As Smartphone Industry Sputters, the iPhone Expands Its Dominance
nytimes.com
As Smartphone Industry Sputters, the iPhone Expands Its Dominance::Apple, which is set to release a new iPhone on Tuesday, has increased its share of smartphone sales by converting Android customers and adding teenagers.
Unless an iphone becomes literally the only option, I don't see myself ever getting one. I'm deeply morally opposed to their walled-garden approach, and I won't even get one Samsung's Androids for the same reason. It would be nice for me if there was more people like me, but regardless, as long as there's a freer option, I'll be taking it.
It's too bad Android didn't lean more into it's relative freedom. Instead, almost all Android manufacturers have followed Apple's lead closely. I have to believe there'd be a sizeable market for a flagship Android phone with, say, a removable battery, headphone jack, SD card slot, and an easily unlocked bootloader.
They exist, they just arenāt popular because most people donāt care.
They don't exist. Believe me, since I finally put my old LG V20 out to pasture, I've been waiting. The closest thing is the Fairphone, but it doesn't support all US LTE bands.
Aside from maybe the headphone jack, those are all features that enthusiasts want but average consumers don't care about enough to compromise on size, waterproofing or price.
Smartphones depend so much on economies of scale, and a limited pool of cutting edge components, it would be hard to sustain a niche market just for enthusiasts.
Bootloader a are usually pretty easy to unlock, it's Safetynet that is the biggest problem these days. Though you can generally sandbox it a little bit with a custom ROM. If, however, you try to keep it stock and have it rooted with Magisk it can be a nightmare depending on the manufacturer.
Its like picking between different types of cancer, its either walled garden or a privacy nightmare.
And Apple is out there dual wielding both issues while adding a human rights violation as well
Iām not familiar with any human rights violations from Apple, unless youāre talking about in their supply chain, in which case many of the reports recently come from Apple themselves as they investigate their suppliers. Itās not like other manufacturers arenāt using factories in China or India, or cobalt mines in developing countries.
What are you referring to?
Apple is literally lobbying congress to allow them to use slave labor. Congress was looking to pass a bill that would block the sale of products manufactured through the use of slave labor and Apple literally called a meeting with them to "talk about it and see how everyone feels about the situation". Scum
I'm just opposed to their brand ethos. They always complicate things in the name of simplicity.
apple mice have 1 button to click, and that this decision was made (in the 80s) because they thought 2 button mice would confuse the average user.
... and now apple users command + click all the time, like that isn't more complicated.
That's not why I hate apple, but it is why I hate apple. They perpetually put the cart before the horse.
"We stopped including a charger in the box to help the environment"
Actually this means more boxes are being created in total and this is worse for the environment. š¤¦āāļø
Edit: God you apple stans are annoying af. I guess y'all are just an extension of their obnoxious ethos lol.
Apple Mice have had right click for 14 years, and their trackpads have used two finger click in its place far longer than that. And before that, any two button mouse worked just fine in OS X from 2001 on (earlier if you ran the beta of OS X). So your information is anywhere from two decades to one and a half decades out of date. Well done.
Someone's mad.
So what you're saying is they put the cart before the horse and eventually succumbed to the market pressure of their mistakes.
Got it.
Oh look, they did it again.
What's really sad is that you're out here promoting a trillion dollar company for free. Well done.
Hello projection my old friendā¦
No, just responding to their cheeky "well done" comment.
Just because you say someone is projecting doesn't make it true.
I like how you Apple stans keep proving my point about the brand's borderline toxic ethos.
Acting like someone is a corporate shill just because they donāt agree with you reeks of butthurt
Out here calling people names but anyone that doesnāt agree with you are the toxic ones, lol
butthurt? About... what?
Dude... go outside.
You seem to be upset that this isnāt an echo chamber. And yes, Iāll be sure to touch some grass as soon as I clock out.
Now who's projecting?
I am in no way upset, my guy. It's clear you are, though.
Cheers.
Iām not upset by your views of Apple at all. I donāt have an emotional connection to them any more than I do the company that made my forks. Doesnāt change the fact that your criticism is so old it can go buy a six pack.
Is there a reason you're still talking, beyond that lack of emotional connection?
Please, don't answer š
š
I agree with you and the OP of this thread. I don't want to support a company with a walled garden approach and they over complicate things to be unique
How so? That thought only works if you think they still manufacture the same amount of chargers and package them. Which would be pretty dumb given that they arenāt guaranteed a sell. Also, who doesnāt have a bunch of different chargers already?
You can Google for the myriad of reports on this very topic.
Here's the top result.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/16/21519466/apple-iphone-12-chargers-airpods-greenhouse-gas-emissions-e-waste
Lots of āmightsā and āifsā. No concrete evidence. Also they write that it might spread out across lots of manufacturers. And not only that, this is an article from when the iPhone 12 got released, which was the first to include a USB-C to lightning adding to the worry.
Again, you're free to use Google and continue your research yourself. There are lots of them. I took the top result, I didn't vet it because the mountain of evidence is overwhelming.
Cheers.
Lmao, are you forgetting they also changed the cable from standard usb to lightning to USB c to lightning after they stopped including the brick?
Yeah, because everything is transitioning to USB-C and thatās a good thing. They made that switch when they removed USB A ports from their Macs.
They only made the jump to USB-C because they were forced to. They would have loved to stay on their proprietary hardware for as long as possible.
Rumor is they wanted to wait to go portless. In current state Qi chargers work on iPhones but they donāt charge as quickly as their proprietary MagSafe connector which I find ridiculous so Iām glad they had to add a standard port
That doesn't invalidate my point at all.
Apple stans gonna stan.
lol god forbid I donāt agree with yāall on one specific criticism of Apple. Thereās plenty they do I criticize. Still mad about the 3.5 mm Jack and their repair bs is hypocritical
It does create less waste. If someone buys an iPad, Apple Watch, and iPhone they can charge them all off one usbc brick. Doesnāt need to be Apple brand. I use an Anker one myself. Same thing with their cheap headphones that used to come with the phone. I had accumulated a bunch of crappy headphones I never used over the course of a decade.
Speaking of annoying af. Look at you, you're the same. You're not anti-apple, you're just pro-anti.
Apple devices have had right click for a while now. Itās a two finger press.
His point is that they were 2 decades late to the party.
His point is wrong.
Wrong how? The Microsoft mouse was released in 1983 with 2 buttons. The first time Macs had a second mouse button was with OSX which was released in 2001.
Macs have always supported right mouse clicks. Theyāre just unnecessary in most cases. On top of that, no one Cmd+clicks because there arenāt anymore 1-button mice since the new mice are multitouch surfaces.
So, in other words, heās wrong for multiple reasons.
I love when people are confidently wrong.
Mac's have not "always supported right mouse clicks." https://www.wired.com/2000/10/eek-a-two-button-mac-mouse/
I also love when people are confidently wrong. OS8 supported 2-button mice, along with OS9, and OSX. Youāre confusing the fact that Appleās mice didnāt have 2 buttons with whether or not any 2-button mice worked. I know because I owned one. On top of that, you can still, to this day, emulate OS8 and OS9 and use the āsecondaryā click.
So are you going to admit you were wrong or are you going to gaslight me and tell me I didnāt use a two-button mouse more than 2 decades ago?
http://www.gearlive.com/index.php/news/article/why-apple-makes-a-one-buttoned-mouse-01280820/
āApple supports multi-button mice. Right out of the box. Furthermore, this is not a ānew featureā of OS X. Support for contextual menus (the primary use for the two button mouse) have been around since OS 8.6, which is now more than seven years old. Let me repeat, Apple supports multi-button mice.ā
After a deep dive of research into ADB and reading about the extended mouse protocol, i relent that yes Apple did support multiple mouse buttons for a long time.
However, also seeing that Apple's own first party multi-button mouse that supported right clicking only came out in 2005... your point is just like saying that old cars with 8-track playes supports Spotify cause i have my phone auxed into a converter.
So, factually, you're correct. But his point still stands.
That analogy is terrible. You could plugin a 2 button mouse and clicking the 2nd button gave you contextual menus. Youāre just being dishonest. There was no converter necessary.
I'm not being dishonest.
Apple never supplied you the mouse, it was hardware that you bought separately, just like the 8-track to Aux converter in my analogy. Apple only relented to providing you a mouse that supports 2 button clicks in 2005. That's something Microsoft has provided since day 1 which is why "they're late to the party". It also emphasizes how apple wants to limit it's user's experience despite their machine's capabilities.
I'm pretty sure that meets the requirements for the original point.
What phone did you end up choosing?
I went with the Motorola G Stylus 5g. It's not perfect, but it does have an SD slot, a headphone jack, FM radio, an easily unlocked bootloader, and a built-in stylus I didn't expect to care about but which I have grown weirdly dependent on. I just wish it had a removable battery.
It's what I have as well and I quite like it.
It's a very good phone overall in my opinion.
How are you liking it? That's at the top of my short list for my next phone? Any major flaws or issues?
Zero issues for me so far, except the standard complaint about modern phones; it's too darn big.
I really like the size but I'm 6'2" and about 260 pounds so I'm a pretty big guy I guess.
Personally, I wouldn't want to go back to a smaller one again though.
I can't think of any particular complaints I have with mine.
Works well...
Okay, I take that back... I wish battery life was a little bit better ...
But, that said, I often spend entirely too much time goofing off on my phone lately and that's certainly not helping.
Thanks. I'm the only one I know who uses moto phones so it's nice to hear opinions from people who actually own them.
I donāt see myself ever going back to Android (beyond my work phone that is) because itās so much hassle. An iPhone I can get second hand and keep for five or six years. Most Android manufacturers stop supporting their devices pretty much after release.
I donāt want to be forced to upgrade my phone all the time. Itās a tool, switching it out is a hassle. I donāt want to think about it all the time, itās just meant to be there and work when I need it.
Thatās something I never got from Android. I liked my OnePlus One, but I hated that I had to flash updates myself and use MAGISK to circumvent security stuff so I could use my day-to-day apps.
Honestly I think itās a problem with the whole āsmartphoneā market altogether. You donāt really own your device, and the manufacturers would love it if you upgraded yearly. Itās why twice-a-year releases were so popular for a while.
All I hope for is for all the anti-consumer bullshit to get regulated out of existence.
It sounds like you made some choices about how you engaged with android phones that you regretted. Maybe you weren't aware of the consequences of your choices, which I can see being a reason to favor apple (because they don't offer choices).
However, your experience could have been completely different. There are plenty of ways to use android's that don't involve nearly as much effort as you describe. Security updates can be nearly automatic, requiring only a restart. Root access isn't strictly necessary, but is choice you can make. And changing phones can be as easy as logging in to your Google account (nearly everything gets synced automatically).
I donāt want to change my phones. I want the device I paid out of my nose for to work however long I want it to.
In Sweden we have this authentication service called BankID, which is central to daily life. I use it to authenticate online purchases, pick up parcels, pay my bills, order groceries, handle doctors appointments, contact my ISP. You name it, it does it.
Now I have my issues with BankID as a platform, but itās what we have. Not using it is an option, but adds so much extra administrative overhead. Need to cancel your electricity because you moved? Sure, itās a five minute phone call with BankID, or alternatively a two week process with forms and BS.
The nature of this software means you need to have a phone with a recent security patch. They stop allowing older operating systems to run it for obvious reasons.
Thus, when I switched out my OPO in 2020 it was in part due to the failing hardware, but primarily because of how flaky the setup was. I had to unlock the boot loader to flash a ROM, BankID wouldnāt run with an unlocked boot loader, so I had to root the blasted thing to run MAGISK to fool the piece of shit that all was good.
I could obviously have upgraded to a newer phone, but with Android at the time Iād be in a similar spot a couple of years down the road. Apple has many issues, but they at least offer support for their devices for years.
The iPhone 5S was released the same year as my OnePlus One, and got a security patch back in January 2023. The OnePlus One got its last in 2016.
Samsung has dropped support for their $1980 Galaxy Fold 1, and it was only released in 2019. The iPhone XS I got second hand for $400 in 2020 was released in 2018 and got a mainline OS update the other day.
Android might work great for you, but until some major things change Iāll stick to iPhone as my personal device and keep Android as my work phone.
What? Your complaints would be solved by simply... not rooting your phone lmao.
My options were either rooting the device or throwing it out and buying a new one as a very important app didnāt support older OS versions anymore.
Fair enough, I've never had that problem
What apps required that much circumventing? I've owned solely Androids and I've never run into "my phone's software is so outdated I can't run XYZ apps on it"
Do you do something really special on your phone that requires the latest version, in which case your experience is not going to be relevant to most users... Or are you just wayyyyy overstating the actual impact it had on your life?
This right here heavily suggests they rooted their phone which is not exactly something recommended for a "one and done" type of phone setup. Not exactly well versed there but I doubt jail breaking an iPhone would net you a better experience than rooting an Android phone. So this, to me, reads like uninformed whining.
BankID stopped working on older phones (more correctly: older operating systems). Itās absolutely central to daily life in Sweden.
I mean google plans on supporting the pixel 8 for a really long time, sampsung provides support for a pretty long time
Yeah, and thatās excellent, itās sad that it took a decade and a half to decide to do so though. Fairphone I believe is setting out to offer security patches for ten years, so whenever Iām swapping out my Pixel 6, thatās probably the company Iām going with.
Apple has many issues. Theyāre obviously greedy. I hate their underhanded marketing strategies. Their greenwashing makes me cringe. I hate how hard they cling on to locking down their phones, and Iām glad the EU has stepped in. But they have been offering the best software support on the market.
My phone is five years old, and Iāve had it for three years. The battery could suffer replacing, but other than that it feels brand new. The only crashes Iāve ever had have been Samsungās stupid smart home app, and some apps in beta testing. I miss the ability to have two apps open side by side, but thatās the only thing I miss with my Android phone.
Outside the US, no one cares. Most people use WhatsApp and they don't care what hardware it runs on.
What's WhatsApp?
Edit: nm i googled it. It's a way to sacrifice your privacy and security while supporting an evil company. I'm cool...
As if iMessage, the platform that requires hardware from a specific company, is much better.
There are more than two options for messaging now.
Both primary phone platforms are kinda shit though.
I'm a Signal man myself but iMessage's faults don't make WhatsApp any better and that's a blatant whataboutism, fuck!
I can't believe you seriously asked what WhatsApp is... where do you come from?
Dude could be Chinese..
Compton fool! But i think the real excuse is I'm old and don't do social media other than this.
Everyone around me have family groups on WhatsApp, including 90+ old grandmas.
Awesome! You should definitely investigate Signal and start recommending it to others. Meta is evil and can't be trusted. Or privacy is critical to our survival. Party on, Comrade
I was a Signal fan until they decided to drop SMS. Now it's just an app with 1% of my friends.
Why are you attached to sms?
Because that's the universal text messaging platform - everybody's got it. And because we're receiving messages from companies via SMS.
Yeah. I don't care about that. Security trumps convenience for me and i have to say that signal is pretty convenient.
Funnily enough, WhatsApp being E2E encrypted means it's one of the more private and secure chat apps out there.
It still records who you talk to, as well as how much and when. That info is held by the biggest peddler in privacy info out there. No way I trust Facebook/meta as much as any of the other e2e chat clients.
Oh yeah, other options are better. Implying that it's completely unsecure is just misleading.
Gotcha, good point.
The problem is, it's not open source... so whole E2E encryption is based on "trust us" method. We have no idea if implementation is any good or if it at all does what hey claim it does. Sure at some point they might have paid some company to do independent review but it's not on version-by-version basis.
E2E encrypted between facebook app #1 and facebook app #2, sure
It doesn't help Google is locking down android more and more with each release,inching closer and closer to Apple's shitty philosophy without the same guaranteed support.
I kinda wonder if there will be any US device makers left? I guess mg biggest fear is let's say iPhone uses up 90% marketshare in the US than releases a new standard for cell carriers and they drop support for anything but iOS.
Monopolistic companies: āThis is the wayā
Imagine traveling to the USA requiring an iphone. Rip tourism
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Wireless providers, much like auto dealers, offer discounts and monthly payment plans that make it more affordable to buy the latest model.
The stigma associated with having green text messages is so pronounced that when it came time for Dave Storrsās 14-year-old son to get his first smartphone, the teenager told his father that he wanted an iPhone or no phone at all.
For more than a decade, he took pride in being what he called an āAndroid renegade.ā He owned a series of LG and Motorola phones, even as his son and other family members pressed him to buy an iPhone.
The migration from Android to Apple has accelerated as promotional discounts, financing plans and trade-in offers make higher iPhone prices less of a barrier.
In 2017, Apple began working with government officials to start manufacturing iPhones locally, a move that has improved affordability by avoiding import tariffs.
The new flagship iPhones that Apple is set to unveil this week will feature speedier processors, more sophisticated cameras and titanium rather than stainless steel cases, according to supply chain analysts.
The original article contains 1,266 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
IPhone or no phone at all? Ok, you have your wish. No phone.
I am a big Apple guy, but this is not healthy. I wish Google would step up their game.
I'll just stick with lineage os
So depressing when the bad guys win. iPhone keeps getting worse quality relative to competitors and keeps gaining market share... that thing with the blue and green bubbles should really be illegal.
š