the headline is sensationalist. It's missing the "... on login page attempts for sites that pay for and or use bot protection services."
That's very good to know and makes the situation a lot less bleak. Thank you for the additional context!
NP, this article was also posted by a bot, so.. You know.
Soon there will be content created and consumed entirely by generative "ai," an almost shadow-culture.
They'll have memes beyond our understanding!
Obligatory
Prophetic.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Obligatory
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Thanks, guy who posts Piped links!
What worries me, though, is the idea of bots infiltrating the Fediverse...posting among us.
100% on Twitter, 150% on Facebook. Or maybe the other way around 🤷
Was scrolling through Facebook as I still use it to keep in touch with family. 20 sponsored posts for every one actual post. Facebook is terrible.
I just went on my annual visit. I'm not sure if it was ublock or what, but it was actually a fairly pleasant experience with no 'sponsored' content. Reminded me of the Facebook of old. Accessed through the browser, of course. I don't want that cancerous app on my phone.
I am on mobile. I'll try desktop!
I was on mobile too, just on Firefox with ublock.
I caught that after I replied. Firefox with ublock is now my default android browser. You're right..going into feed mode to see posts chronologically with ad block is the Facebook of old. Thanks for the tip.
How are you about to do that on Facebook? I can't even sign up without it asking for my ID
And I thought porn and cat pictures where responsible for 70% of web traffic... TIL
This is just what the bots are into.
It's why AI porn is so popular all of a sudden, all the bots thought human porn was weird.
70% of my web traffic, anyways.
Horse shit.
Sandvine still released traffic reports. So does Cable Labs.
Maybe attempted connections, but not volume / tonnage / bytes.
Okay, bot. I believe it, doesn't surprise me at all. Lemmy is also full of bots.
I'm a bot
Yeah dead internet. And I hope this news will kill online marketing for good
As long as real users exist on the internet, marketing will follow. If centralized social media will be even more of a shithole than already is, then they will slowly target the decentralized. You won't escape marketing.
But if 73% of traffic is fake, and they monitor traffic to determine sentiment and marketing strategies, then who are they actually marketing TO?
Those left over who are still human.
But you do bring up a great point, what happens when the Internet is nothing but bots/shills?
Man they caught
Googleevil actors using Google's infra that pumped up view numbers for video impressions and milking advertisers.They got swindled millions by the 3ve "scandal".
There's botfarms clicking ads and following brands.
There's warehouses full of smartphones that fake download and fake use apps and fake watch video ads....
At this point it's a money laundering scheme. I refuse to believe that those people responsible are that stupid.
So the same as snail mail and phone calls?
I recently switched cell providers to save a pile of money, but the new one doesn't have call control like the old did. 100% of my calls over the last two weeks were spam calls. I keep telling myself the savings are worth it, but my God it's annoying.
I miss the days when the internet was a fad that most people were apathetic towards.
before we even had search engines, and had to rely on websites listing links to every website.
banner exchange 😂
Internet yellow pages and ring networks and word of mouth and slips of paper with weird urls written out on them.
1px midis with auto play.
oh man.. and frames. and tables.
Whens the last time you saw a classic html table?
Well, I work in web dev as a career so unfortunately the answer to that is not long enough ago :/
Last week when a "Senior Fullstack Developer" who has had "senior" in his title for more than 4 years used a table for layout.
i hate it when i open my laptop and there’s an error sign blocking the trackpad
Bot wars
No I'm not!
No I'm... Doesn't..
!veryrealtechpics@lemmy.world
How much of the internet is automated should be the real question.
Wonder what the engineering solution to this could look like..
Thinking something like a zero trust model being required for all web requests.. Like the target address would need to receive a validated identity token from some third party but that token couldn't contain identifying info about the requester. Likewise, the validating third party would need to verify the identity of the requester without having knowledge of the target address.
Then that raises more questions like who would we all be comfortable trusting as a verifier and what data would we use for that validation? The validation system and the data used to validate would need to be provided for free too to account for low income people so no subscription services or hardware MFA keys. Also who counts as an identity to be validated?
What do enforcement mechanisms look like if this does get built? Are the validators entirely passive or do they actively participate in the process? Like do we have rate limits imposed by the validation engine or do we just leave that to the target address/organization to impose themselves? What happens if someone is banned from a site? Does the site notify the validators to drop requests earlier in the lifetime of a request? Do individuals get a lower request quota than corporations? Would you have to form a company just to prototype a new tool/product?
If someone seriously wanted to work on this I'd jump on the opportunity to work with them. It sounds like a fascinating project.
It's called Google's "Web Integrity API" and it's a horrifically bad idea.
Giving india access to to the internet was a mistake
None of the Indians I've met are bots
They are the ones who make bots that flood the internet. But yes most of them act like bots too.
Most bot generated content is from things like ChatGPT, so are you going to be mad at people in San Francisco now?
Hmm... If it wasn't for Starfleet Headquarters being there I'd say yes.
Just one year until the Bell Riots.
I'm talking about times before the ai meme was taken on by the masses
Bravely said on a throwaway. 🙄
Good morning sir
Oh no! Poor people!
Jokes on you majority of internet users are not from India, but from English speaking countries. Any other language takes a smaller percentage.